Your Questions About Green Living

Susan asks…

What style of clothing should I wear?

ummm.
I like scene (like spongebob shirts, baggy but cute jumpers, black skinnies, etc)

or ummm indie (sorta like white tights, berets, skinny jeans, converse, black ‘school shoes‘, cute necklaces, ecofriendly colours, etc)

idk which one to go for?
but I don’t know who I am!
lool
and I hate wasting my money on crap that I don’t need. I need a theme so at least I have an objective. :S

The Expert answers:

Don’t ask people on Yahoo!Answers to choose your style. None of us know you in real life, so we don’t know what style would fit you best.

Ask your friends who know a lot about you…
OR
You don’t even have to chose what style. Wear WHAT YOU WANT. If one day you feel dressing rocker, with skinnies and converse and leather jacket, DO IT! If the next day you feel like dressing hippie, with headbands and tie die and sandals, DO IT!
Wear what you want! Wear what expresses your inside!

Hope I helped!

Nancy asks…

ECO *cute* ORGANIC CLOTHING?!?!?

I’m looking for clothes that are ecofriendly or help an organization. (cute t-shirts, shoes, sweatshirts)
but I’m not sure where to start….
websites?
I’m thinking something like www.tomsshoes.com

Any ideas?
seriously

some people have no lives.. no purpose

The Expert answers:

You’re HOT….http://www.ecomall.com/biz/clothing.htm Click on that to find DOZENS of eco-friendly sources. Enjoy!

Michael asks…

What are some humanitarian fashion trends?

I am looking for different clothing and accessory groups, for both girls and guys, that raise money for a cause. I allready have Tom’s Shoes and Clothing with a Cause, but what are some other ones? They can also be ecofriendly but I would prefer something that raises money for a specific charity or something.

The Expert answers:

Guess www.popreplicas.com is what website you are looking for
hope I help

Jenny asks…

Do I use a lot of description here? If so, how would I go about minimizing it? (story?

It’s everywhere, adverts for disposable shoes, ecofriendly motor scooters, reduced CO2 emission sports vehicles, reusable toilet paper and Nike. When you do anything public, you do it on ad space. You walk on linoleum, advertising the latest must-have gadgetry from Sony or the latest marketable, mediocre talented Disney starlet’s upcoming Coca-Cola World Tour, in the public bathrooms. The public bathroom is where the consumer is more vulnerable, whether the consumer has to sit down or stand up, because visual stimulation distractions relaxes you muscles and preoccupies your time being wasted… wasting. Men stare straight ahead (as to not be caught admiring their fellow urinal compadre) and stare straight into the asshole of capitalism. Most of the public bathrooms are privately owned by Kohler in the Pacific Northwest and they sell their ad space to every corporations from Apple to Walt Disney, the Corporations no longer worry about markets and target-audiences because the main objective and, arguably, the only objective is to sell, sell, sell. Advertising Agencies are a 20th century fad, whose main contribution to the world of Corporation was to desensitize Consumers enough that advertising was an extension of human decision making. Everything looks like a kaleidoscope of Consumer-friendly colours and literature. The entire world is trying to hawk brands at you and, unfortunately fortunately for Consumers, you buy, buy, buy. Every day, brands are making their ways into the dictionary; detergent was forced to give it’s meaning to Tide, toilet paper bullied to give it’s meaning to Charmin, tissue was blown out of the nose of the nose of the individual into a Kleenex, instant noodles were micro waved Ramen, every day brands become neologistic insurrections. University campuses and Primary playgrounds are corporate jam sessions; where everything from the benches to the monkey bars are logo’d. Caterpillar Monkey Bars and benches are floosies when it comes to ad space. The wallpaper in this bathroom and, in fact, schools, office buildings, convenient stores are Procter & Gamble owned. All brands sell ad space to brands and we’re caught in the crosshairs of these kissing cousins. Ads on top of ads on top of ads on top of humanity. We, no longer have quarrels about religion, life, love, friendship or sex but where you can find the best deal on Tide Brand tide or some brand or other. The way technology crept into your day to day life, advertising has accomplished with technology taking a supporting role and billed as Medium of Communications. Advertising was the tortoise in a race between Any Other Form of Mind Control vs. Avaricious Wants, Greed and Commodities. Religion only appeared to be winning. Advertising has taken over our life, one medium of communication at a time.

At present time, there is a bidding war between Coca- Cola and McDonald’s where the item being auctioned off is United States of (insert brand name here). It’s all very simple, people just got tired of choosing and with super brands taking out all of it’s competition our choices became severely limited. Brands decided to cash in on our limitations by buying more ad space and buying out everything from education to recreation or is it procreation? Since, weddings were being sponsored by some brand or another. And Corporations buying out children’s futures by paying the parents of the child thousands of dollars if they named the child Pepsi or Apple and the most common boy name in 2041 was the Nike swoosh.

It started with television, we all were desensitized and nobody/nothing stepped into to rub us with lubricate us with original ideas because in a brand world even respectable educational programming was cramming the latest everything down your metaphysical gullet with sporadic and random pop ups during History programmes of the Third Reich of McDonald’s sponsoring the programme you are currently watching. With virtually everyone in the “civilized” world desentised to megalo-branding, brands started to sensitize Consumers with whatever it was they were hawking at the beginning of this take over. Earth has been lowered in rank to share holder. You can also buy your shares of rain forests, woodlands, deserts and, most profitable in 2037-41, Alaskan wilderness. The way people use to be able to have a tree planted in their name, they have Kohler water fountains in the Mojave Desert with “Tom and Linda’s Kohler Water Fountain for a Better Tomorrow” written on the side… and the sad thing is that many took this sham as similar to the tree fiasco. Also, do not be alarmed by the Colgate-Palmolive safe havens in the Alaskan wilderness. Alas, the water is supplied by Coca-Cola owned Dasani.

The Expert answers:

Your essay is a stream of consciousness, an unreadable collage of thought…
Ask yourself:
1. Who is the audience you want to influence?
2. What is the message you want to convey?
3. What is the desired outcome?
Answer these questions and you will distill your message.

Helen asks…

I would like a pair of shoes…?

I would like a pair of shoes, like vans slip-on style or maybe flats. Possibly ecofriendly. not in-your-face, but also not subdued. sonething to wear with skinny jeans. Currently i own a pair of purple lace-up vans. Im kind of looking for something less brand name. But i definitely still like my current ones.

The Expert answers:

Try here:
http://www.alternativeoutfitters.com
Macbeth, Simple, and Draven brands also have some very eco-friendly styles.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Your Questions About Green Living

James asks…

Degree in Renewable energy?

I am interested in saving the world‘s problems and it’s addiction to big oil..lol

There are few colleges that offer a degree in renewable energy, but I am not sure if I should go for a specific degree like that. How about studying Bachelor’s in chemical engineering or Biotechnology and then studying masters in renewable energy?

Any ideas are welcome.

Thanks

The Expert answers:

I just hate chemistry.

Susan asks…

Renewable Energy Question?

Please share your thoughts in detail to help me?

cold fusion has been belittled, ridiculed and basically dismissed by the scientific community since 1989 when Fleischmann and Pons “jumped the gun” during a press conference. There is evidence that cold fusion is within reach of becoming a viable option as a renewable energy source, and that it would basically change the world economy. Check out the following article:
http://www.columbiatribune.com/news/2009/may/30/evidence-favoring-cold-fusion-as-energy-source/

The Expert answers:

The scientific community is shy on this because of the history of what some said was fraud. Teams of scientists will work on this, but my bet is that there is not enough evidence for a reasonable person to accept that the affect (effect?) has been shown.

Laura asks…

Can you believe how much energy we waste?

I’m in the middle of a project for college here. Some interesting facts: Oil production peaked in the mid seventies, natural gas production will peak in 2020, the most efficient engine we use at the moment is the diesel engine which is approx 40% efficient for the fuel put in to the work done. Renewable energy (solar, wind, tidal, etc) still only accounts for a tiny percentage of the energy we use! We are totally screwed! We still breed like rabbits and still don’t treat the world responsibly! At this rate the world will be out of resources within 100 years, by then we’ll HAVE to use renewable sources of energy but the pollutants that will exist then will have completely b*ggered up the planet! Any thoughts?
Jeez Kev, that’s a bit harsh, not getting any? In fact they reckon the population will increase and hold at approximately 10 billion by 2050. We are indeed using more oil than ever but the overall number of SOURCES of oil has not been increasing since the seventies. Read the question and don’t make assumptions. Live and let live. And lose the superior attitude.

The Expert answers:

Hey T M Good Question.

Have a look at [Link 1] I think it will help flesh out your project.

Focusing in on the population curve: have you wondered why it’s shown to flatten out (sigmoid growth)? And more importantly do you believe that it will simply flatten out? [Link 2 & 3]

I think we’re in for a bit of boom and bust regards global population levels. Declining fertility rates (not contraception) and lack of access to basic requirements (clean food and water) will eventually mean that the population will reach equilibrium – a starvation equilibrium. But declinig natural resources, shifting enironmental conditions, competition for scarsening resources and habitable areas (leading to wars – and we’ve seen that in Iraq already) combined with the environmental impact of global warming; put all this together and I recon we’re headed for a population crash.

Best wishes LT

PS: Making statements that could possibly be construded as acknowledging the bleeding obvious, namely that we are trashing the planet big time and that we are, for example responsible for global warming – is a rather contentious area and as you have seen with at least one respondent, likely to lead to a ‘naysyaer’ back lash. Don’t be put off – you’re spot on with your observations – and remember the debate on environmental issue has now moved on – the debate is OVER, we are screwing up the environment and behaving irresponsibly, that’s now the offical position. However, for some people no matter how much evidence is brought forward, no matter how bad the weather gets or how many species go extinct, no matter how many people starve to death or are displaced from their homes due to rising sea levels or drought or other climatic changes, they’ll never believe that it’s us to blame – that’s because they have alterior motives (namely vested self interest, greed and/or stupidity) which are over riding their morals (assuming they have any) and common sense (again assuming they have any).

Ruth asks…

Will civilized countries develop renewable energy sources…”?

voluntarily to avoid world bankruptcy and famine, or will we wait until there is no more oil and we experience the resulting devastation and ultimate total world war?
yasiru89 – I agree with your first statement. I was very surprised when YA directed my question to philosophy. I don’t know what triggered the category choice.

The Expert answers:

This doesn’t belong in philosophy. However I shall afford an opinion in any case.

Civilised nations, or more relavantly countries with most influence (say G8) will probably push towards the very last minute without much going for long term solutions. Since change is not easily given initiative granted that something already works even when that is threatened.
We would indeed be heading towards some great economic discomfort in this sense and the rise from such will mainly involve short term plans.

Carol asks…

Would renewable energy sources be enough to cover for nuclear power?

Ok, brace yourselves, this is for a debate that we’re doing at school and I’m the lead debater. The affirmative side is “nuclear power SHOULD be used in the modern world.” The negative side is “shouldn’t”.

My question is only because the negative side might ask us about this and stump us, and I wanna be ready with all the answers.

So, say we started using nuclear power more around the world. And we don’t have to worry about waste storage facilities, either, since we supposedly found a solution to that. But then, this guy comes along and tells us that we could be using renewable energy sources, like wind or solar power instead of the nuclear power we’re now using all over the world. And suppose we actually started doing that.
Would renewable energy sources be able to produce the same amount of energy that nuclear power was?

Oh god, that is so crucial. Simple answers are fine, but I would appreciate any help on the debate itself – I’m actually working on my speech right now. I need things that we can say to drown out the negative team’s theories and ideas. We need to defeat them good.
mark, I really don’t get what you’re saying.

The Expert answers:

Simple if we plant to many wind turbines etc than we can sure outrun nuclear power as on earth tap able energy from renewable sources is more than our need but presently we have not cost effective method new research are in phase hope so soon we get result

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Your Questions About Green Living

Jenny asks…

How can we make these things sustainable?

How can we reduce growing Crops for food, feed, and fibre such as cotton.
And how can we reduce making room for infrastructure such as roads and housing.

The Expert answers:

If we focused on transit concepts like PRT which can compete with the convenience of the automobile then the road infrastructure could be a lot less than they are today. Rain collection can reduce the need for water. If we encourage urban agriculture, we can make labor intensive small scale plots possible and reduce transportation costs. Fibrous material like cotton can be readily produced by modified bacteria or yeast in large vats. We have had the technological solutions to be sustainable, just not the economic or political will to do so.

Mary asks…

Are some agricultural practices or seafood harvesting methods more sustainable than others?

This is with regard to sustaining food, fresh air and water

The Expert answers:

Certainly. Agriculturally, it is important to preserve topsoil. Excessive tillage reduces topsoil to dust, which resulted in the “dust bowl” in 1930’s U.S. And can also result in useful topsoil ending up in runoff to rivers. Overgrazing – especially with goats, will also cause topsoil breakdown.
Bottom trawling is very destructive of bottom habitat, turning areas with bottom structure that provides cover for young fish and crustaceans into sandy underwater deserts.
These are just two examples of destructive practices. For info about helpful practices, search on “permaculture” and “Seawater Foundation”

Daniel asks…

where can I find inexpensive land to build a self sustainable community?

I am looking to build energy efficient and eco friendly housing, with the goal of developing a community that can sustain itself in every way possible. from food to energy, water treatment. using underground/earth sheltered construction and combining any or all methods to achieve these goals.

The Expert answers:

There are a lot of these self sustainable communities in the UK, many are in Wales but they are everywhere. The best way to find inexpensive land is to search these existing communities. They will help you, they always know about nearby suitable sites and local planning laws, pitfalls etc.
Http://www.evnuk.org.uk/wessex.html
http://www.chickenshack.co.uk/
http://www.diggersanddreamers.org.uk/
http://thatroundhouse.info/permacultureland.htm
http://www.thehouseplanner.co.uk/courses.html
http://www.radicalroutes.org.uk/housing.html

William asks…

I want to make a large sustainable rabbit litter box for three house rabbits with soil, any insights?

I’m thinking of building a lined wood box about 3’X3’X3′ and filling it halfway with soil and a layer of hay on top with a ramp and food bowls inside. I figure I can just keep turning over the soil indefinately if it works right but I am just guessing at this point. Any pointers?

The Expert answers:

Get a big covered cat litter box they come as big as 1’x2’x1’x2 that should work well?

Michael asks…

I’m writing a paper on how to redesign the food supply system for San Francisco. Any ideas?

I have a paper I’m writing about how to provide large volumes of affordable, sustainable and local food to San Franciscans. The idea is to come up with policies that can be implemented both inside and outside the city to encourage production, consumption and recycling of local, sustainable foods. These are some ideas I have already: a carbon tax on high carbon foods, a water tax on water consuming foods, shifting agribusiness funds to organic growers, purchasing land in the valley in name of San Francisco and hiring growers to use the land under long term lease, offering prisoners training and experience in return for labor and reduced prison sentences, redeveloping electric rails to San Francisco to bring volumes of food stuffs in at a reduced price and carbon cost, creating tax or economic incentives for local residents to grow and compost their own food, offering food sold under a city brand in most neighborhoods for easy access at a sliding scale so more can afford it, setting up a school in city to train local growers and develop local cultivars, focus on growing perennial plants, redeveloping abandoned warehouses into greenhouses, establish an urban development zone to contain future development both in the city and around the farm land. I’m sure there’s more I could so with this. Does anyone have more ideas and especially know of any concrete examples of similar projects being done on a large scale?

The Expert answers:

Just north of you in Marin County is the company called Marin Organic. Maybe you can contact someone their for some help possibly with your project. Here’s an article about them from Point Reyes Light.

Http://www.ptreyeslight.com/Point_Reyes_Light/News_2011/Entries/2011/2/17_Marin_Organic_director_resigns.html

This next article is about my Uncle John and his continuous efforts to grow sustainable, nutritious, cheap organic foods. He’s quite an intelligent guy and is from Bolinas. He is currently working in the Mt Shasta area.

Http://www.ptreyeslight.com/Point_Reyes_Light/Home/Entries/2010/8/26_West_Marins_homegrown_security.html

Good luck with what sounds like a great project !!

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Your Questions About Green Living

Betty asks…

Alternative Fuels Question?

Shouldn’t we build the infrastructure to store the energy we already waste at night?
Also build to store the energy the nukes could be producing as they ramp them down 60-75% at night?
This would be about 5%.
We could store the energy at night, then use it during peak times.
Since you will need storage to make any alternative energy, (except hydraulic) viable, ins’t storing already wasted energy the first option?
Wouldn’t that eliminate more gas consumer than solar/wind.
Without storage we won’t be able to take any existing plants offline.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/7598212.stm

The Expert answers:

Absolutely– Nuclear which is a “stable” energy source puts out energy 24 hours a day– even when it is not at peak load. This energy could be used to produce hydrogen which could be stored for other energy uses. Even wind power could be used to make hydrogen at off peak times.

Unfortunately our politicians don’t know where the on-off switch is on a computer — much less how to write a comprehensive energy plan.

Carol asks…

Did Hillary lie when she accuses Obama’s vote on the 2005 Energy Bill as having hurt America?

According to MSNBC’s Dan Abrams, Hillary has been untruthful and she distorts the facts. The Energy Bill – which Hillary rejected – actually was profitable for America.
It raised taxes SLIGHTLY On The Oil Industry As A Whole. Although the Energy Policy Act of 2005 contained $14.3 billion in tax breaks, most of those breaks were for electric utilities, nuclear power plants, alternative fuels research and subsidies for energy efficient cars and homes.

AP also reported The AP reported, “Clinton is on shakier ground when attacking Obama for supporting “Dick Cheney’s energy bill,” and not just because it’s a stretch to assign the vice president name – red meat to Democrats – to the legislation. The 2005 act that she describes as packed with billions of dollars in oil industry breaks actually raised taxes on the oil and gas industry by about $300 million over 11 years, according to the Congressional Research Service. The nonpartisan analysis found $2.6 billion in tax cuts for the oil and gas industry and $2.9 billion in tax increases. The bulk of tax breaks went to other sources of energy, including alternative fuels favored by both Clinton and Obama.” [AP, 2/15/08]
Obama Worked Consistently to Improve Energy Bill, Which Took Important Step Towards Energy Independence. When Obama first voted for the bill, he said that he voted for the bill reluctantly and that he was disappointed with the missed opportunity to do something bolder to move the country towards energy independence by recognizing the importance of a fuel alternative. Obama played a leadership role in promoting seven amendments that strengthened the 2005 bill when it was on the floor and did not stop fighting to strengthen the bill after it was passed, introducing legislation in 2007 to end some of the most egregious tax breaks for the oil industry that were part of the 2005 bill. [HR 6, Vote 139, 6/15/06; SA 851 to HR 6, Passed by UC, 6/23/05; HR 6, Vote 141, 6/16/05; HR 6, Vote 145, 6/21/05; SA 919 to HR 6, Passed by UC, 6/23/05; 110th, S. 115, Referred to Finance, 1/4/07; S. 133, Introduced 1/4/07; S. 767, Passed Commerce Committee, 5/8/07]
http://obama.senate.gov/news/050728-tax_credit_for_e85_fuel_in_ene/
2005-2007: Obama Introduced Legislation Repealing Tax Breaks And Other Perks For the Oil Industry, Requiring Yearly Increases In CAFE Standards, And Requiring Significant Increases In Renewable Fuel Mandates And Alternative Energy Incentives. Since 2005, Obama has introduced legislation suspending the 2005 energy bill’s tax incentives and other perks for the oil industry in the Energy Policy Act of 2005, requiring significant increases in the renewable fuel mandates over the next few years, requiring yearly increases in CAFÉ standards, and providing incentives for E-85 fuel pump installation, alternative vehicle research and production. [S. 115, 110th Congress; S. 23, 110th Congress; S. 133, Introduced 1/4/07; S. 2202, Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works. 10/18/2007 S. 2984, 109th Congress; S. 1324, Introduced 5/7/07; Press Release, 5/7/07]

The Expert answers:

Hasn’t it already been established that Barack is the liar in this campaign?

Susan asks…

Did Hillary lie when she accuses Obama’s vote on the 2005 Energy Bill has hurt America?

According to MSNBC’s Dan Abrams, Hillary has been untruthful and she distorts the facts. The Energy Bill – which Hillary rejected – actually was profitable for America.
It raised taxes SLIGHTLY On The Oil Industry As A Whole. Although the Energy Policy Act of 2005 contained $14.3 billion in tax breaks, most of those breaks were for electric utilities, nuclear power plants, alternative fuels research and subsidies for energy efficient cars and homes.

AP also reported The AP reported, “Clinton is on shakier ground when attacking Obama for supporting “Dick Cheney’s energy bill,” and not just because it’s a stretch to assign the vice president name – red meat to Democrats – to the legislation. The 2005 act that she describes as packed with billions of dollars in oil industry breaks actually raised taxes on the oil and gas industry by about $300 million over 11 years, according to the Congressional Research Service. The nonpartisan analysis found $2.6 billion in tax cuts for the oil and gas industry and $2.9 billion in tax increases. The bulk of tax breaks went to other sources of energy, including alternative fuels favored by both Clinton and Obama.” [AP, 2/15/08]
Obama Worked Consistently to Improve Energy Bill, Which Took Important Step Towards Energy Independence. When Obama first voted for the bill, he said that he voted for the bill reluctantly and that he was disappointed with the missed opportunity to do something bolder to move the country towards energy independence by recognizing the importance of a fuel alternative. Obama played a leadership role in promoting seven amendments that strengthened the 2005 bill when it was on the floor and did not stop fighting to strengthen the bill after it was passed, introducing legislation in 2007 to end some of the most egregious tax breaks for the oil industry that were part of the 2005 bill. [HR 6, Vote 139, 6/15/06; SA 851 to HR 6, Passed by UC, 6/23/05; HR 6, Vote 141, 6/16/05; HR 6, Vote 145, 6/21/05; SA 919 to HR 6, Passed by UC, 6/23/05; 110th, S. 115, Referred to Finance, 1/4/07; S. 133, Introduced 1/4/07; S. 767, Passed Commerce Committee, 5/8/07]
http://obama.senate.gov/news/050728-tax_credit_for_e85_fuel_in_ene/
2005-2007: Obama Introduced Legislation Repealing Tax Breaks And Other Perks For the Oil Industry, Requiring Yearly Increases In CAFE Standards, And Requiring Significant Increases In Renewable Fuel Mandates And Alternative Energy Incentives. Since 2005, Obama has introduced legislation suspending the 2005 energy bill’s tax incentives and other perks for the oil industry in the Energy Policy Act of 2005, requiring significant increases in the renewable fuel mandates over the next few years, requiring yearly increases in CAFÉ standards, and providing incentives for E-85 fuel pump installation, alternative vehicle research and production. [S. 115, 110th Congress; S. 23, 110th Congress; S. 133, Introduced 1/4/07; S. 2202, Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works. 10/18/2007 S. 2984, 109th Congress; S. 1324, Introduced 5/7/07; Press Release, 5/7/07]

The Expert answers:

I would have to actually see Hillary’s lips…If they moved, she lied

Richard asks…

Woo-hoo finally a serious energy bill?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071218/ap_on_go_co/congress_energy

will raise standards for appliances, increase alternative energy production, and make the fleet gas mileage requirment on new cars to be 35mpg and include trucks and SUVs in that calculation. Suprisingly, Bush says he intends to sign it too. I think this will solve a lot of problems personally. Do you support/disagree?
small cars are much cheaper to build than big SUVs, and if everyone is driving smaller cars people will feel less of a need to buy a big car to keep up with the Joneses, you will need less gas, plus demand will go down which can lower price

The Expert answers:

It won’t solve any ‘problems’, but it’s nice to have the choice to buy more efficient devices.

I am a strong supporter of Bush’s progress on clean Geothermal/Hydrogen energy. I wish the news would tell the public about this so more people could get involved. This is the best possible clean energy future our nation can have!

William asks…

Give me a good reason to disagree with Brodman’s view? ?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081001/ap_on_re_eu/eu_france_us_nuclear;_ylt=AgJ.Win4nWk1pLvWzA6q3S50bBAF

Mine is that taking on so much additional debt trying to retool instead of manage a financial crisis will extend the defecit to such an extent that America will not only lose its credit rating but will not be able to raise the funds for Nuclear or Alternative Energy.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081001/ap_on_re_eu/eu_france_us_nuclear;_ylt=AgJ.Win4nWk1pLvWzA6q3S50bBAF

The Expert answers:

Many things are going to be cut and we will end up paying more taxes for less if this bailout passes -dont think for a minute the ceiling on this wont be raised time and again after it is passed

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Your Questions About Green Living

James asks…

Iceland offers free parking for Eco friendly cars,should USA have the same deal,…?

http://www.icelandreview.com/icelandreview/daily_news/?cat_id=40764&ew_0_a_id=286879

The Expert answers:

USA hardly even has any eco friendly cars yet! Those hybrids are a joke, they get less mpg every year

Charles asks…

Why is it not eco friendly to buy a new car?

I read that it’s more eco friendly to keep your old car than to spring for the new eco car.

The Expert answers:

It is not eco friendly to buy new items even if the claim is that the product is green, it is actually greener not to buy anything. Eco friendly is not really eco friendly it is less unfriendly than conventional products. Green products are greenER than conventional products not really GREEN. The bes thing to do is keep using what you have until it falls to pieces, then if you can don’t replace it, or look to rent if it is one off use or buy second hand if you use it regularly.

Not having a car at all is much more environmentally friendly than any CLAIMED eco friendly car.

The issue is this, there are environmental costs in sourcing the materials, production of the equipment to manufacture the materials and buildings etc to manufacture them in, the manufacture of the product itself, transportation, use and disposal of the product and its wastes etc This is known as embodied energy (the cost of to the environment of everything that actually went into making that item).

So keep using what you have but try to use it less. Walk or cycle more and use public transport instead of your car, then you will be genuinely more eco friendly. Just because people want to sell you an eco friendly product does not mean it is really friendly to the environment, nor does it mean you should buy it.

Thomas asks…

eco-friendly cars under 50,000?

The Expert answers:

Prius

Helen asks…

Plz. give info on eco- friendly cars?

The Expert answers:

Eco friendly cars are ones which minimize their damage to the environment. While hybrids immediately come to mind, there are other cars which are eco-friendly too. Small cars with smaller engines use less fuel to drive. Some good choices for small cars are honda civics, toyota corolla or if you like hatchbacks honda fit. Hybrids can be very fuel efficient (like the toyota prius) but they also make larger hybrid cars and suv’s which are no more efficient than small cars. You must also take into account the impact of the batteries which are used in hybrids. They use rare materials on earth for their batteries which is what makes them expensive. It has been argued that the toyota prius’ complex production process does more environmental harm than the car saves in fuel in its lifetime. If you are in the market for a new car, i would simply look for the one with the highest fuel economy rating that suits your DAILY needs. If you mostly just drive to work every day and or get groceries, but once a year need to move a piece of furniture it doesnt mean you need a truck. A small car will do 99.9 % of the time and save you money.

Ruth asks…

currently, what is the safest, most eco-friendly car?

i am all about giving back to my community and my earth. i have a daughter and as a single mother i am trying to set a good example so that when she grows she too will want to give back. that being said, i need a safe car and one that will reduce my carbon footprint. so what is the most eco friendly and the safest car on the market right now?

The Expert answers:

Zap Smartcar

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Your Questions About Green Living

Donald asks…

what is the relation between poverty and the environmental issues?

describe “poverty” as it relates to environmental issues.

The Expert answers:

On a macro level, poorer economies tend to have lower environmental standards, hence, very often, some production processes that are now outlawed in developed economies end up being done in poorer countries; for example India and Bangladesh have industries where ships with poisonous chemicals are basically broken down manually, to the detriment of environment and worker health in these countries. Http://toxicslink.org/ovrvw-sub.php?prognum=3&intnum=7&subnum=10&area=3

The sad truth is that the environment and poor people are often the last things that people think of when business is concerned; the workers in these shipyards for example would rather work there at the risk of their own health to provide for heir families rather than be jobless and be even worse off (at least in the short run). Only when most people’s basic needs are met, will people start thinking of the environment.

If you look at the history of EUrope even; during the industrial revolution, when masses were poor, even if everyone saw the smog and pollution, people still worked in bad and unhealthy conditions, sacrificing environment and health for some wealth. Only as the countries grew wealthier did he environment become a topic for discussion.

Hence I would say that poverty leads to more exploitation of the environment.

If you look at a more micro level, you can compare daily activities of families; in poor countries, sometimes firewood is used for cooking. This does lead to carbon emissions. On the other hand, in rich countries people drive gas guzzlers to go to work. Which do you think causes more environmental damage, a humvee driven for two hours, or a small stove lit for two hours? In which case is there a more realistic choice – firewood or raw food, or humvee or hybrid car?

Again, people in richer countries have the means to make envirometally sounder choices, and I think they should, remembering that afterall the riches of today’s developed nations were built on environmental damage caused many many years ago.

Thomas asks…

how can i incorporate environmental issues into a fairy tale?

i have a project where i have to perform a skit dealing with environmental issues but in the form of a classic fairy tale (3 little pigs, cinderella, etc). your ideas would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advanced.

