Maria asks…
environmental movement a set up?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071214/ts_nm/bali_friday_dc
“They fear curbs would cramp economic growth.”
that exactly is the point behind the environmental movement. to cramp growth in China and India and leave natural resources to be consumed by the US and few others.
the illuminati has a plan to cut 80% of the world population, and this movement is the primary key, in addition to wars, such as that of iraq and afghanistan, orchestrated after the 9-11 controlled demolition events.
isn’t it interesting that the maniacs who started two world wars, the wars in korea, somalia, vietnam, and many others and destroyed the world in the process (just look at the destruction of the environment in hiroshima and nakazaki), want to “save” the world environment? isnt it a joke?
the illuminati is facing severe competition from China and iNdia and others, the illuminati is in serious panic. they use legitimate issues – such as the environment – to attain their selfish devilish ends.
“Uhh. Okay. Sure. Put the tinfoil fez back on, wouldn’t want CIA deathrays to getcha.”
unless you come up with another one, i’d assume that that is your BEST argument (which u use every time an idea takes u beyond your mind set).
The Expert answers:
Uhh. Okay. Sure. Put the tinfoil fez back on, wouldn’t want CIA deathrays to getcha.
David asks…
Is China doing well in their effort to destroy the Serengeti?
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_nQ5u79DOir4/TQBfR1hgaVI/AAAAAAAAABE/1ndPs48STDY/s1600/serengeti-map.jpg
http://www.savetheserengeti.org/issues/stop-the-serengeti-highway/#axzz1A4QcvIl7
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/08/100825103824.htm
http://mtwarakumekucha.blogspot.com/2010/09/serengeti-road-threatens-environmental.html
http://sites.google.com/site/zvezdaraforest/home/news-2
http://www.phoneforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2021
http://www.bellaonline.com/articles/art30936.asp
Let’s see now, how does this work?
Toss a few million at Tanzanian officials to authorize a “more efficient route for transporting heavy metals from the Lake Victoria region” through the Serengeti, when another less-destructive route is available.
Compensate the Tanzanians by offering low paying slave labor jobs in Chinese run mines where they are shot if they complain about working conditions.
Extract the natural resources (heavy metals) for China‘s own economic benefit in manufacturing unauthorized pirated versions of Western-designed cellphones so they can flood the market with them.
Make sure the new highway works towards decimating Tanzania’s #1 industry, Tourism, by assisting in destroying the natural migration of animals through the Serengeti Wildlife Preserve, which is not only a major tourist attraction, but also one of the top-10 natural wonders of the world.
Make Tanzania even more economically dependent upon the whims of the CCP, to hold them hostage in any future negotiations.
When is the world (read UN) going to wake up to the worldwide criminal behavior of CCP-led China and the mass-devastation to which it will lead?
Small countries may think they are getting a “piece of China‘s pie,” but all they are getting in the end is an empty plate.
The USA/West can live without a bunch of cheap cellphones on the market… can the world live without its wildlife?
Stop buying products Made in China!
Anyone who does so is promoting environmental destruction.
http://environment.change.org/blog/view/proposed_serengeti_highway_an_environmental_disaster_of_choice
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v467/n7313/full/467272a.html
The Expert answers:
Well from your links it does seem that China is causing more natural devastation around the world after successfully destroying millions of acres of some the world’s most fertile farmland and centuries old landmarks, and dislocating hundreds of thousands of people after building the 3 gorges damn. Now they have turned their environmental blind-eye to the African continent.
However, at the same time with out a major change in how goods are made, and who makes them this kind of thing is going to continue. Maybe it is better to shift jobs to India, and out of China. This should be the new global migration.
Mandy asks…
Is China doing well in its attempt to destroy the Serengeti?
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_nQ5u79DOir4/TQBfR1hgaVI/AAAAAAAAABE/1ndPs48STDY/s1600/serengeti-map.jpg
http://www.savetheserengeti.org/issues/stop-the-serengeti-highway/#axzz1A4QcvIl7
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/08/100825103824.htm
http://mtwarakumekucha.blogspot.com/2010/09/serengeti-road-threatens-environmental.html
http://sites.google.com/site/zvezdaraforest/home/news-2
http://www.phoneforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2021
http://www.bellaonline.com/articles/art30936.asp
Let’s see now, how does this work?
Toss a few million at Tanzanian officials to authorize a “more efficient route for transporting heavy metals from the Lake Victoria region” through the Serengeti, when another less-destructive route is available.
Compensate the Tanzanians by offering low paying slave labor jobs in Chinese run mines where they are shot if they complain about working conditions.
