Your Questions About Green Living

Linda asks…

Why arent we enforcing the use of renewable energy and alternative forms or fuel?

why do we persist on continuing using our cars, boats or other vehicles when the price of oil is so high with so many protest from many industry groups across the world pleading their national governments to do something about the price of gas.

Is it not obvious enough that oil will run out and with the increasing price of fuel world wide? Its like humans are willing to pay more fuel money to drive thier car from A to B.

Why are we so reliant a non renewable resource that will eventually out. Its like society has a fetish for oil and fuel where we have become so dependent on it.

What can be done to break this addiction to non renewable resources that we depend so much on.

The Expert answers:

Because in order to force people to switch to an alternative fuel, you would have to force nearly everyone in the US to buy a new car and for many, especially in an economic recession, that just isnt an option. You gonna buy everyone a new car?

Nancy asks…

Will fracking give us the breathing room we need for renewable energy development.?

There is a lot of concern right now about the environmental impacts of fracking for natural gas. Natural gas production by fracking, though, is considerably more environmentally friendly than coal production by mining. Production and transportation costs are enough lower for gas than coal that gas is now a cheaper energy source than coal in the U.S. There are substantial reserves that can be developed by fracking in the rest of the world as well.Coal, which fuels about 45% of U.S. electrical power generation right now, generates about .96 Kg of CO2 per Kw-hr of electricity produced. Natural gas only exhausts about .57Kg CO2/Kw-hr when burned in the same efficiency powerplant. Newer dual-cycle gas-fired plants can about double the efficiency of coal-fired plants. Replacing coal-fired plants with natural gas would therefore decrease our CO2 output from electrical generation by more than 20%. In the 10-20 years until solar becomes the cheapest form of electrical energy, will lower-priced natural gas decrease our CO2 output enough to keep us below a 1000 Gt budget for world cumulative output from fossil fuel?
Edit – Larry, Who’s this “they” you are talking about?I was in the semiconductor manufacturing business in 1974 and heard no such thing.
Edit – Larry The Chairman of Evergreen Solar has stated that they will have grid parity in less than 3 years, with no improvement in the cost of silicon. MIT Tech review lists several companies that have demonstrated use of a recently off-patent technique for making silcon/polysilicon wafers at about a 50% savings. I base the 10-20 year estimate on those two sources, Moore’s law, and my expectations of how fast the solar industry can scale up.
Z – The reason natural gas prices are so low right now is that fracking has brought so much more production online. Those left-wingers must not be quite as effective as you think. Can you give anything other than your opinion why solar won’t be cheaper than fossil?
D/dx – I’m of the opinion that biomass methane can’t scale up fast enough to make a significant contribution before solar dominates. Contradictory evidence will be read and appreciated.

The Expert answers:

Methane can be made quite easily from biomass and then cleaned to pipeline standards, so fracking is not necessary. The cost of production is about $4/GJ, which is close to the current spot price for natural gas. The economic merit depends on location because pipeline transport is a significant cost. Locally, the consumer cost of natural gas is about 75% over the spot price due to pipeline charges. That leaves room for local production from biomass sources to be profitable. $4 cost of production + $2 profit margin + $1 local distribution. For fossil natural gas the numbers are $2 cost of production + $2 profit + $2 pipeline + $1 local distribution. The consumer price is the same, but local production from renewable sources is preferable because all of the money stays in the local economy and it is carbon neutral.

Edit: RE solar vs biomass scale up. I like both technologies. Solar captures a larger fraction of solar radiation than plants, but comes at a higher capital cost. At 50 N, a solar PV panel operates at 25% efficiency in December and January due to low solar irradiation. Solar PV panels are more suited to lower latitudes where the longer duty cycle will justify the investment. I think that biomass energy is more suitable for high latitudes where solar irradiation is more seasonal. The technology for biomass methane is quite simple. If 20,000 peasant farmers in Bangladesh can build anaerobic digestion pits with minimal resources and cook their meals with the gas produced, the technology is within reach for most Americans (although some of the comments on YA make me wonder…). The main limiting factor for biomass methane is political will.

Carol asks…

Renewable and non-renewable energy sources?

Ok i need(one place in the world it is used, advantages and disadvantages) of the following

coal
oil
natural gas
Nuclear power
solar power
Hydroelectric power
Geothermal power
tidal power
biomass

The Expert answers:

Disadvantages:

Coal
Oil
Natural gas
Nuclear power

Advantages:

Solar power
Hydroelectric power
Geothermal power
Tidal power
Biomass

Hope I helped! 🙂

Mark asks…

Why are more and more people not realizing the impact they have on the world?

It seems to me and others I have talked to that more and more of us are under the impression that this world is never ending. The population is rising, and I can’t help but feel that people who have more than one or two children are clueless and selfish. This world can not continue to support a population explosion. The more space we consume, the less area we have to support ecosystems, the places required to grow food, support wildlife. This is directly impacted by population.
My second issue is renewable energy. Auto manufacturer’s are just now realizing they need to be responsible. Technology in automobile engines have shown that 50 mpg is not impossible to acheive. It’s been around since the 60’s. Electric cars have been around since before then as well. Am I the only one disturbed by all of this? The stupidity of those who are driven by money instead of the desire to help.
And those who say Nuclear energy is clean….think again. The bi-product is toxic. Be aware
As far as my understanding of our impact on the world, lets just say part of what I do is to provide the world with energy efficient designs for everyday use. It’s my day job. To further my point, nuclear energy has a bi-product that is toxic for hundreds of years. How much of this bi-product can we bury and forget about? It is not a realistic solution. Example: wind, water and solar are clean solutions to provide energy. Coal burning facilities are one of the worst contributors for greenhouse gases. Maybe not first on the list, but it is a problem. There are always new ways to save energy, flourescent light bulbs save energy, but how many people just throw them in the garbage and introduce mercury to the landfills? We use less energy but pollute in other ways. I have no solutions although I do help to make this world more energy effecient one building at a time. My need is to get everyone to reflect on these issues. Be aware, the time is now.

The Expert answers:

I think many people know of the impact but do not want to spend the extra time or money they think lessening their impact will take. Changing the way people are raised to think is hard,too.

George asks…

What will it take to change the way we consume energy on a mass scale?

From oil to coal we seem to be consuming energy from non-renewable sources. Do the major energy companies have a solution for a post-oil world? Does industry have a plan in place for producing goods when the lights go out? Are we just going to sit around and wait for the wells to go dry?

The Expert answers:

Individually, be aware of where of you dispose everything . Recycling has a major impact on our environment and it is also a political statement from the community. Politicians pay attention to your demands with the environment, now. Also , be aware of how alternative fuels work ahead of time, so when they become available you can demand either ethanol or biodiesel as a your choice of fuel. If the demand is big enough, the suppliers will produce.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Translate »