The Expert answers:

I think the global warming skeptics consider “alarmists” to be something like chicken little, making much out of insufficient data.

Richard asks…

Why should the American economy take precedent over environmental issues?

I’m currently working on a research paper on this topic and I can’t come up with anymore reasons for why the American economy should take precedent over environmental issues. If is their anyone who agrees with this and could help me come up with more reasons?

The Expert answers:

The reasons to support the economy over the environment are just short sighted. Our natural resources should be at the core our future wealth. National forest, minerals, oil, and our fish and wildlife are the things we protect for pour future. The crops that feed the nation are more important than industry. If the economy collapses we will emerge stronger than the whole world…We pressured Russia to a restructuring and they have not done well but now they are roaring back. Just a few ideas to look at.

Mark asks…

Can anyone point me to a good website about the environmental issues in Colombia?

I am doing research and I am trying to find a good website to find info for the environmental and future environmental issues in colombia.

The Expert answers:

This might not help but – http://www.columbia.edu/cu/mpaenvironment/

aussie

Helen asks…

What are some environmental issues in Bryce Canyon Nat’l Park?

I’m making a brochure on Bryce Canyon for Geography class and I need to know Environmental issues, soil characteristics, and Natural Feature descriptions.

The Expert answers:

Restriction of 4wheelers and motorcycles

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Your Questions About Green Living

Paul asks…

What is the role of science and technology in attaining sustainable development?

it is for our forum on our school.that’s our topic.

The Expert answers:

Sustainable development is development that makes sure we use the earth’s resources in a way that is not wasteful so that future generations can have stuff left over. Also, development that doesn’t harm people or nature. You could give examples of technology that can be used to reduce the use of fossil fuels like oil and gas.

Selling music on the internet reduces the number of cds that need to made, packaged and sold (as well as the fuel used to transport them).

Other examples are
-The electric car
-Solar power
-energy efficient lightbulbs

Nancy asks…

Looking for organizations in Beijing thi for sustainable development?

Similar to AIESEC. I’m looking for an organization in Beijing, China that focuses on education for sustainable development.

Can anyone name me a few? thanks.

The Expert answers:

Better consult some Chinese government web site.

David asks…

What can I do with a double major in English and Sustainable Development?

I considered history but both seem like they’d be just as good, and all three would hopefully get me a good job traveling the world.

But what exactly could I do with a double major like that?

The Expert answers:

I don’t mean to sound rude, but that last entry was completely useless. I have a degree in English and I am not a secretary, nor did my degree prepare me to be a secretary. Further, colleges all have different policies (even state schools within a particular state function differently) and you may be able to double major as a freshman, which I did.

A degree in English means that you have highly developed reading, writing, and critical thinking skills. You might work well in a public relations position, in a writing/editing position, or in any job that requires creative and adaptive thinking skills. It is a flexible degree, meaning it doesn’t necessarily prepare you for a particular position or career track (how limiting!).

There has been a lot of expansion in “green” or “eco-friendly” jobs recently, and they are about as diverse as they are competitive. A degree in sustainable development may land you a job doing research in the field, developing products or awareness around a particular type of sustainable resource, or coordinating conservation programs for companies. If you check job search postings you can find more details about the types of jobs and salaries in this field in your area.

I will say that a degree in English may complement sustainable development well, because a lot of research-based and emerging fields (like sustainability) rely on grants for funding positions and programs. With an English degree you may develop just the writing skills you need to write grants, which is a very valuable asset in an employee, particularly for small and non-profit organizations.

Having these degrees would be beneficial on a global scale, too, as sustainable practices are spreading around the globe. A degree in English is also helpful in developing communication skills, which are vital in any sort of international field.

I recommend checking with an advisor at your college/university. Advisors should be able to discuss job prospects and can help you choose majors/minors that suit your interests and career goals. They can also speak to the credibility of your school’s programs and help you look at other schools if they are better for your academic needs.

Best of luck!

Lizzie asks…

Who implements sustainable development plan in Europe?

I am interested to know who implements the plan in European countries, and if it is possible even in USA and other countries?

The Expert answers:

* The European Energy and Climate Policy:
————————————————————–
=> Proposed by the Directorate General of Environment (DG ENV) and the Directorate for Energy (both part of the Commission)
=> Based on approaches and recommandations/inputs from independant private consultants
=> Input from the civil society (industry lobbies and NGOs as well)
=> Final legislative package decided by the directorates
=> Vote by the EU Parliament
=> Once a directive has been implemented by the parliament it is mandated that national states translate it into their national law.

* National laws of EU countries:
————————————————————–
* For example, garuanteed purchase price for renewable electricity (as first implemented in Germany), known as “feed-in tariff
* Based on EU aggregated goal for renewable energy (20% by 2020) and the split of the effort into national goals
* Put in national legislations

Some US states and even developing countries (total of 50 countries) have adopted equivalents of the european concept of feed-in tariff for renewable power generation

Low chances of similar sustainable development goals in the US as a result of MUCH MORE DIFFICULT AND SLOW POLICY MAKING. The reasons are: dogma of parties, low consensus, low interest and off course the lobbying of established industries which prefer to fight change than to adapt.

Mary asks…

How can we have a sustainable development for overfishing?

I really need this for an important project. Please help!

The Expert answers:

Fisheries!

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Your Questions About Green Living

George asks…

Short term stocks to invest in? Stocks for long term?

Right now a lot of stocks are at an all time low, Is there particular stocks that i can watch and invest in make money in a short period of time. Like Ford, they went down to 1.90 then they came out and said they dont think they need the bail out money and there stock went up +120%.

New administration is coming into office and they have talked a lot about alternative energy funds, this makes me think for the next couple of year energey and renewable energy industry like: nuclear, cheasePeak and other companies will do good. So my second question is what are good long term industries/stocks to invest in? (symbols of the companies if you know any particular ones)

The Expert answers:

Long term – Strong financial companies such as Bank of America (BAC) or Goldman Sachs (GS)

Short term – General Motors (GM), E*Trade Financial @ $1 – 1.15 strike(ETFC)

A note on GM, you could very well lose your entire investment if they do not get a bailout. Also the bailout won’t make their stock price go as high as many people think it will, my guess is in the $7-9 range but not instantly.

Laura asks…

Do you think we should regulate the trading of stocks much more than we do?

Think about this. The stock marekt consists of a lot of people who get rich from buying and selling stocks. And these people get rich because they are some of the smartest in the country, and have gotten really good at reading the market.

Now I ask you, what value do these people add to society??? I don’t see it. It seems to me that all they’re doing is a form of legalized gambling.

Now what if we were to take all of these highly intelligent people and ask them to come up with cheap alternative energy, or something of that nature? Sounds like a good idea no?

And speaking of energy. Did you know that the reason why the price of oil is where it is today is mostly due to speculation. Current market fundamentals do not actually support $96/barrel oil. Supplies are actually decent right now. Yes, of course the price would still be high, but not $96/barrel. (I work for an oil company)

What do you think?
From me to you: I agree that the stock market itself does have value. My issue is with how shares are traded without creating any new wealth. Seems like a zero sum game to me.

Yes, I think I could teach a class on what makes up the price of oil. I just don’t think the speculation part is necessary.
Samuel D: Obviously not, but surely there is something highly intelligent people can contribute to society.

The Expert answers:

It takes money to “play” the stock market, and without money, businesses wouldn’t prosper. Businesses need the stock market and investors. If investors make money by picking and choosing the right companies, what’s wrong with that?

Some investors manage money for others so they can earn enough to retire. Again, that’s fine, too. But just because they’re good at investing doesn’t mean they can invent anything. That’s a whole other class of people. I say do what you do best (that’s legal) and you’re contributing to society.

As far as the price of oil…there are many factors that determine its price, not just supplies. Look around the oil company you work for and see how many different divisions it has: exploration, development, marketing, etc. All these divisions have a role in the final price of oil.

William asks…

Investing in the stock market help?

I am 17 years old, I already have college payed for. Instead of wasting my money I’d like to invest it. What stocks should I invest in, I was thinking healthcare or possibly alternative energy companies. Ideas?

The Expert answers:

Start with some basic books to teach you the fundamentals. Two excellent reads are The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Investing and Investing for Dummies. You can probably find them in your local library. Before doing anything, make sure you have enough in savings in case things go south for at least 6 months.
You need to learn also some important concepts in investing, such as dollar-cost averaging and compound interest – two of your best friends to make money for the future.
Also you need to think of what you are investing for exactly. Different people have different goals. Is it for more income? For retirement? For tuition? Plus how long do you want to invest? How much risk are you willing to assume?
If you want to get into the market but don’t know what stock to pick, consider an index fund. Instead of throwing all your eggs into one basket (one company), index funds can invest you in dozens, hundreds, or thousands of companies all at once and so there is less risk. This protects you if any one company or industry runs into trouble. For bonds, the returns are much less, but more solid.
If you like Health Care, look into a Health Care mutual fund.
You first need to pick a company to invest through. Some of the best are Vanguard, T. Rowe Price, Fidelity, and Schwab. Avoid the big banks like the plague. Don’t let them rip you off with loads (sales charges) and fees. Check how much the company charges you as an expense ratio. A good one might charge you 0.2-0.8 %. If they charge more than 1% than go somewhere else. And if they charge any kind of 12b-1 fee, hold on to your wallet and RUN.
For more information, try looking at
https://personal.vanguard.com/us/funds/vanguard/all?sort=name&sortorder=asc
and play with it, comparing funds with more or less risk.

Do some reading online such as
http://www.vanguard.com/us/insights
for some important investment truths.

Steven asks…

Other than ethanol, did Bush propose anything specific on alternative fuels? Will oils drop & alternates rise

tomorrow? I only read the AP synopsis and it wasn’t clear what he was proposing, just jawboning against Middle East oil and something about ethanol in 6 years. I’m already using ethanol, so I don’t know what the hold-up is with that. Anyway, did anybody see any indication fuel cell or solar energy stocks will get a pop tomorrow, or any other winners or losers in the stock market?

The Expert answers:

No oil prices won’t drop and the oil companies will continue making huge profits. Bush has interests in oil companies thats why the prices began climbing, the day he came into office. Katrina was a legit excuse for raising prices so oil companies won’t let go of this excuse.

Sandra asks…

Why should a stock and or bond investor include alternative investments in their portfolio?

A. Real Estate Benefits
B. Energy Benefits
C. Gold Benefits
D. Other Commodities Benefots

The Expert answers:

Alt. Investments is another asset class. It’s relevant for purposes of diversification. Theoretically, it’s correlation differs from stocks/bonds and moves in an opposite direction (i.e. When stocks drop or go sideways, alt. Investments should not drop or go sideways also).

Commodities and Real Estate are arguably their own asset classes but often are alt. Investments.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Your Questions About Green Living

Ken asks…

Does California buy renewable energy from other states?

I’m doing a report and I would like to know if California buys Renewable energy from other states or, if they are totally self sustaining in that aspect. Maybe they buy solar energy from nevada or wind energy from Utah? Help?

The Expert answers:

I believe so. I think they may buy some hydroelectricity from British Columbia. But one report I just looked at says

At present, a number of states (including California) define “renewable” to exclude electricity
obtained from large dams. Under these provisions, BC’s “heritage assets” are not eligible at
present to count towards meeting the renewable portfolio standards of many jurisdictions.
California has a very aggressive set of targets for renewable electricity, requiring 20% renewable
by 2010 and 33% renewable by 2020. BC wind projects would qualify. Hydro projects would
seem to fit the bill, but to qualify in the California RPS market they must be less than 30
MW in size. Even more restrictive, the eligibility requirements prohibit the facility from
“adversely impacting the instream beneficial uses or causing a change in the volume or timing
of streamflow.”23 Thus, unless California changes the eligibility requirements within its RPS,
BC will be hard-pressed to market its hydro power, including potential new sources like Site
C, to that state.

Paul asks…

How are renewable and non-renewable energy sources diffrent?List two examples of each of these types of energy?

How are renewable and non-renewable energy sources diffrent?List two examples of each of these types of energy

The Expert answers:

I am glad you are interested in this question because it is important that we should reduce our reliance on non-renewable resources. Future generations will not thank us for wasting such resources.

Coal and oil are examples of non-renewable energy sources. They are fossil fuels obtained from the ground and were created millions of years ago during a phase in the earth’s development that is over. So as we use these resources less is available for the future. Furthermore burning fossil fuels creates pollution.
Solar panels and wind mills are examples of renewable resources because collecting such energy has little or no impact on its availability for the future.

But it may be worth pointing out that the term “renewable” is confusing. What we really mean is “sustainable”.

Best wishes for a more sustainable future.

Betty asks…

Will renewable energy be enough to live when we have used up all of the fossil fuels?

Will only renewable energy and no fossil fuels be enough to run the things that we label ‘essential’ for life?

The Expert answers:

Yes if we develop technology to use all sorts of renewable energy.

Steven asks…

Which presidential candidates are most likely to support the research and development of renewable energy?

It doesn’t matter if you list a Republican or Democrat… Just tell me what the candidate’s specific stand is on the development of renewable energy. If you have links to any articles that specifically address this, I’d appreciate that, as well. 🙂
Edit: Sorry about the thumbs down troll visiting my page. Don’t be afraid to answer my question for fear of getting a thumbs down on your answer, because I will be reading the content of your answers, while ignoring the ratings.

The Expert answers:

John Edwards policy:
http://www.johnedwards.com/issues/energy/

Hillary Clintons policy:
http://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/energy/

Barack Obama:
http://www.barackobama.com/issues/energy/

Nancy asks…

What kind of Engineer deals with coming up with new ways to use renewable energy?

When i say renewable energy i mean like solar power, wind power, hydroelectric power . Is there a certain type of engineer who works in these areas? Where is a good place to go to school for this type of Engineering.

The Expert answers:

Renewable energy is a specialized area of engineering. There is no engineering degree that focuses solely on renewable energy. The closest ones that I can think of are Chemical Engineering and Mechanical Engineering. The principles of chemical reactions are important in the study of energy. But to design and construct the harnessing devices requires knowledge of mechanical engineering.

Every engineer is taught the basics of every engineering discipline so even Computer Engineers can qualify if they specialize beyond their undergraduate education.

If you live in the Philippines, the best school to go to is of course the University of the Philippines. Among private universities, De La Salle University – Manila is best, followed by MAPUA. Ateneo De Manila’s engineering is handled by the Physics department as I have been told so I would be hesitant towards that school. The University of Sto. Tomas seems to have strong engineering background as well, but I have no certainty about that. In choosing the right school, accreditation of the engineering department and not just the school accreditation is important.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Your Questions About Green Living

Ken asks…

Eco Friendly home products?

I’ve been wanting to try out an ecofriendly,green laundry detergent and cleaners for my home.I usually use woolite or All as a detergent and Downy as a fabric softner.Palmoive for my dishes.And windex to clean. I wanted to try seventh generation but the detergent has no smell at all.I didn’t like the way it smelled.Can anybody suggest some ecofriendly products that are actually ecofriendly and that do work as well as “non-green” products?

The Expert answers:

Check out this blog for some helpful tips on how to green your home

http://blog.greensherpa.com/index.php/tips-and-tricks/green-your-home/

Michael asks…

Will people spend money on eco-friendly products? Even the price is a little bit higher than regular ones?

The Expert answers:

Environmentally friendly products are already doing very well on the market, even though they are already more expensive than the main stream product. “Eco-friendly” producers use less packaging or packaging that is also better for the environment which pushes the price.

Jenny asks…

Does Freds Dollar Store, Dollar General, or Family Dollar sell any eco friendly products?

The Expert answers:

I would think so, but have you asked yourself if this is just hype and do these products actually cause more loss.

Steven asks…

research help! eco-friendly products?

can anyone find anything about the cons of ecofriendly products and/or hybrid cars

or why they don’t save consumers money

The Expert answers:

No, of course not. Earth friendly products are good for everyone and everything involved. Go Green, Live Better 🙂

Robert asks…

research help! eco friendly products?

can anyone find anything about the cons of ecofriendly products or hybrid cars

or why they don’t save consumers money

The Expert answers:

Eco-friendly products don’t have to be more expensive but there is usually a trade-off. Recycling isn’t profitable so unless local government subsidizes it, most materials won’t get recycled unless it’s mandated, which is tantamount to theft.

There are a lot of promising ideas. The CAT or compressed air car may be launched in the US by the end of 2009, getting 100 mpg and having a top speed of 95 mph. For a car that seats 6 that’s pretty impressive and I’m not sure that it will cost more than other cars.

Solar and wind and other renewable sources take too long to pay back their initial cost right now but that may soon change as we move to solar thermal instead of solar photovoltaic to generate electricity. Currently, Ausra is building a plant in Nevada that they expect will produce electricity for 10cents a kwh which is competitive.

Some of the efforts are misguided, such as the switch to compact fluorescent lightbulbs which contain mercury. Once they’re disposed of, and you know many will just go to the landfills, that mercury will leach into the soil and may reach the water table causing serious problems. Why not wait for the LED light industry to mature and bring out house lighting? They consume very little power and aren’t hazardous.

The mandating of ethanol is one reason you’re paying more for food this year, since so much corn is being turned into fuel. It’s idiotic, they’d have to farm the entire North American continent to produce enough corn to make the fuel the US uses, which leaves no land for growing food. It’s a greedy and stupid idea which will cause a lot of harm before they repeal it.

Hybrid cars are an interim solution but they’re actually not that much more expensive than other cars. According to Kiplinger magazine the difference is sometimes only a thousand dollars or two, more for a Honda hybrid of course. You would be able to save that price difference over the life of the car at current gas prices.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Translate »