Thomas asks…
Is Shark Fin soup illegal in Britain?
Is Shark Fin Soup illegal in Britain? (& U.S etc) I really hope it is, but I haven’t managed to find out.
The more I discover about this brutal business, it’s also an environmental issue…the more I think we should take sanctions against China.
We should be doing that already what with the Dog meat trade, but one thing at a time…..
The Expert answers:
First of all to “World’s tallest midget”, the reason why it’s considered a brutal business is that the sharks aren’t killed, shark’s meat in China is not worth much so the the fin is removed while the shark is still alive and then the creature is thrown back into the sea.
Imitation shark’s fin soup is made out of mung bean vermicelli shaped to resemble shark fins.
It is not illegal in Britain but should join the long list of products like Frois Gras which should be.
Donald asks…
Can you help me ? :)?
1. What approach to development did the Brundtland Commission propose? (1 point)
high density development
sustainable development
slow growth development
high impact development
2. A person who adapts an anthropocentric view
(1 point)
views environmental growth as economic and material growth.
is concerned with maintaining biodiveristy.
is concerned more with the survival of plant and animal life.
is concerned more with how the enviroment impacts people’s lives.
3. Which of the following is not an example of a sustainable development project? (1 point)
using renewable energy resources
planting new trees for future harvest
giving money to community-based groups that sell products made from renewable natural resources
financing projects to clear rainforest land for cattle grazing
4. Which is not an example of a goal that many countries agreed to have accomplished by 2015?
(1 point)
Provide global funding to hire highly qualified educators to teach abroad.
Donate millions of dollars to purchase affordable HIV medicines in high poverty areas globally
Send and distribute large quantities of food to Somalia and Ethiopia
Issue reparations to all countries that suffered high amounts of casualties from past major wars
5. What is the objective of the Dashboard of Sustainability?
(1 point)
to direct the UN MDGs to success by 2015
to assist citizens in ascertaining their individual “green footprint”
to illustrate the complex relationships among economic, social, and environmental issues
to guide Agenda21NOW! participants through the 24-hour conference
6. Which country’s action would be in violation of section II of the Agenda 21 plan?
(1 point)
The Brazilian government mandates the clearing of 200 acres in order to generate revenue from exported lumber.
China‘s government outlines tougher penalties for those factories that illegally dump waste into nearby water.
The United States raises vehicle emission standards and mandates more frequent emission testing for vehicles manufactured before 1985.
The Canadian government budgets 40 million dollars to eliminate contaminants from Lake Superior, Lake Huron, and Lake Ontario.
7. The adoption of the Agenda 21 comprehensive plan
(1 point)
only lasted weeks due to steadily deteriorating environmental conditions.
targets only those few countries with extreme environmental problems.
outlines local, national, and global efforts that would help improve the environment.
was a quick process that relied heavily on input from a select few countries.
8. Which person would most likely not be impacted by the Agenda 21 plan? (1 point)
CEO of a major waste processing firm
farmer
owner of a lumber company
scientist from NASA
9. Which of the following topics would not relate to substainable living? (1 point)
composting
transportation alternatives
single-use containers
water conservation
The Expert answers:
I will help u pass this class but i would like some help in return are u a senior this yr? Bc i am failing English and i really need help on this unit test that was due forever ago
Mandy asks…
isnt the pollution/”haze” in beijing terrible?? i think it is……surely this has gotta be harmful to the
health of the atheletes…..and surely the IOC could ahve taken this into accout when annoucing beijing as the next olympic city host…..please share your views…eevrytime i see it i just think “how horrible, all that pollution” and im not very big on environmental issues, i mean i respect them and do whatever i can, but its not a big thing in my life …..hmmmmm they said on the news that a typical day in Melbourne Australia produces 30 somethings per micrograms of pollution and in beijing it was 600 per microgram, thats massive!!!!!!!!! so bad!! why is it so bad in china??? is the ecconomy??? coz its so huge??
The Expert answers:
**I think it looks terrible and can’t imagine how bad it must be for the health of people who live there. It’s really sad to because on a clear day in Beijing the city actually looks nice but you can’t see it most of the time because of the haze.
There seems to be such a big deal made about climate change etc in Australia but if they look at Beijing they’ve got nothing to worry about.**
Carol asks…
What are you willing to give up to stop Global Warming? Driving, meat, having more then 1 child, how much?
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton took part in a roundtable discussion on environmental issues, and said afterwards that “one of the participants pointed out that it’s rather odd to talk about climate change and what we must do to stop and prevent the ill effects without talking about population and family planning.