Extract the natural resources (heavy metals) for China‘s own economic benefit in manufacturing unauthorized pirated versions of Western-designed cellphones so they can flood the market with them.
Make sure the new highway works towards decimating Tanzania’s #1 industry, Tourism, by assisting in destroying the natural migration of animals through the Serengeti Wildlife Preserve, which is not only a major tourist attraction, but also one of the top-10 natural wonders of the world.
Make Tanzania even more economically dependent upon the whims of the CCP, to hold them hostage in any future negotiations.
When is the world (read UN) going to wake up to the worldwide criminal behavior of CCP-led China and the mass-devastation to which it will lead?
Small countries may think they are getting a “piece of China‘s pie,” but all they are getting in the end is an empty plate.
The USA/West can live without a bunch of cheap cellphones on the market… can the world live without its wildlife?
Stop buying products Made in China!
Anyone who does so is promoting environmental destruction.
http://environment.change.org/blog/view/proposed_serengeti_highway_an_environmental_disaster_of_choice
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v467/n7313/full/467272a.html
The Expert answers:
Nice. The Chinese aren’t just destroying their own country, they are doing it to others?
No more Chinese products for me. Thanks.
Joseph asks…
In what order are the issues that concern you the most in this election?
Here is the list of the issues that I see that the each candidate has different views on (in no particular order):
War On Terror / Afghanistan
Iraq
Homeland Security/Natural Disaster Preparedness
Other Foreign Policy (China, Russia, Israel, Iran, etc.)
Tax Policy
Financial Markets/Banking/Regulation
Trade Policy
Immigration Policy
Energy Policy (Oil, Natural Gas, Coal, Alternative Energy)
Environmental Policy
Health Care Policy/Regulation
Education
2nd Amendment Rights/Gun Control
Abortion
Definition of Marriage
Media Regulation (i.e. Fairness Doctrine)
Tort Law Policy
Infrastructure/Transportation Development
Social Security/Medicare Policy
Ethics/Lobbyist Reform
If I have forgotten any, please list…
The Expert answers:
War in Iraq
Economy
Health Care
Environment
Energy
Standing in the world (I’d like to be the ‘good guy’ again)
Robert asks…
Should abortion be used to prevent global warming?
Apparently, this idiot believes so…and you should not have more than 2 kids, if you do, you are irresponsible.
Question: What do you make of these comments? Is the left, attempting to make us into a China?
COUPLES who have more than two children are being “irresponsible” by creating an unbearable burden on the environment, the government’s green adviser has warned.
Jonathon Porritt, who chairs the government’s Sustainable Development Commission, says curbing population growth through contraception and abortion must be at the heart of policies to fight global warming. He says political leaders and green campaigners should stop dodging the issue of environmental harm caused by an expanding population.
A report by the commission, to be published next month, will say that governments must reduce population growth through better family planning.
“I am unapologetic about asking people to connect up their own responsibility for their total environmental footprint and how they decide to procreate and how many children they think are appropriate,” Porritt said.
“I think we will work our way towards a position that says that having more than two children is irresponsible. It is the ghost at the table. We have all these big issues that everybody is looking at and then you don’t really hear anyone say the “p” word.”
The Optimum Population Trust, a campaign group of which Porritt is a patron, says each baby born in Britain will, during his or her lifetime, burn carbon roughly equivalent to 2½ acres of old-growth oak woodland – an area the size of Trafalgar Square.
The British population, now 61m, will pass 70m by 2028, the Office for National Statistics says. The fertility rate for women born outside Britain is estimated to be 2.5, compared with 1.7 for those born here. The global population of 6.7 billion is expected to rise to 9.2 billion by 2050.
Porritt, who has two children, intends to persuade environmental pressure groups to make population a focus of campaigning.
“Many organisations think it is not part of their business. My mission with the Friends of the Earth and the Greenpeaces of this world is to say: ‘You are betraying the interests of your members by refusing to address population issues and you are doing it for the wrong reasons because you think it is too controversial,” he said.
Porritt, a former chairman of the Green party, says the government must improve family planning, even if it means shifting money from curing illness to increasing contraception and abortion.
He said: “We still have one of the highest rates of teenage pregnancies in Europe and we still have relatively high levels of pregnancies going to birth, often among women who are not convinced they want to become mothers.
ORCA, it seems you are the idiot.
Look at all the statistical facts regarding record number of snow falls.
(Saudi Arabia getting first snow and coldest winter in 20 years),
(in 07, South America had its coldest winter in 90 years)
NASA denying global warming as well.
Not to mention the ice levels are the same as it was in 1979.
The Expert answers:
Liberalism is a mental disorder.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers