Your Questions About Green Living

Mark asks…

Strong economy or solutions to environment and social issues?

We have social and enviromental problems in the UK, US, Western Europe but we seem to be happy if our economy is strong.

I understand that economic growth has resulted in healthcare, enough to eat and a home for almost everybody – this is a good thing. However, social and environmental issues are often not tackled and are negected due to the economics and trying to become more “wealthy “as a country.

Now we all have enough to eat, have a home and have healthcare…should we now tackle our problems with society and environment?
Terrorism: It is a social issue.

Environmental issues: Global warming (I am ignoring the first comment but not the peer reviewed articles on the subject), smog, acidic rain, polluted rivers, deforestation, extinction of plants and animals, polluted seas etc. etc.

The Expert answers:

I think its an error, or at least a misconception, to say that healthcare, food and housing in the UK are no longer an issue. There is still clearly a lot that needs to be done in these areas. However, I would agree that other issues (particularly environmental – climate change, e.t.c) need to be tackled with greater priority and urgency than they have been previously, given our current knowledge and understanding.

Mary asks…

Why do the left wing nuts keep ranting about Global Warming causing sunamis?

When everyone know that they are caused by Earthquakes. And to use mercury filled lightbulbs to save the earth when these bulbs will find their way to landfills and cause even more pollution? Why won’t they consider nuclear power when its been shown to be safe in our country for years? Now I here that they say that having a third child is as bad as driving an SUV or not recycling? The more these radical environmentalists say the less credibility they are going to have when there really are environmental issues that need to be addressed. We need environmental solutions that we can really use on a wide scale rather than scare tactics or poor solutions to environmental issues that will come back to bite us in the ass.

The Expert answers:

You needn’t be so concerned about these things.

Compact fluorescent light bulbs REDUCE mercury pollution.

Fossil fuels contain mercury. Using incandescent bulbs causes more mercury to be emitted from power plants. More than is in a CFL.

It’s better if you dispose of old CFLs properly so that even the tiny amount of mercury is not released. But, no matter how they’re disposed of, CFLs reduce mercury pollution.

Http://www.cityofberkeley.info/sustainable/Powerplay%20articles/16Powerplay.Mercury.CFL.html

Serious environmentalists don’t claim global warming causes tsunamis. They also support the use of nuclear power to reduce global warming.

They support solutions that can be used on a wide scale, in particular these:

http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,481085,00.html

Yes, there are a few extreme environmentalists. Just as there are a few extreme conservatives who claim global warming is not caused by us, in spite of the overwhelming data. They’re not the majority, in either case.

Here’s what the majority of environmentalists (and the vast majority of scientists) believe about global warming. Solid peer reviewed data.

Http://www.ipcc.ch/SPM2feb07.pdf

http://www.ipcc.ch/SPM6avr07.pdf

By the way, I can’t believe anyone is still recommending the “swindle” movie, which has been thoroughly refuted.

It is simply a political statement which distorts science.

“The science might be bunkum, the research discredited. But all that counts for Channel 4 is generating controversy.”

http://environment.guardian.co.uk/climatechange/story/0,,2032572,00.html

Gore’s movie may be a little over dramatic, but it has the basic science right. This movie does not.

Channel 4 itself undercuts the movie in a funny way. If you go to their website on the movie you find links to real global warming information. They also say “Confused now? Ask the Expert.” The link for questions goes to a respected mainstream scientist who supports (mostly) human responsibility for global warming.

No one with any knowledge about global warming believes it. It’s one of those extreme and wrong things you’re worried about.

Michael asks…

When will Yahoo allow us users -their very reason to be- to post our comments?

EXTRA!!! Victims pay for The Media crimes.

We are in a democratic society, right? Well. I’m begining to doubt it. There is hardly a single, high traffic place in the web where you can comment on the news, politician statements, environmental issues etc. What is this? a Media DIctatorship? May be Hugo Chavez is right. We are hardly allowed any feedback at all on the streaming, overwhelming garbage we get everyday from the e-media. Wake up folks, we are in the 3D millenia. Open up the democratic windows!

I just read about Beatles’ “All You Need is Luvs” diapers ad. The author probably suffered a brain meltdown with his/her effort. Goodness Gracious!!! how cheap and low “art”.

Rather than abusively try to profit from someone else’s fame take a creative development intensive course.

Sadly there is no longer a place in YAHOO to comment on this. Shame on… someone.

The Expert answers:

Maybe you should start one and get rich?……The problem is they often become a racist forum.

Betty asks…

How can I contact U2 for a social justice appearance?

We are planning a 2007 Social Justice Forum in Atlanta Georgia and are interested in talking with U2 to see how we can get them envolved.

UNITED STATES SOCIAL FORUM

www.ussocialforum.org

JUNE 27- JULY 1, 2007 – ATLANTA, GEORGIA

be a part of this historic moment

The Forum plans to address four key current issuesthe Gulf Coast Crisis, Immigration, Environmental Justice, and War/Violence at home and abroad—through the lens of white supremacy, local/global economic justice, culture, and movement building. There will also be space for self-organized workshops that fall outside of the four issues, but are still deeply connected to the overarching lens.

At the ussf WE will……

· Convene more than 20,000 individuals from across the United States (we expect lots of international visitors) in Atlanta, Georgia.

· Strengthen the relationship between and among United States based organizations

· Provide space for political and economic education on issues facing all of us living in the Global South, especially the long-term effects of the Gulf Coast disaster and the War in Iraq.

· Provide an opportunity for essential leadership development of those in our community bases who are most affected by economic and racial injustice.

· Build a progressive infrastructure of grassroots and community-based organizations across the US South for long-term movement-building work.

The Expert answers:

Offer Bono lots of money. He’ll appear. Yeah, he pretends like he cares for the world and it’s problems, but he’s just using that to sell more records. He sucks.

Mandy asks…

What is the environmental impact of the 73 million pet dogs in the United States?

“# There are approximately 73 million owned dogs in the United States
# Thirty-nine percent of U.S. households own at least one dog
# Most owners (60 percent) own one dog
# Twenty-five percent of owners own two dogs
# Fourteen percent of owners own three or more dogs
# On average, owners have almost two dogs (1.7)
# The proportion of male to female dogs is about even
# Sixteen percent of owned dogs were adopted from an animal shelter
# On average, dog owners spent $211 on veterinary visits (vaccine, well visits) annually”

from http://www.hsus.org/pets/issues_affecting_our_pets/pet_overpopulation_and_ownership_statistics/us_pet_ownership_statistics.html

===============================================

Dogs consume natural resources just like humans, don’t they?

===============================================

The Expert answers:

So why don’t we all slow down with the breeding.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Translate »