CNN’s Jack Cafferty all but endorsed a global version of China’s oppressive one-child policy on Friday’s Situation Room. He repeated the argument of Canadian journalist Diane Francis, that population control is the only way to fight global warming
FUNNY THING HAPPENED ALONG THE WAY TO DOOMS DAY – 20 years ago I wrote a school paper on how the population bomb predictions of the 1960s had been so wrong and doom never happened then they admitted that their dooms day predictions of starvation and economic ruin for our world were so wrong because “they forgot to add in the work of the new population” These same nuts from the 1960s are running around Copenhagen asking that a “China like” one child global policy be put in to save the world from Global Warming. Same crowd new cause same old messed up thinking.
Are you ready whether you believe or not in Global Warming to give up YOUR FREEDOM to REPRODUCE? Don’t believe me google it.
The Expert answers:
Sir, I must tell you from a 16 year old’s perspective, a perspective that looks at his own future and knows that stuff like what you mention is in it. This is not global warming, it comes down to centralized wealth and propaganda from somewhere up top to put fear into our mind that we are in a crisis. They feed of us because we throw billions of dollars at our fears. I believe no one but myself these days, and when I go outside I see beauty in every living thing, I see change occurring when people least expect it, and I know this world can survive whatever we put it through. I’m not one to believe either global warming or that we are in an economic crisis. I am neither a meteorologist nor a wall street stock investor. I’m a 16 year old adolescent who wants the best for everyone around him, and believes that us falling for the tricks that propaganda brings to us will be the ultimatum purpose of death to wisdom and self reliance as we know it. Not a “hole” in the ozone.
William asks…
Famous political activist Dick Gregory currently on hunger strike for 9/11 truth. Was 9/11 an inside job?
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=20979
It was so painful for me as my wife Lil and I watched the events of September 11, 2001 on television. Seeing a plane hit the World Trade Center (WTC) North Tower at 8:46, then a second plane hit the South Tower at 9:02. Shortly, we saw the firefighters and other first responders courageously going into the buildings hoping to extinguish the fires, but it was impossible to foresee what followed.
Then we watched in shock as nearly a dozen people were jumping from the upper floors to their deaths.
We felt profound horror at 9:59 as the South Tower cascaded in freefall into its own footprint, and then 29 minutes later when the North Tower came down in the same impossible freefall way.
The new forensic evidence which is being released today by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth demonstrates the presence of controlled demolition materiel in the World Trade Center buildings One and Two.
Just one week after September 11, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Christine Todd Whitman declared “I am glad to reassure the people of New York and Washington DC that their air is safe to breathe and their water is safe to drink” and that we “. . . need not be concerned about environmental issues as [we return to [our] homes and workplaces”.
Yet to this day, at least 900 first responders have since died as a result of the effects of toxic “dust” from the buildings and the some 3,000 human remains that enveloped lower Manhattan and which Mayor Rudolph Giuliani declared “We must clear the rubble”. This “rubble” in fact constituted evidence from a massive crime scene, but was hauled away, first to Long Island, and then was eventually placed on barges and shipped to China.
One thing I know is that the official government story of those events, as well as what took place that day at the Pentagon, is just that, a story. This story is not the truth, but far from it.
I was born on October 12, 1932. I am announcing today that I will be consuming only liquids beginning Sunday until my eightieth birthday in 2012 and until the real truth of what truly happened on that day emerges and is publicly known.
Got this from 1,292 architects and engineers for 9/11 truth – http://www.ae911truth.org/
WTC Building #7, a 47-story high-rise not hit by an airplane, exhibited all the characteristics of classic controlled demolition with explosives:
1. Rapid onset of “collapse”
2. Sounds of explosions at ground floor – a second before the building’s destruction
3. Symmetrical “structural failure” — through the path of greatest resistance — at free-fall acceleration
4. Imploded, collapsing completely, and landed in its own footprint
5. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic dust clouds
6. Expert corroboration from the top European Controlled Demolition professional
7. Fore-knowledge of “collapse” by media, NYPD, FDNY
In the the aftermath of WTC7’s destruction, strong evidence of demolition using incendary devices was discovered:
8. FEMA finds rapid oxidation and intergranular melting on structural steel samples
9. Several tons of molten metal reported by numerous highly-qualified witnesses
10. Ch
The Expert answers:
Nice knowing him. Even if there *was* a conspiracy, 3,000 innocents died. What difference is his hunger strike?
Powered by Yahoo! Answers