Lizzie asks…
Are Republicans smarter than a 7th grader?
The drill, drill, drill crowd complained that alternative energy would take too long to come on line. Read the attached: perhaps Republicans thought American know-how couldn’t solve problems because they were too buys kissing up to the oil industry. Are they smarter than a 7th grader?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/zd/232218;_ylt=AppgX5QohKbgUeT85f57ko4DW7oF
EAST COASTER: Thanks for answering my question. Are you aware that any drilling approved today will take decades to produce oil and, according to geological surveys, will likely produce heavy sour, not light sweet crude that our refineries use? You really don’t understand this, do you? Yet, you are going to vote for Republican, and perpetuate the problem? Perhaps you should re-read the original question.
I am Obamas Lack of Experience: Why would you answer a question without saying anything?
EVAN: High C leadership types are never leaders; I’ll send you a red pencil.
KEN: see response to East Coaster.
electraglyderydyr: Pompous, does that imply inaccurate? The truth is we cannot drill our way out of this problem. Republican obstruction of alternatives is real, for the purpose of creating an election wedge issue and eliciting the responses seen here. Lose 17 points in popularity for a YA answer. 99% of the folks on here are partisans. I participate because as a true Republican I am embarrassed and humiliated by the lack of leadership in the party I used to love. Wedge issues instead of leadership: pathetic.
The Expert answers:
I really wish this wasn’t a partisan issue. This and the environment need genuine discussion, not political crap.
David asks…
HOW COME THE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY HAS NOT ACTED IN VALIDATING WINSTON KAYANAN’S CLAIMS ON THE ENVIRONMENT?
UN Sec. Gen. Ban Ki-moon is incredibly committed to push his predecessor’s anti-life Kyoto Protocol and possibly, its mandate in October 2009 and amendment thereof come December in Danish capital of Copenhagen. However, he does not seem to understand that the carbon emission reduction as what the organization has been espousing is only a hypothesis which does not guarantee the right solution to world’s environmental woes. And the 12 long years of delay to finalize Kyoto Protocol is a proof of hidden force from God in giving a strong reluctance, i.e., posing threat to world’s economic survival and hence, how can the highest organization achieve a better world when its philosophy in the environment requires the expense of global economy? There is no wisdom, spirit & power in this philosophy. The mission could not give a brighter vision in beholding the light of day for a possible better & freer life in accordance with UN’s charter.
In an attempt, the author Winston Kayanan from the Philippines (claiming to possess the right answer in global warming & climate change) gave the most powerful argument ever voiced out & directed against a world organization, about his antithesis against carbon emission reduction last of which, was in May 2009 in the internet via yahoo’s question & answer. Contrary to world’s concern on economy, his attack was rather on undiscovered & undetected UN’s basis in science that gave carbon emission reduction as its mission. In spite of the author’s move in providing leads & clues as well as answers, he gave ample time of 3 months (from June to end of August 2009) for the scientific community to give second thought on one of the author’s objectives, i.e., O2 regeneration vs. UN’s carbon emission reduction but nothing seemed to be perceived when most could not picture or understand much as to how we can entirely meet sensibly & intelligibly to solve problems. Up to this time, there is no good news on science breakthroughs, particularly coming from them (the rest of the scientific community).
It is surprising to find that the scientific community had not conceived anything deeper. They missed the whole point because scientific studies should be analyzed & concluded in the beginning and then finally resolved in the same way, i.e., scientific than jumping into economic theory in the end. Like for instance, decay microorganisms vs. transportation & industries (regarding the issue on emission increment of greenhouse gases); laser-effect of solar radiation vs. arson (re: wildfires) or vs. mutation (re: drug dependence); biomass as organic matter vs. biomass as alternative energy (re: soil infertility); soil rehabilitation vs. plant forest (re: desertification); declining agriculture vs. sanitary landfill (re: land deterioration); carbon retrieval vs. carbon trading (re: lop-sided greenhouse gases); rice lands as source of methane vs. food production (re: food shortage or famine), among others. Some showed criticisms just for the sake of opposing & rebutting when these were merely contempt for knowledge & wisdom and hence, world’s brains are not working.
They also thought the author was some kind of disturbed person, dubbed as an alarmist, while others thought the questions & answers were some kind of entertainment. These passive notions do not serve world’s slogan “save man & save earth” and thus, the mission to purge the environment is unknowingly perverted and people are eventually deserted. In a matter of life & death situation, where is the humanity here? Is there no people power from the scientific community being cooked up to confront UN and its scientists, for giving the wrong direction & the wrong science to the world? Future generations may either judge the scientific community of treachery (in concealing the real science) or negligence (in not rendering the true science) – unfortunately at the expense of people and earth.
It took 3 months for the author to draw a natural but powerful technology (scientific evidence) in the year 2001 and took 2 minutes within 5 days to decode the 4-Beast vision of Daniel in the Bible (theological evidence or religious knowledge) in 2004. In this tandem, God made the author see the world’s faults in the environment. And the author who has already known the right answer to global warming & climate change 8 years ago, carries a timely revelation of the Word of God that was essentially made for the purpose of settling current outstanding global issues & problems in the environment as well as exposing characters responsible for the faults. These are not presumed or assumed but currently agreeing with facts & logic. They are clearly interrelated, a synthesis of two strong connecting sciences, intelligibly working & complementing not only for the physical world but metaphysically because there is a permanent structure to reality above & beyond what people are not aware of and hence, these would be the best of all possible worlds. God gave scienti
The Expert answers:
“HOW COME THE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY HAS NOT ACTED IN VALIDATING WINSTON KAYANAN’S CLAIMS ON THE ENVIRONMENT?”
Winston makes up his own science. They already have alarmist reinventing science. They aren’t taking auditions for more.
Mary asks…
Is all of the work of global warming starting to unravel as people learn more about this hoax?
1. Australia’s Senate rejects Emissions Trading Scheme for a second time.
2. Danes caught fiddling their carbon credits. – Carbon trading is the Emperor’s New Clothes of international finance. It was invented by none other than Ken Lay, whose Enron would currently be one of the prime beneficiaries in the global alternative energy market, if it hadn’t been shown to be (nearly) as fraudulent as the current AGW scam
3. Hats off to The Daily Express – the first British newspaper to make the AGW scam its front page story
4. BBC finally gets round to reporting – sort of – that Climatic Research Unit at University of East Anglia may have been up to no good
5. Legal actions ahoy! – Two scientists, one British, one Canadian, who intend to pursue the CRU for criminal fraud. Their case, quite simply, is that the scientists implicated in Climategate have gained funding and career advancement by twisting data, hiding evidence, and shutting out dissenters by corrupting the peer-review process.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100018556/climategate-its-all-unravelling-now/
The Expert answers:
Yes the world is sick and tired of being conned!
Paul asks…
Is the bloom off the Algore Global Warming rose?
Gore’s presentation on climate change draws 800 as 200 protestors gather outside
“Tickets for the event sold for $44 to $339, with proceeds going to the nonprofit Alliance for Climate Protection that Gore chairs.
“Gore began his remarks by calling climate change “the most dangerous problem we’ve ever faced. But it is also a tremendous opportunity for us to solve problems that have been neglected for a long time.”
“Organizers allowed the media to cover only the first few minutes of Gore’s presentation.
“In addition to his nonprofit advocacy, Gore is a partner in a venture capital firm that finances “sustainable” and alternative energy businesses, prompting some critics to accuse Gore of promoting environmental policies that will fatten his bank account.
“Cap & Tax — Don’t Be Fooled: Al Gore Will Make billions,” read a sign carried by Alan Tudor, who drove from Tampa to attend Saturday’s protest.
“Gore’s Favorite Green Product? Your money in his pocket,” said another sign.
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/gore-s-presentation-on-climate-change-draws-800-59205.html
Brother Al is poised to be the first “green billionaire” because of his Powerpoint movie, bilking millions from the True Believers, and using his connections to generate the Global Warming crisis from which he will profit nicely due to his “green investments”.
The Expert answers:
When more americans realize that they will be “funding” this so-called crisis while the rest of the world continues polluting at a rate that far surpasses anything the united states does, and laughs in our faces like china and india did to hillary when she went there to garner support, they will begin to question the efficacy of gore’s proposals. Anyone who cannot see that gore is out to green-up his own bank account is wearing blinders.
Lisa asks…
Why don’t America just print money to pay off debt?
Can anyone give me some insight here? A am studying economy myself, but can’t come up with any arguments why not to do it (that are not ethical please)????
Printing more money to buy back their debt from especially China (a debt which is in american dollars) will both lower the real value of the debt and of course lower the debt in terms that they pay back.
Another effect is the export which will rise giving money to the industry, therefore creating jobs and taxes to the government. Of course it would be expensive to buy imports but say they waited to do this until they are independent of oil (using from their own sources and alternative energy) it wouldn’t be that bad with the import.
I know the dollar would devaluate, the rent would rise and the inflation would be great. But can’t see that it would matter. Especially the inflation as it would be expected.
Here’s why I had the thought: http://moneywatch.bnet.com/economic-news/blog/macro-view/qe2-600-billion-fed-move-targets-new-jobs-but-risks-inflation/2747/
The Expert answers:
As you know, judging by the article you posted, they are doing that in a limited way, to the tune of 600 billion dollars. But if they did it massively, they would suffer the same fate as the Weimar Republic of Germany in the 1930’s, which ended with Hitler’s election.
Massive money printing leads to runaway inflation (it’s not a problem with QE2 because we have such low inflation at the moment due to the poor state of the economy that a little more would be a beneficial protection against deflation, which is even worse than inflation). It also leads to a total lack of trust in our credit as a nation, which means we wouldn’t be able to raise money in the future by borrowing when we need to. Printing money would be the only means of raising more money than we have, which would only exacerbate the economic troubles. By the end of the 1930’s in Germany, you would have to take a wheelbarrow of money to the store to buy bread. Obviously, that’s not a situation we want to replicate.
Printing money, like all tools in the Fed’s box, must be carefully considered and used only when appropriate.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers