Your Questions About Green Living

James asks…

Are the “Simple” brand shoes made in the USA?

I know they are ecofriendly and all, but I would be really grateful if they were made in America. I can’t find anything on their website, but they are really expensive for being mostly recycled materials, so I was just wondering if they were made here. =]
Never mind. I looked at the label under the tongue of the shoe and it said “made in China” like ashley said. This just shattered my entire universe. =[

The Expert answers:

No they are not they are made in China.

Richard asks…

SWEATSHOP-FREE SHOES!?

I’m planning on getting some new shoes tomorrow. I’m probably just going to Kohl’s (parents’ decision).

What common brands are child labor and sweatshop free and possibly ecofriendly?

The Expert answers:

Pretty much everything is made in chinese sweatshops now a days unfortunately

Susan asks…

vegan toddler shoes in nz?

anywhere to buy vegan toddler shoes in NZ – I’d prefer an NZ manufacturer, all I can find online is eco friendly leather or uk/usa companies. Also I know warehouse etc sell some vegan shoes but I’m looking for a somewhat more ethical approach….

btw yes I do know that toddlers should go barefoot 99% of the time but there are always those situations esp in sunny dry chch where that is not always possible
thanks – was basing on one going out pair (mary janes ish) and 2 play pairs for the public park and playgroup etc where shoes are compulsory as they can get wet or trashed in the mud. I hadn’t considered 2nd hand for shoes – I’ll check out trade me

The Expert answers:

From my experience with my children, you can get by with one good pair at a time. Mine wore canvas shoes and plastic/rubber sandals and thongs (jandals), occasionally a second hand pair of full shoes from family or the op-shop. They really do out-grow shoes before they wear them out, so second hand is a good option which can fit in with vegan philosophy.

I’ve just done a quick search and limited it to Australian pages only, with these results http://www.google.com.au/search?q=vegan+toddler+shoes&hl=en&newwindow=1&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&biw=1252&bih=546&prmd=imvns&source=lnms&ei=TvXCTr-LG6-fmQWY9v2WCw&sa=X&oi=mode_link&ct=mode&cd=1&ved=0CDAQ_AUoAA#q=vegan+toddler+shoes&hl=en&newwindow=1&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&prmd=imvns&source=lnt&tbs=ctr:countryAU&cr=countryAU&sa=X&ei=UfXCTr2aO-aQiAfRlrn_DQ&ved=0CCsQpwUoAQ&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&fp=b3a1a4d7a24d3c64&biw=1252&bih=546 – some of them seem a bit pricey.

Whatever you do, don’t let yourself get sucked in to all the talk about toddler shoes, designed to play on parents’ worries about their kids’ feet. As long as your children are in bare feet (or socks with soft soles) whenever possible, their feet will grow as nature intended.

Joseph asks…

Looking for a great pair of VEGAN winter boots?

I live in Winnipeg, where it gets super-cold. I’ve tried Simple shoes, Mooshoes, and Vegan chic, with mixed results. The TOEst and PesTOE get mixed reviews, so I’m still looking. Any vegan/ecofriendly recommendations would be greatly appreciated.

The Expert answers:

These sites are awesome for vegan boots
enjoy XD

http://ragazzivegan.com/products.php?catID=0006.0005.0000.0000

http://www.alternativeoutfitters.com/clothing/vegan/womens-boots.aspx

Chris asks…

What is a catchy slogan for a Hover shoe?

i need a catchy slogan for a hover shoe. it is a high-top sneaker that can hover and move up to 10 mph. it can hover over mud, water, dog poo what ever u dont want to step in. easy way to get a student to class faster. it runs on solar energy as well. so its ecofriendly
any sort of slogan idea is great

The Expert answers:

The shoe that is good for the air and lighter than air. 🙂
[doesn’t pollute with bateries or exhaust and hoovers]

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Your Questions About Green Living

David asks…

What are some of China’s current environmental issues?

I need to find some to write about for a paper. I’d find them myself, but I’ve been doing homework literally all day and I just want to finish this paper and get some sleep. And, if you know any, it’d be nice if you could give me some future environmental issues, too.

The Expert answers:

They have too many people, they burn too much fossil fuel,

Richard asks…

What are environmental issues for the canadian sheild?

What are environmental issues of the canadian shield region of canada???? I need this for a geography I.S.U. Thanks in advance. 🙂

The Expert answers:

The lakes in the Canadian Shield are located where the rocks are igneous. This means that they will have little capacity to neutralize acid rain generated by coal fired power plants and some ore processing plants. The acid rain slowly increase the acidity of the lakes to levels that fish can not tolerate. In many other locations lakes are located in basins that have carbonate rocks that supply the chemical bicarbonate to the water. It is this chemical that has the capacity to neutralize acid rain and make these lakes much less susceptible to acid rain

Linda asks…

Environmental ISSUES?

Why does RESPONSIBILITY belong to corparate America and the leaders of a Capitalistic Society and their Disciples??

The Expert answers:

In the warped liberal mindset, it’s because “Corporate America” has “all the money.”

Conversely, liberals feel it’s their responsibility to tell you what to do with your (their) money. They are useless. Above all else, they desire power. They don’t give a damn about America or their constituents.

Charles asks…

What are environmental issues in Ontario?

Im doing a history project and I was wondering what are some/most of the environmental issues the affect Canada and Ontario directly?

The Expert answers:

Current issues- environment
air pollution and resulting acid rain severely affecting lakes and damaging forests; metal smelting, coal-burning utilities, and vehicle emissions impacting on agricultural and forest productivity; ocean waters becoming contaminated due to agricultural, industrial, mining, and forestry activities

this is for the country of canada

Susan asks…

How should we analyze environmental issues?

I would be good to hear from environmentalist or anyone who has been in an environmental controversy . Would like to hear how you would approach the analysis or what analysis techniques would you use to in environmental controversies.

For example analyzing and assessing scientific information put forwards by certain stakeholders within the issue.

The Expert answers:

I’m involved with property development. We always have to provide environmental studies regarding not only the immediate property, but also the extent to which the community-at-large may be impacted by the development.

The main body of the report is called an EIR (Environmental Impact Report). When it finds that the development will not adversely impact the property or community, this is referred to as “A Negative Declaration.”

Usually, we have to hire experts to analyze the specific environmental impacts, generally being:

Traffic
Seismic
Biological
Acoustical
Habitat
Archaeological
Soils

When a particular issue is discovered, the property is not usually rendered undevelopable. Usually, the owner of the property can deal with the issue using something called “Mitigation”, which is just a fancy way of saying that the environmental issue is allowed to exist within the development substantially unaffected.

When approvals are eventually given to move forward, it is only under certain “Conditions.” These are called “Conditions of Approval.”

One typical Condition is that, upon discovery of any archeological remains while digging, the development process will be suspended while a team of environmental experts is dispatched to study the findings.

As you can see, here in California environmental issues reign supreme.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Your Questions About Green Living

Lisa asks…

What do you think about Sarah Palin’s energy ‘expertise’?

A lot of conservatives are trying to portray Sarah Palin as some sort of energy expert. Here are some Palin quotes.

She thinks it’s God’s will that a natural gas pipeline be built through Alaska.

“I think God’s will has to be done in unifying people and companies to get that gas line built, so pray for that,”

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/02/palins-church-may-have-sh_n_123205.html

She seems to share McCain’s disdain for renewable energy.

alternativeenergy solutions are far from imminent and would require more than 10 years to develop.”

http://www.charleston.net/news/2008/aug/16/alaska_gov_wants_tap_oil_resources51051/

She thinks oil can solve our energy problems.

“I beg to disagree with any candidate who would say we can’t drill our way out of our problem”

http://www.omgili.com/newsgroups/talk/environment/C49F02AA10FDCleonard78spprimusca.html

Do you think the portrayal of Sarah Palin as an energy expert is justified?

http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/03/note-to-media-pork-queen-palin-is-earmark-expert-not-energy-expert/
regarding renewables being unproven, how about PG&E signing contracts for up to 900 MW of solar thermal:
http://www.pge.com/about/news/mediarelations/newsreleases/q2_2008/080401.shtml

800 MW of solar photovoltaic:
http://www.pge.com/about/news/mediarelations/newsreleases/q3_2008/080814.shtml

Not to mention all the wind energy already in use, particularly in Texas, just as a few examples to the contrary.

Plus Pickens believes that we can get 20% of our energy from wind power alone in 10 years, and the Bush Department of Energy believes 20% in 20 years (and that’s just wind!)

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/windandhydro/pdfs/41869.pdf
http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/12/must-read-bush-doe-says-wind-can-be-20-of-us-power-by-2030-with-no-breakthroughs/
gcnp – no, but I just read a plot summary. Interesting parallels indeed.

The Expert answers:

Not at all. We cannot keep relying on non renewable sources of energy to power our country. While I agree that natural gas is a better alternative than oil it is still not the answer, we only hold approx 3% of the total natural gas reserves in the world so it seems to reason that we should explore other avenues. I believe that she says what she says about Alaska because she is theGovernorr of that state and the primary roll of a governor is (arguably) to build up the economy of their given state. She has no background in science or domestic energy policy on a nation wide scale; she just knows that it will bring more money to her state. And the fact that she brings God into the equation is very insulting. Idon’tt recall God saying anything about supporting a capitalist society that helps make the rich richer and the poor poorer.Statisticallyy and historically speaking economies that rely on the extraction of natural resources are very fragile and don’t do very good jobs of sharing the wealth (ex. People that work in the oil/gas industry in Alaska make a lot of money but peopel working in unrelated fields do not). I dont think the portrayal of her as being an energy expert is, by any strech of the imagination, accurate. Her (as well as McCain) view on energy policy is to make more and drive prices down. I think these people have forgotten that oil/nat gas are both finite resources; the price of each increases as supply decreases (each will run out one day and prices will increse until that point is reached). We as americans must now demand the use and development of cleaner and more renewable sources of energy (it should have began years ago). The bottom line is this; people who have no real experience but call themselves experts usually have no idea what the hell they are talkin about. It is time for a change in our domestic energy policy, and the only person that will likely deliver this is Obama and Biden (I say this even though I have historically voted republican, but not this time)

Michael asks…

has President Bush gone completely energy nuts?

here President Bush goes again — pandering to the alternative energy crowd. [see story at link] has he gone completely off the deep end?

http://money.cnn.com/2008/03/05/news/bush_ethanol/index.htm

or only partly off it?

***
my hypothesis:

America needs to drill in ANWR, drill offshore, mine that clean cloal in Utah [world’s largest deposits are just sitting there], AND build at least 15 nuclear reactors per decade.

Meanwhile President Bush makes nice noises at the alternative energy conference and acknowledges that ethanol is driving up food prices — BUT he doesn’t say beans about reversing the present policy that is hitting us all at the grocery store. NOR has he any quantifiable program.

Is he as bad as the Socialist Duo? [Sen. Pied Piper and Sen. Shrew].
comment for D Rocker: hydrogen makes a fine fuel for cars IF you can produce it at home. That’s fairly easily done by electrolysis of ordinary water. This allows you to move the energy production location to the power plant, which can burn uranium or coal or oil/gas.

While this visionary technology doesn’t yet exist, the fuel cells and electrolysis units to make it possible aren’t that far away — certainly less than 10 years if oil prices continue to soar.

but it can’t be done if America isn’t willing to produce significantly larger quantities of energy here at home … and that’ll take all available types of power plants, not just the greeen dreams of the eco-friendly.

The Expert answers:

Just as the president, D Rocker has also been drinking the ethanol Koolaid.

Just recently it was reported that the production of ethanol fuels (corn, sugar cane, ect) increases the greenhouse gas build up faster then crude oil does. As the price of these products increases, the farmland to grow them also becomes more valuable. This will then cause farmers to clear non-farm land for the growing of these products. These products are much less efficient at removing CO2. Combine this with the fact that ethanol fuels create more pollution to produce then crude oil, any argument about their benefit is ignorant.

As for ANWR. Between Alaska and Canada, we have enough oil for who knows how long. They have predicted that these reserves could produce larger quantities of oil then the middle east. We are stupid not to drill it. Every other country that has oil is drilling it. We unfortunately have people like D Rocker who have their heads to far up their green *sses to see the truth regarding global warming and oil production. Worse yet is that the nuetered republican party feels that need to side with these morons.

As for food. The simple increase in food prices could have DRASTIC effects on our economy. D Rocker seems to think that this is just fine. Well fine, then he can pay the difference in my grociery bill because he is not educated enough to understand how the fuel industry works.

This has me sooooooooooooooooooooooo p*ssed off!!!!

GO CRUDE!!!

Mark asks…

environmental issues in the news?

I need to find a current article/news in one of these categories
~alternative energies
(wind solar hydroelectric, etc.)
~living green
(examples of communities, people, etc. that are lessening impacts on the environment)
~human impacts
population impacts, pollutions, comsumption, etc.
~conservation efforts

The Expert answers:

In the “Human Impacts” category, you would be able to find information on how the contamination of groundwater has effected the health of certain communities. See the Erin Brokovich case and reference other similar events.

Steven asks…

Why are the Chinese so aggressively pursuing Alternative ENERGY such as wind and solar power?

Moving away from dependence on oil is a major priority for the Chinese.

Are they doing this because they are a bunch of Tree Hugging Hippies or do they understand what the United States does not, that we have a dwindling supply oil oil?

Don’t the Chinese believe Fox News when they assure us that we have hundreds of years worth of oil left?

The Expert answers:

They aren’t moving away from oil. They are just gearing up to sell the crap to us.

Do you think they don’t read the news and see that 0bama is forcing this down our throats?

The US is the biggest market in the world and China knows how to take advantage of it.

Sandra asks…

What do you think an Energy Catalyzer (Ecat) would mean to the climate issue?

I was just reading some interesting stuff on alternative energy sources. I came across a concept call Ecat which appears to be a spin off of cold fusion which is more accurately called “low level nuclear reaction”. http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2011-10/06/e-cat-cold-fusion?page=all

It’s hard to tell just how credible any of this is. But it does put the possibility of a CO2 emission free source of energy on the market which would likely start as heating devices and possibly fuel-free cars before be adapted to mass energy sources.

What are your thoughts on this? (Other than I’ll wait and see. Please feel free to assume this is true and speculate on what it might mean).

The Expert answers:

For those that had a quick look but couldn’t find anything about how it works…. This is the closest I got.

“The E-Cat is a device in which hydrogen gas, powdered nickel metal, and an undisclosed catalyst are combined to produce a large amount of heat through a little understood low energy nuclear reaction (LENR) process inside a specially designed chamber. The inner workings of the reactor are covered by a trade secret which Rossi consistently refuses to discuss.

In this process, when an external heat source is applied (Electric or fossil) it is claimed that the nucleus of a hydrogen atom, a proton, penetrates a nickel nucleus and in doing so a nickel atom becomes a copper atom, and releases a large amount of thermal energy.”

Can he really change nickel to copper at room temperature? A great trick if if works… No nuclear waste, no hazzardous materials, no extreme temperatures or pressures, no exotic infrastructure, can be done at small and large scale etc etc.

It all sounds a bit too good to be true.

Edit:
We don’t have to wait long to find out…
“Andrea Rossi has announced that the first commercial E-Cat plant will be a 1 MW thermal power plant which is scheduled to be launched in an unannounced location on October 28th, 2011 with worldwide commercial rollout of the technology to follow in November”

I also found this…
“Its a typical cold fusion scam. They are just running 3% hydrogen peroxide solution like you have at home through the plumbing. The nickel catalyst causes it to break down into oxygen, which no one notices, water, and lots and lots of heat.

Ask them the drink the water that goes in it”

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Your Questions About Green Living

Susan asks…

what percentage of the worlds energy supply comes from renewable resources? 1-19-52 or 85?

biology

The Expert answers:

Biology?!?!

Your in the Earth Science & Geology section

Sharon asks…

Renewable Energy and Global Warming? Are Solar and wind helping?

Where I am coming from:: GW / Climate change is undeniable and Man Made.

I’m looking for thoughts from people who are knowledgeable in areas like Physics, Meteorology and Earth Sciences or generally know how the Earth and Nature work.

Solar and Wind energy seem to be the only two renewable sources that take energy directly out of the air. What makes me wonder is that I think they may be benefiting the environment more than we realize.

In addition to being clean energy sources they may be removing a lot more energy out of the environment then we realize, as they have been put in by the world on a massive scale. I tend to think wind turbines and solar panels probably dissipate nearly 100% of the energy that hits them. If the CO2 and pollution that we pump in the air is somewhat the same amount of energy as what we take out, we might have already found a way to compensate?

What do you think?

By the way renewable energy output has gotten to be almost even with nuclear energy output at 9%, much to the chagrin of the energy monopolies.
Ok Qaiser lets try to make this simpler, and Greg but the thing is if we can still convert it to energy then the energy existed. Energy is energy and if we’re saying there’s extra energy in the atmosphere I think getting rid of it or using it is a little less energy in the environment, nomatter if its at ground level or not.

We say our problem is that the CO2 mixed with the pollution we pump into the atmosphere heats up the atmosphere.

Ok that energy is already in the atmosphere. Now since solar and wind take whatever forms of energy they are and convert them into energy we use.

Now energy is energy. The physics law of conservation of energy has to apply here. In other words you dissipate some at the ground level and you’ve dissipated the total energy in the atmosphere, at the time, by that amount.

You can actually see it with wind turbines in water where fog develops because you actually cooled the surrounding air. You’ve also created a down draft that could be bringing some CO2 d
I meant to say the downdrafts created by turbines might bring CO2 down to ground level where it can be absorbed by plants trees or oceans.

P.S. You jokesters are real funny.

There’re solutions for bird and bat problems. Change the color of turbines, for instance.

No renewable energies can be developed by any company and any country thats what you’re all afraid of losing your monopolies, but forget it there future is written. Good luck getting nuclear plants running again, they take to much collaboration, effort and money to bring. Plus we haven’t built any of them in 30 years. Where do ya think we’ll get the nuclear experts?

Mtrstude, thanks but one thing you’re saying it ultimately gets released back but thats true for everything, ultimately it will go back but what if the next time it does its CO2 free which is our ultimate goal. Maybe we can continue with our reduction in energy usage so it won’t go back so quickly.

Pindar, well they must be helping somewhere cause we’re putting them up everywhere and we’ve stabilized our CO2 output in the last 3 years and Global CO2 output was down 1.3% in 2008 could be that it was due to the global recession. But still there’s more amunition to fight the folks that say GW is not due to humans.

But I can’t believe CO2 is all at ground level. Even if it is heavy the wind can still fling it around like it was nothing. That goes agains everything including NASA which has the atmospheric CO2 at 331 PPM. http://climate.nasa.gov/
You know whats really strange is that the people that are right are getting the thumbs downs and the people that haven’t a clue are getting the thumbs ups? Whats up with that? Well then to all the people getting the thumbs down, I commend you! You struck a cord with the denialists, great job!
Pindar I’m not talking about the UK if thats what you’re talking about. Where did you get that figure?
Here’s the EIA’s figure. Winds contribution in the U.S. may be small but its not 0, more like around 0.8% in the U.S.
http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/alternate/page/renew_energy_consump/rea_prereport.html
The only brainwashing being done is by the money flows. Pindar I don’t join anybody for the purposes of joining them. If I happen to be on the same stance as them its because they and I both see the obvious.

Show me the evidence, but thats the problem isn’t it! The GW / Climate change denialists have no evidence to show and no way to disprove the facts and true observations.
Lalu are you talking about the 9% figure Lalu? Why don’t you check the graph on the EIA link I posted. That has renewables at 8% vs 9% for nuclear and that was for 2009.
“Worldwide wind energy production at the end of 2009 was 340 TWh, which is about 2% of worldwide electricity usage.”
http://energy-statistics.blogspot.com/2010/09/global-wind-energy-statistics.html

The Expert answers:

The short answer is ‘no’, they aren’t taking energy out of the air in the long run because whilst wind absorbs energy that was already in the atmosphere it is then used up as electricity, which is ultimately given out as heat and returned to the atmosphere. The net effect is zero.

Renewable energies emit less CO2, even once you include building and maintaining them. This slows global warming.

In terms of absorbing heat, it’s a bit more complicated than that. Power stations burn fuel and cause a bit of global warming that way: usually 2-3 units of heat for each unit of electricity (including the electricity which eventually heats the atmosphere).

The effect of solar panels depends on where you put them and their efficiency. If they are 10% efficient and you put them on shiny 90% reflective ice, then they actually mean you absorb 9 units of heat for every unit of electricity you make and they increase global warming – the ratio is 3 times worse than a fossil fuel or nuclear power station. But on the plus side, the carbon savings are a much, much bigger effect.

If you put a solar panel on a dark asphalt surface and you don’t change the reflectivity of the surface, then you’re getting power for ‘free’ in heat terms – you’re not absorbing any more and your ratio is 1 unit of electricity for 0 units of extra heating…

(I did a physics masters in solar cells and I’m now doing a PhD in climate science – I did the maths already for a solar power system’s effect on global warming, e-mail me if you want it)

George Orwell is spreading his ignorance once again. Atmospheric temperatures here:
http://www.skepticalscience.com/Did-global-warming-stop-in-1998-1995-2002-2007-2010.html
Of course, the atmosphere isn’t the only part of the globe. Trillions of tons of ice have melted since 2000 and sea levels have continued to rise as more heat goes into the oceans. In George Orwell’s world, more energy in the climate system isn’t global warming though.

Mary asks…

Is Denmark disproving the myth that a carbon cap and renewable energy investment is bad for the economy?

According to Forbes magazine, the “best country for business in the world” — for two years running — is uber-green Denmark
http://www.forbes.com/2009/03/18/best-countries-for-business-bizcountries09-business-washington-best-countries.html

Denmark has one of the strongest cap-and-trade commitments in the world — 20% below 1990 levels by 2008-2012. And it has a requirement that 20 percent of its overall energy mix be renewable by the end of 2011. And its efficiency measures are such that Energy Minister Connie Hedegaard said last year, “In 2025, (Denmark’s) total energy consumption will not have risen in 50 years.”
http://climateprogress.org/2009/04/16/forbes-global-warming-denmark/

And apparently it’s the best country for business in the world. Does this shatter the myth that a carbon cap and renewable energy investment is bad for the economy?

The Expert answers:

It would appear to at least be an example of a country where carbon cap/renewable energy is not a barrier, however the foundations for this were laid by Denmark society many years ago. Denmark has a culture where cooperative social responsibilty is very highly valued, this has helped them make and take tough decisions which are then generally accepted by all classes and all political parties.

One reason that illustrates how this came to be is the example, of the growth in membership of the Nature Preservation Organization (DN). In 1975, the organisation had some 50,000 members. From 1978, the organisation intensified the recruitment of new members via telephone calls to all Danish households. At the same time, it shifted attention from nature preservation to environmental problems in general. This strategy proved extremely successful. By 1980, membership had doubled, and by 1983, the threshold of 200,000 members was passed. By 1988, the organization had 280,000 members. This not only made DN the largest nature preservation organisation in Europe; it also meant that it had more members than all Danish political parties put together.

This is an incredible lobbying force and one that put influence on decisions that were way ahead of any other country at this time and shaped the way Denmark did business, run its institutions and educated its population.

The results are that infrastructure and the general business, social frameworks are pro environmental investment of all types it is now part of their DNA and Connie Hedegaards statement is not political hot air, it is a confident and highly realistic prediction.

Daniel asks…

How about a crash govt program to develop fusion energy ala the Manhattan project? Elim dep on fossil fuels?

Fusion energy is an almost endlessly renewable energy source that is non polluting and produces no radioactive byproducts like nuclear. The oceans of the world have a virtually endles supply of fuel (duterium). Progress has been slow but with unlimited govt backing maybe a breakthrough could be made.

The Expert answers:

Funding is not the major problem for developing fusion reactors. There is simply a lack of knowledge, especially when it comes to understanding the mechanisms of the plasmas in such a way that they can be controlled in a fusion reactor. Theres also plenty of rather contradictory engineering problems one must get by such as containing a reactor as hot as the core of a sun within a room inside a metal caseing that would be vaporized upon contact with the core. We have a good idea on how to do that but then you gotta look at how exactly do you turn this amazingly hot plasma into steam? Well you have to think up solutions for that. We have some solutions but they sure aren’t great. Other fuel sources are wonderfully simple in their creation of energy…. Compared to fusion.

I suppose you could accelerate it by maybe forcing people into physics, ha! Unfortunately, our culture glorifies people who can get their faces on TV and complain about problems instead of the people in the labs working to fix the problem. It’s a personal pet peeve of mine to see so many shy away from actually contributing to the solution in meaningful ways.

James asks…

Renewable energy, All UK Pub toilets, distilled pee, to recover all Uk alchohol for recycling or petrol?

And all world alchohol too. Alchohol is not absorbed by the body, all of it comes out in the pee, thats why you get dehydration and hangovers, apparently. So why not connect all the towns pub pee toilets up and distill it to recoup the alchohol, put it back into the drinks, to save all that energy brewing/distilling it in the first place! or just process it to run as alchohol petrol replacement in vehicle engines. Or football grounds and hotels, and events provide their own heating. etc. If anyone patents this idea, we’ll go 1/3rds, ie you, yahoo, and me.

The Expert answers:

Definitely badly informed.
Alcohol is very much converted in the body – it contains a lot of calories and hence you get the famous beer belly if you overdo consumption. The energy you propose to waste in collecting and “recovering” what little alcohol does pass through would be better spent elsewhere.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Your Questions About Green Living

Sharon asks…

How is WTO (World trade organization) related to sustainable development and why is it important?

The Expert answers:

It is not in general.

“The World Trade Organization (WTO) is an international body whose purpose is to promote free trade by persuading countries to abolish import tariffs and other barriers. As such, it has become closely associated with globalisation.”
“The WTO is the only international agency overseeing the rules of international trade. It polices free trade agreements, settles trade disputes between governments and organises trade negotiations.”

The World Bank though is more interested in sustainable development.

I hope you find the two links below of use.

Nancy asks…

Has anyone seen the new sustainable development city outlined in the newest issue of Scientific American?

They have one in San Fran, one in Shanghai and one in Abu Dhabi. What did you think of all of them?

The Expert answers:

Very nice

Betty asks…

What are the dimensions of sustainable development?

The Expert answers:

•Population
•Natural resources
•Livable habitat (and livestock)
•Communications
•War/Peace
•Pollution

Chris asks…

What are the recent books on the issue of sustainable development?

strategic planning, experience from cities around the globe.

The Expert answers:

1.Leading Change Toward Sustainability: A Change-Management Guide for Business, Government and Civil Society by Bob Doppelt
2.The Sustainability Revolution: Portrait Of A Paradigm Shift
by Andres R. Edwards, David W. Orr
3.The Nature of Sustainable Development
by Sharon Beder
4.The Practice of Sustainable Development (Paperback)
by Douglas R. Porter (Author), Rutherford H. Platt (Author), Urban Land Institute (Corporate Author)
5.Sustainability: A Philosophy of Adaptive Ecosystem Management by Bryan Norton
While many disciplines contribute to environmental conservation, there is little successful integration of science and social values. Arguing that the central problem in conservation is a lack of effective communication, Bryan Norton shows in Sustainability how current linguistic resources discourage any shared, multidisciplinary public deliberation over environmental goals and policy. In response, Norton develops a new, interdisciplinary approach to defining sustainability—the cornerstone of environmental policy—using philosophical and linguistic analyses to create a nonideological vocabulary that can accommodate scientific and evaluative environmental discourse. Emphasizing cooperation and adaptation through social learning, Norton provides a practical framework that encourages an experimental approach to language clarification and problem formulation, as well as an interdisciplinary approach to creating solutions. By moving beyond the scientific arena to acknowledge the importance of public discourse, Sustainability offers an entirely novel approach to environmentalism.
6. Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change by Susanne Moser and Lisa Dilling
The need for effective communication, public outreach, and education to increase support for policy, collective action and behavior change is ever present, and is perhaps most pressing in the context of anthropogenic climate change. This book is the first to take a comprehensive look at communication and social change specifically targeted to climate change. It is a unique collection of ideas examining the challenges associated with communicating climate change in order to facilitate societal response. It offers well-founded, practical suggestions on how to communicate climate change and how to approach related social change more effectively. The contributors of this book come from a diverse range of backgrounds, from government and academia to non-governmental and civic sectors of society. The two editors are Susanne Moser and Lisa Dilling. The book is accessibly written, and any specialized terminology is explained. It will be of great interest to academic researchers and professionals in climate change, environmental policy, science communication, psychology, sociology, and geography.
7. Harvard Business Review on Green Business Strategy (Harvard Business Review Paperback Series) (Harvard Business Review Paperback Series) by Hbsp (Paperback – Nov 1, 2007)
8. State of the World 2007: Our Urban Future (State of the World) by Worldwatch Institute (Paperback – Jan 15, 2007)
9. Megatrends 2010: The Rise of Conscious Capitalism by Patricia Aburdene (Paperback – May 2007)
10. Vital Signs 2007-2008: The Trends that Are Shaping Our Future (Vital Signs) by The Worldwatch Institute (Paperback – Sep 13, 2007)
11.The Business Guide to Sustainability: Practical Strategies and Tools for Organizations by Darcy Hitchcock and Marsha Willard (Paperback – Aug 2006)
visit amazon. Com and target.com to get more books.

David asks…

For an underdeveloped country, what should the biggest priority be in providing sustainable development?

Interested in opinions. Perhaps infrastructure? This is assuming the country would be granted a couple billions of dollars.

The Expert answers:

I’m thinking electricity. You can do so much more when you jump on the grid. Nuclear Pebblebed Technology looks promising! 😀

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Your Questions About Green Living

Susan asks…

What do you think the best eco-friendly car is?

Doesn’t have to be just based on mpg or co2 emissions, but also price, practicality and performance as well.

Please state why as well, thanks

The Expert answers:

Based on MPG and co2 EMISSIONS and performance, well, your answer is the tesla roadster.

No emissions, runs on electricity. Range of 400km (250 miles) on a single charge. 0-60 in 3.7 seconds!!!

But not practical because its $100 000. Only for the rich…

but you can convert your own gasoline car into an all electric car for atleast $5000. Depending on how good you want it to be. A really good conversion would be above $10 000. Still cheaper than a brand new car, and it will beat most gas cars on the street in acceleration. Electric motors have superior torque, so they will out accelerate almost anything. Unless if you put in a small motor, with heavy lead acid batteries. Lots of people do that because they’re on a tight budget, so they get the low end stuff…
Lots of people are converting gasoline cars into electric cars in their own garages everyday!!! I plan on doing one, and i want it to go FAST!!! So i gotta get a job cause i’ll need some money…

Also, check out this electric car, its a car someone converted in their garage. Its nickname is the white zombie. It does quarter mile in 11 point something seconds. It beats all these corvettes, and muscle cars, its awesome! Check it out!

Http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BrHXdM9f13k

btw, even if electric cars get their electricity from coal, they’re still better than gasoline. Think about this, a gas car puts EIGHT TONNES of CO2 into the air IN ONE YEAR!!! An electric car uses less electricity than a clothes drier.

Thomas asks…

What are ‘plug-in hybrids’? Are these cars always eco-friendly?

Another barrier, Mr. Smith said, lies in the batteries for so-called plug-in hybrids, which require more powerful batteries that charge more quickly than the current generation of hybrid batteries.

The Expert answers:

The thing is, it takes a certain amount of energy to move the car, whether conventional gas or diesel combustion or hybrid gas-electric or plain electric. That energy has to come from somewhere. So, a combustion engine is bad for the environment, but then so are power plants which generate the power to charge the batteries. People just don’t seem to get this idea about where the energy comes from and are the ones crowing about how eco-friendly a hybrid is, but it really ISN’T al that good when you consider the root source where the energy used to move the car comes from.

Betty asks…

What are the best ‘small cars’ which are eco friendly and don’t consume too much petrol?

im getting a new car.

The Expert answers:

Small by north american standards or Small by Euro standards?

Chris asks…

What’s the most eco-friendly car in the UK?

My rustbucket’s just been scrapped and I while i love my bike and my feet and my rollerblades, i would like to replace the deceased automobile for trips to the diy store and surfing beaches.

i have under 3k to spend and want to get the most ecofriendly second hand car available (from 2001 onwards).

I’ve seen loads of websites rating 2005/2006 models but I can’t afford them and would rather have a second-hander. Where can i find information about ecofriendly models from the past five years?

i don’t mind which fuel (diesel, petrol or vegetable oil).

Thanks!

The Expert answers:

–VW Jetta(diesel)
–Toyota Corolla
–Honda Civic
Any of this cars should be in Ur price range,and are Eco friendly

Steven asks…

Are cars eco-friendly…?

Today around 500 million cars travel the streets of the world… Cars need fuel, rubber, metal, plastic and synthetic fibres…
What is environmentally wrong today?…

The Expert answers:

Cars, as opposed to motor vehicles, were a brilliant invention of the 20th century designed for the sole purposes of labeling and cocooning their owners. There is no such thing as an eco-friendly car – its a contradiction in terms.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Your Questions About Green Living

James asks…

Does Yahoo know about Synthetic trees? Global Warming?

Apparently, some scientist guy has come with a way to fight global warming. For Real. A scientist has invented an artificial tree designed to do the job of plants.

But the synthetic tree proposed by Dr Klaus Lackner proposes does not much resemble the leafy variety.

“It looks like a goal post with Venetian blinds,” said the Columbia University physicist, referring to his sketch at the annual AAAS meeting in Denver, Colorado.

But the synthetic tree would do the job of a real tree, he said. It would draw carbon dioxide out of the air, as plants do during photosynthesis, but retain the carbon and not release oxygen.

If done to scale, according to Dr Lackner, synthetic trees could help clean up an atmosphere grown heavy with carbon dioxide, the most abundant gas produced by humans and implicated in climate warming.

He predicts that one synthetic tree could remove 90,000 tonnes of CO2 in a year – the emissions equivalent of 15,000 cars.

“You can be a thousand times better than a living tree,” he said.

Carbon sinks

For now, the synthetic tree is still a paper idea. But Dr Lackner is serious about developing a working model. His efforts suggest the wide net of ideas cast by scientists as they face the challenge of mitigating climate change.

Dr Lackner believes that carbon sequestration technology must be part of the long-term solution. Global reliance on fossil fuels will not decrease any time soon, he said, and developing countries cannot be expected to wait until alternatives are available.

The technology calls for two things – seizing carbon and then storing it. Direct capture of CO2, from power plants for example, is the simplest, according to Dr Lackner. But this doesn’t work for all polluters. A car can’t capture and store its carbon dioxide on-board; the storage tank would be too large.

“It’s simply a question of weight,” he said, “for every 14 grams of gasoline you use, you are going to have 44 grams of CO2.”

The alternative is to capture emissions from the wind. In this case, a synthetic tree would act like a filter. An absorbent coating, such as limewater, on its slats or “leaves” would seize carbon dioxide and retain the carbon.

Dr Lackner predicts that the biggest expense would be in recycling the absorber material.

“We have to keep the absorbent surfaces refreshed because they will very rapidly fill up with carbon dioxide,” he said. If an alkaline solution such as limewater were used, the resulting coat of limestone would need to be removed.

Dr Lackner is considering other less-alkaline solutions to prevent carbonate precipitation.

“There are a number of engineering issues which need to be worked out,” he said.

Home use

A synthetic tree could be planted anywhere. A small one could sit like a TV on the lawn to balance out the CO2 emitted by one person or family.

But more practically, said Dr Lackner, a device the size of a barn would sit in the open air, near repositories for easy transportation and storage of carbon.

He estimated that 250,000 synthetic trees worldwide would be needed to soak up the 22 billion tons of CO2 produced annually.

But not everyone is rooted to the idea. Massachusetts Institute of Technology engineer Howard Herzog thinks Dr Lackner’s design won’t hold together on the scale he proposes.

He said you would expend more energy in capturing the CO2 – in keeping the slats coated in absorbent and disposing of it – than you’d save.

“Once the solvent captures the CO2, it holds it on tight,” said Dr Herzog, “and it’s going to take a lot of energy to break those bonds.”

He said that much more research is needed on the technology.

“The idea of air capture is seductive and would really be great to have,” said Dr Herzog, “but it’s important to separate out the concept from the technical details.”

‘Early days’

Meanwhile, Dr Lackner is pursuing his idea for carbon storage. While he was at the US Department of Energy‘s Los Alamos National Laboratory, his team worked on a storage method based on a natural chemical process known as rock weathering.

When CO2 binds with magnesium, it creates carbonate rocks which, according to Dr Lackner, retain carbon permanently and safely.

Currently, he said, the process is still too expensive to develop on a large scale.

But Dr Lackner is optimistic that the costs for carbon capture and storage will come down.

“This is still the early days of climate solutions,” he said.

The Expert answers:

Just to add – the report is a bit out of date. Since it was written the scheme has been trialed on a small scale and the chemistry has evolved. There is also a similar proposal by Dr David Keith

The current proposal for Prof Lackner’s method is to use sodium hydroxide, this reacts with the CO2 in the air. The NaOH can be recovered for reuse and the byproduct used as synthetic fuel.

There’s more about the chemical processes and the two schemes in a previous answer I provided to a similar question – http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AmcxWxraYWy4WH2VFGCA0h0jzKIX;_ylv=3?qid=20070822201803AAFxofS

Betty asks…

When will we have the resolve to build more Nuclear Power Plants; which emit NO CO2 into the Environment?

“The nuclear option should be retained precisely because it is an important carbon-free source of power.”

“Taking nuclear power off the table as a viable alternative will prevent the global community from achieving long-term gains in the control of carbon dioxide emissions.”

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and Harvard University

As of 204, France produced 78% of its energy needs from Nuclear Power, while at the same time the United States produces only 20%, while generating 57% of its Electricity from Coal that accounts for 90% of CO2 emissions.

http://nuclearinfo.net/Nuclearpower
http://www.policyalmanac.org/environment/archive/nuclear_energy.shtml
http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epm/epm_sum.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_in_France
WOW … amazing! Realst1 calls me a Right Wing (extremist) while the next person, BossH, calls me a Socialist!
BossH: Lead-Cooled Fast Reactor (LFR) is a Generation IV Reactor for both electricity and hydrogen production.

Toshiba has applied for a license to build a 4S Sodium-cooled Fast Reactor (Generation IV) in the United States.

http://nuclear.inl.gov/gen4/lfr.shtml

The Expert answers:

Funny how you people don’t want to become a socialist nation but keep whining about how a government that exerts a huge amount of control over energy businesseses is doing what you want done.

The reason why France is doing it so heavily is because their government forces the change.

In America we allow corporations to make the change when it is economically feasible for them to do so.
Waiting until Genertaion IV nuclear power plants are finished being tested, before building new technology that will produce power and hydrogen fuel from the energy lost fromt he system, is more economically feasible for corporations. If you notice we are working closely with the French to develop and implement the technology.

Http://gif.inel.gov/roadmap/pdfs/gen_iv_roadmap.pdf

As soon as the Generation IV nuclear power plants are ready, the nuclear power companies will start spending 40 bilion each plant to build them, instead of spending it to build obsolete technology that does not produce hydrogen fuel.

Nancy asks…

it is true that fish oil can help against manic depression?

http://www.oism.info/it/farmaci/alternative_naturali/olio_di_pesce_contro_depressione_maniacale.htm

The fish oil can help against manic depression.
Effectiveness of Omega 3 oils in dealing with manic depression, schizophrenia, depression, hyperactivity, the LDCs, etc..

Dr. Ann Blake Tracy: In September 1998 the National Institute of Health conducted a seminar on the effectiveness of Omega 3 oils in dealing with manic depression, schizophrenia, depression, hyperactivity, the LDCs, etc.. Now a new study supports those reports. Although the study was addressed only to oil fish, linseed oil is not recommended because it exposes a potential toxicity-toxicity due to polluted waters where the pesci.________________________________________
Scientists believe they have found a surprising new ally in their efforts to understand and treat acute sudden changes of mood of manic-depression fatty acids of fish. A clinical experiment at Harvard University on 44 patients suffering from manic depression, or bipolar, have had positive results with fish oil the experiment was stopped after 4 months and all patients were put into care with 14 capsules daily.
The fish oil is rich in fatty acids omegs-3, a family of polyunsaturated fatty long chain that have been associated with reduced cardiovascular disease and other health benefits. The highest concentrations of omega-3 fatty acids are in the eye and brain, where neurobiologi believe are essential for the proper functioning of cell membranes. If the levels of omega-3 fatty acids are too low, have assumed, then the streets are essential chemical sopraffatte may arise and mental disorders.
The study conducted at Harvard was the first significant scientific gaze on the effects of fish and its fatty acids on manic-depression that is estimated to affect between 1 and 2 percent of Americans at some point in life. The disorder produces surges from the levels of energy and mood abnormemente senior maniacalità of acute depression, and is generally treated with drugs other than those prescribed for unipolar depression, the most common form of depression. (It has been estimated that 20 percent of Americans suffer from some form of depression throughout life).
But some researchers believe that omega-3 fatty acids play an equally important role in unipolar depression. Joseph Hibbeln of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, has discovered an amazing correlation between the consumption of fish and depression. The society in which people eat much fish, he discovered, have markedly lower levels of depression compared with the society in which people did not eat much fish. Does his work “suggestive” rather than conclusive.
Stoll said that it unbeaten in fish as a possible cure for manic depression when he reviewed the literature on compounds from the effects similar to traditional drugs such as lithium and Valproato. “Wherever the guardammo were the omega-3,” he said. “We had heard of the omega-3 to medical school, but there was given much attention since then.” While fish oil has long been used as a dietary supplement safe, doctors warn that may oxidize if not is stored properly.

The Expert answers:

The thing with these claims is that they work differently for different anatomies…

Fish oil, which is rich in Omega-3 and a very essential fat for the brain MAY benefit some people (people for instance who actually can ‘synthesize’ this digested material into their body). Others who despereatly need certain substances (like with anatomical or chemical malfunctions), may not be able to synthesize these molecules into their system. Untill thorough studies can proove this, you can try it out and see for yourself if it does work for you or not. But be cautious: just because something works for many many people (or not) doesn’t mean that it will (or won’t) work for you as well. Some people have allergies, others don’t. There is some simplification, but no generalization when it comes to biology/medicine etc.

Ken asks…

HELP ME TO HELP YOU…….WANT TO DO Something FOR MANKIND….?

hey guys i have some great ideas …..some innovative ideas too….i have some rare ideas in mind which would help my country as well as our beloved earth….like alternative source for producing electricity…a car that runs on a very less amount of energy(without fossil fuel)…..new system for railways that would reduce accidents as well as explosions….and some innovations for fun like a bike with pulleys which can do stunts safely….and more ideas….i have read abt many ideas which are printed in newspapers…..but i dont think they are of that worth…..i think my ideas are more useful and scientific…..
but the problem is that i am not able to explore my talents to the general people or the world…plz guide me or suggest me some platform through which i can show my potential.. like if there is any institute or some media…give me contact info…who knows may be my ideas will change the world……plz help me to help you…

The Expert answers:

Please dont loose heart

this is a site with some positive news
http://goodnewsindia.com/index.php/gni

please refer the following sites which may be very helpful to you. But this is only the first step and a lots and lots of hurdles are yet to come in ur journey any way best of luck.

The national innovation foundation: http://www.nif.org.in/
http://www.sristi.org/cms/
http://www.gian.org/
http://knownetgrin.honeybee.org/honeybee.htm

to submit your innovations
http://knownetgrin.honeybee.org/knownet_share.htm

to submit your ideas visit
http://knownetgrin.honeybee.org/idea_bank.htm

http://www.indiainnovates.com/inventors_of_india.htm

Start a blog then.

Maria asks…

Help Me TO HELP YOU….WANT TO DO SOMETHING FOR MANKIND….?

hey guys i have some great ideas …..some innovative ideas too….i have some rare ideas in mind which would help my country as well as our beloved earth….like alternative source for producing electricity…a car that runs on a very less amount of energy(without fossil fuel)…..new system for railways that would reduce accidents as well as explosions….and some innovations for fun like a bike with pulleys which can do stunts safely….and more ideas….i have read abt many ideas which are printed in newspapers…..but i dont think they are of that worth…..i think my ideas are more useful and scientific…..
but the problem is that i am not able to explore my talents to the general people or the world…plz guide me or suggest me some platform through which i can show my potential.. like if there is any institute or some media…give me contact info…OR some website or email id…who knows may be my ideas will change the world……plz help me to help you…

The Expert answers:

Ok, first off we’re not going toward global warming.

Why?

Tripoli Libya (why Libya because its one of the countries that hasn’t change much during past 10 years other cities have grown considerably so the temperature from those cities would be higher for sure).

1999 Average Temperature 21.4
2007/08 Average Temperature 20.3

Difference of 1.1 Deg C, i.e. We’re not going toward global warming we just came out of Solar Maximum, now we’re in solar minimum.

If you look at past trends we’re on the peak of High temperature, temperature will just fall from here on, next solar maximum will be 2015 after this there would be 27 years gap between next solar maximum i.e. Lots of cold weather.

Wanna do something good for Earth then try to find more green house gases because if the world goes 2-3 Deg C warmer its not a problem, yes sea level will rise by 23cm and yes we’ll have hot summer.

But overall average rain will increase, increase in crops, frankly I don’t care about certain tree growing somewhere, not my problem, I do care if the world goes into mini ice age, which will mean end of many life as food production will go down, decrease in rainfall, many countries in africa will have huge problems with famine.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Your Questions About Green Living

Susan asks…

What is the best online source for renewable energy news?

I am looking for an educational online website for reliable renewable energy news and industry information.. I’d appreciate it, thanks!

The Expert answers:

I have a good one for you, try http://www.renewable-energy-news.info/ for information along those lines. They seem to be getting into biofuel, tidal power, and other “emerging” green energy technologies.

Robert asks…

What is a non-renewable energy resource used today that is not a fossil fuel?

Science Class Question: I had to choose four non-renewable energy resources used today, and pick one that wasnt a fossil fuel. I choose oil/petroleum, natural gad, coal and uranium

The Expert answers:

Uranium is not fossil fuel and is used in nuclear power plants to produce electricity. Fossil fuels are fuels formed by natural resources such as anaerobic decomposition of buried dead organisms while silvery-white metallic chemical element.

Chris asks…

McCain claims to support Renewable energy. When are we going to hear the details?

So far he has always been opposed to renewable energy support of any kind.

The Expert answers:

He talks details everyday in his town hall meetings; but the media rarely reports it. However, now that Palin is campaigning with him that will most likely change.

I’m personally looking forward to the debates between all the candidates.

Sandra asks…

Explain your views on the use of renewable energy when compared to using coal oil or gas?

Hi,
Explain your views on the use of renewable energy when compared to using coal oil or gas.
thank you!

The Expert answers:

Renewable energy can supply a significant proportion of the United States’ energy needs, creating many public benefits for the nation and for states and regions, including environmental improvement, increased fuel diversity and national security, and regional economic development benefits.

It provides environmental benefits such as cleaning air pollution. It can also be a good sources of sulfur dioxide, carbon dioxide and nitrogen oxides.

Ken asks…

How would be possible to mitigate the climate change effects through using renewable energy resources?

How would be possible to mitigate the climate change effects through using renewable energy resources focusing on bio electricity, geothermal energy and hydropower?

The Expert answers:

Using such energy sources doesn’t actually mitigate the effects of climate change. However they do not contribute to climate change either, because they produce less Carbondioxide than conventional energy sources.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Your Questions About Green Living

Mark asks…

What are 3 rules to live by that will make human activities on the planet sustainable?

what are some rules for individuals and the world which will help the planet be more sustainable?

The Expert answers:

Isn’t it reduce, reuse, and recycle?

Richard asks…

What is the best, sustainable and recyclable material that i can make a bike saddle out of?

For my engineering diploma i need to find a suitable material to make a bike saddle out of. The material MUST be sustainable and recyclable. Please Help!
For my engineering diploma case study I need to find a suitable material to make a bike saddle out of. The material MUST be sustainable and recyclable. Can you please be specific with the materials. (eg. the bike frame will be made of aluminium 7005 alloy) Please Help!

The Expert answers:

The answer to your question is leather.

If constructed correctly and taken care of it will last for as long as you will.

If it lasts that long, you (personally) won’t need to recycle it. If you use an animal that is bred for food the source of materials is sustainable in the fact that the animal has not been killed for the leather.

The frame for the leather saddle will probably be greenest if constructed of steel. It can then be recycled. Avoid any synthetic materials.

If you want to be really green a wooden saddle will work. It can be burnt for keeping warm if it fails.

Maria asks…

What can you do with a degree in green and sustainable enterprise?

My major is Business Management, but I think Business Management is too broad. Can someone please explain to me what are my career options if I change my degree to GREEN AND SUSTAINABLE ENTERPRISE? Thank You Kindly

The Expert answers:

You will basically be called a white-collar tree-hugger! 😉

Jokes apart, the world needs people who are entirely and genuinely focused on ways of doing/promoting businesses and business models that are environmentally sustainable and renewable.

I believe this field will bring about the next generation Bill Gates and Steve Jobs; if not in terms of money, then at least in terms of impact!

George asks…

What’s the biggest issue of sustainable tourism in united states?

What aspect can be improved in sustainable tourism development in u.s?What’s the obstacle for the sustainable tourism and ecotourism development in u.s?

The Expert answers:

It might be frowned upon to visit the USA if you’re from a country who has a united hatred for the USA. Other than that the USA has many hot spots for tourism – it is more of an international effort to showcase what the USA has to offer tourists from other countries. For internal tourism efforts states can ramp up what they have to offer visitors and showcase their best locations via multi-effort advertising campaigns.

Robert asks…

What kind of science and technology do you think is needed for realizing a more prosperous & sustainable world?

by prosperous i mean happiness ( including wealth but not only limited to wealth)

by sustainable i am talking in enviornment terms and development which can be sustained for future generations also.

The Expert answers:

Geo-thermal energy

we have masses of energy under our feet, far more than all our nukes put together

its already been done, we just need to do a whole lot more

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Your Questions About Green Living

Joseph asks…

please do this assignment please 10 points?

Write a detailed travel plan of your visit to the country researched in Part 1.

this is part 1,

Latin America includes the Spanish and Portuguese-speaking nations of the Americas and the Caribbean. Visit your course library and locate a map of North America and South America. On the continent of North America, Mexico and its neighbors to the south are part of the region known as Latin America, as well as all countries on the continent of South America. Select one country in Latin America that is of interest to you. Click on the Briefing Data link below and print out the list of categories and explanations. Using various resources available in your course library or elsewhere, gather facts about the country for each of the categories listed. View the following presentation called MLA Style Documentation to learn how to properly cite your sources. Text only version. You may also want to try this Latin America resource link. Create a separate table or report to present the data for the country.

and this is the briefing data,

Select one country in the assigned world region for this briefing. Look at the list of categories below. Select 20 categories–10 from List A and 10 from List B. Using various resources available in your course library or elsewhere, gather facts about the country for each of the 20 categories you select. You will find the CIA World Factbook particularly useful.

Detailed information about what data to look for is provided in the category explanations that follow. Organize the information you find and create a table for the country to present the data. Or, you may prefer to present the data in the form of a report. The data you provide in the table will help you complete Part 2 of this assignment.

Category List A Category List B
1. Official Name of Country 14. Population
2. Popular Name of Country 15 Language
3. Capital City 16. Religion
4. Administrative Divisions 17. Life Expectancy
5. Other Major Cities 18. Literacy
6. Area 19. Gross National Product
7. Boundaries 20. Per Capita GNP
8. Landforms 21. Industry
9. Bodies of Water 22. Agriculture
10. Climate 23. Exports
11. Natural Resources 24. Imports
12. Land Use 25. Balance of Trade
13. Environmental Issues/Natural Hazards 26. Currency/Exchange Rate

Category Explanations
List A
Official Name of Country List the official name of each country in this briefing. The official name is often called the “conventional long form.”

Popular Name of Country A shorter version of a country’s conventional long form name is often its more popular name. Include the popular name for each country in this briefing.

Capital City Provide the name of the city that is the official seat of government for each country in this briefing. Usage Note: The term used for the city that serves as a seat of government is spelled capital. The term used for the building in which a legislative assembly meets is spelled capitol.

Administrative Divisions Countries are often divided into smaller units called states, provinces, or territories. There may be many such units, as in the 50 states of the United States of America, or there may only be a few such divisions. Provide the number of administrative divisions for each country in this briefing.

Other Major Cities Major cities are large population centers where important economic and social activities take place. Provide the names of three such cities for each country in this briefing.

Area Many of the statistics used in the study of geography have to do with the different areas of the earth’s surface. The area of a country is the extent of the surface enclosed by its boundaries. There are several ways to measure area.

In the U.S. system, area is measured in square miles. A square mile is equal to a square in which each side is one mile long. A smaller area of land may be measured in acres. An acre is 43,560 square feet, or equal to a square in which each side is 208.7 feet long. There are 640 acres in one square mile.

The metric system is another way of measuring area. An area that is one square kilometer is smaller than a square mile because a kilometer is shorter than a mile. A smaller area of land may be measured in hectares. A hectare is equal to a square of land in which each side is 100 meters long. The following is a chart to help you convert measurements of area in the two systems:

To Convert: Multiply By:
Sq. miles to sq. kilometers 2.59
Sq. kilometers to sq. miles 0.3861
Hectares to acres 2.47
Acres to hectares 0.405

The sizes of countries vary considerably. Some countries are huge, such as Russia with a total of 6,592,735 square miles. Other countries are very small. Monaco, for example, is less than one square mile in area.

It is also important to consider that a country’s area will probably include both land and water areas. Provide the figures that represent the land, wat

The Expert answers:

Woah, 10 whole points? And all I have to do is your homework? What a deal! And all I got for doing my own homework was a diploma, a college degree, and a job! Man, did I get screwed!

Nancy asks…

please do this assignment please it meens alot to me?

Please do this assignment please 10 points?
Write a detailed travel plan of your visit to the country researched in Part 1.

this is part 1,

Latin America includes the Spanish and Portuguese-speaking nations of the Americas and the Caribbean. Visit your course library and locate a map of North America and South America. On the continent of North America, Mexico and its neighbors to the south are part of the region known as Latin America, as well as all countries on the continent of South America. Select one country in Latin America that is of interest to you. Click on the Briefing Data link below and print out the list of categories and explanations. Using various resources available in your course library or elsewhere, gather facts about the country for each of the categories listed. View the following presentation called MLA Style Documentation to learn how to properly cite your sources. Text only version. You may also want to try this Latin America resource link. Create a separate table or report to present the data for the country.

and this is the briefing data,

Select one country in the assigned world region for this briefing. Look at the list of categories below. Select 20 categories–10 from List A and 10 from List B. Using various resources available in your course library or elsewhere, gather facts about the country for each of the 20 categories you select. You will find the CIA World Factbook particularly useful.

Detailed information about what data to look for is provided in the category explanations that follow. Organize the information you find and create a table for the country to present the data. Or, you may prefer to present the data in the form of a report. The data you provide in the table will help you complete Part 2 of this assignment.

Category List A Category List B
1. Official Name of Country 14. Population
2. Popular Name of Country 15 Language
3. Capital City 16. Religion
4. Administrative Divisions 17. Life Expectancy
5. Other Major Cities 18. Literacy
6. Area 19. Gross National Product
7. Boundaries 20. Per Capita GNP
8. Landforms 21. Industry
9. Bodies of Water 22. Agriculture
10. Climate 23. Exports
11. Natural Resources 24. Imports
12. Land Use 25. Balance of Trade
13. Environmental Issues/Natural Hazards 26. Currency/Exchange Rate

Category Explanations
List A
Official Name of Country List the official name of each country in this briefing. The official name is often called the “conventional long form.”

Popular Name of Country A shorter version of a country’s conventional long form name is often its more popular name. Include the popular name for each country in this briefing.

Capital City Provide the name of the city that is the official seat of government for each country in this briefing. Usage Note: The term used for the city that serves as a seat of government is spelled capital. The term used for the building in which a legislative assembly meets is spelled capitol.

Administrative Divisions Countries are often divided into smaller units called states, provinces, or territories. There may be many such units, as in the 50 states of the United States of America, or there may only be a few such divisions. Provide the number of administrative divisions for each country in this briefing.

Other Major Cities Major cities are large population centers where important economic and social activities take place. Provide the names of three such cities for each country in this briefing.

Area Many of the statistics used in the study of geography have to do with the different areas of the earth’s surface. The area of a country is the extent of the surface enclosed by its boundaries. There are several ways to measure area.

In the U.S. system, area is measured in square miles. A square mile is equal to a square in which each side is one mile long. A smaller area of land may be measured in acres. An acre is 43,560 square feet, or equal to a square in which each side is 208.7 feet long. There are 640 acres in one square mile.

The metric system is another way of measuring area. An area that is one square kilometer is smaller than a square mile because a kilometer is shorter than a mile. A smaller area of land may be measured in hectares. A hectare is equal to a square of land in which each side is 100 meters long. The following is a chart to help you convert measurements of area in the two systems:

To Convert: Multiply By:
Sq. miles to sq. kilometers 2.59
Sq. kilometers to sq. miles 0.3861
Hectares to acres 2.47
Acres to hectares 0.405

The sizes of countries vary considerably. Some countries are huge, such as Russia with a total of 6,592,735 square miles. Other countries are very small. Monaco, for example, is less than one square mile in area.

It is also important to consider that a country’s area will probably include both land and water areas. Provide the figures that represent

The Expert answers:

What is wrong with your thinking?

It’s not helping you to do your homework.
If somebody does it for you; YOU are not learning a thing.
If somebody does this for you; you are going to have to do the ones on a test later.
So, what have you done? You would have cheated.

Take the time to figure out how to do it for yourself. Once you do; you will feel so good about yourself.

Your teacher is there to teach you how to do this. She doesn’t know who needs help unless they (YOU) tell her.
PLEASE GET THE HELP!!

Ps: I didn’t read a bit of what you wrote for your assignment.

Donna asks…

Does James Cameron know …?

that the extortionists who rammed the North American Free Trade Agreement down our collective throats blackmailed canada into agreeing that the united states of america holds proprietary rights over canada’s natural petroleum resources, and that the agreement further states that neither the government nor the people of canada have the right to any of those resources until the energy demands of the united states of america are met?

That was a question.

As an apparent individual concerned with native and environmental issues, is Jim aware that if you’re going to publicly fish slap people or entities in the face and accuse them of wrong-doing with the Athabaska Tarsands, it also appears either ignorant or deliberately disingenuous not to fish slap who is truly responsible instead of a politically convenient and unresponsible scapegoat?

Is he also aware that such actions tend to make it appear to critical thinking people that Jim might be somebody’s spokesman talking out of both sides of his chops at once?

These are all questions to consider, don’t you think?

Isn’t that another question?

Didn’t you just love Avatar?

The Expert answers:

He probably does. He’s well educated.

Laura asks…

English homework correction please?

Please kindly correct my answers? I’ll quote some parts of main text that are required to answer.
“Did pollution finish off the Roman Empire? The Romans stored wine in lead vats and some scholars think lead poisoning weakened their minds and lay behind the fall of their civilization.”
When did pollution begin to be a problem?
A:”It began to be a problem since the Roman Empire.”

In 1306 Edward I banned the burning of sea-coal because it made ‘so powerful and unbearable stench’.”
What made Edward I ban the burning of sea-coal?
A:”It was the powerful and unbearable stench that made Edward I ban the burning of sea-coal.”

“At the bottom flows, or rather stagnates, the Irk, a narrow, coal-black, foul smelling stream. ‘Across the Pennines in Leeds, you could only see the sun on Sundays.
Why would the sun be seen in Leeds only on Sunday?
A:Because people usually stop working in factories and industries on Sunday.

“American cities like Pittsburgh, so dark that drivers sometimes had to use their headlights at midday, began to impose smoke controls in the 1930s and ’40s.
How did American cities try to solve the particular problem of pollution in the ’30s and ’40s?
A:American cities imposed smoke controls in the 1930s and 1940s to solve the particular problem.

“London followed suit after the Great Smog of 1952…. Londoners now enjoy 70% more sunshine in December than they did in 1958.
To what extent did Londoners succeed in solving the smoke problems?
A:Londoners did succeed goodly in solving the smoke problems, because they now enjoy 70% sunshine in December than they did in 1958.

In the ’70s America and Japan moved to control vehicle fumes by fitting special converters to car exhausts.”
To what extent did Londoners succeed in solving the smoke problems?
A:Special measures were taken in America and Japan by fitting special converters to car exhausts to control vehicle fumes.

“By the end of the ’60s the environment was in fashion – The New York Times carried over 1,600 articles on environmental issues in 1970, eight times as many as it had in 1960.”

A:In what way did “The New York Times” show a growing interest in the environment?
A:The New York Times showed a growing interest in the environment by publishing more than 1,600 articles in 1970, eight times as many as it had in 1960.

In 1972, 113 countries met at a UN conference in Stockholm tp discuss these problems – a landmark itself. But in the 1980s most of them still remain unsolved.
Do you think that pollution problems were solved by the conference in Stockholm? Justify.
A:No. Most of pollution problems remain unsolved in Stockholm, even in the 1980s.

The Expert answers:

Answers you posted are in agreement with the “facts” you posted, but ar the “facts” you posted really “true facts” or just “made up facts”

Sandy asks…

Democrat or Republican? – First time voter in 2012?

I will be 18 then, I was wondering what political party is best for me?

Abortion – I think it should be legal, but controlled more.
Euthanasia – I think it should be legal, but controlled, people should get counseling before they do it.
Immigration – I think legal immigration should be capped at a certain number and I think all illegals should be deported.
Gun Rights – I think the idea of gun control is good, but in a country like America where so many people already have guns its undoable so I think it should be left alone.
Environmental Issues – I think we should try and cut emissions and put pressure on countries like Brazil to protect the Rainforest
Health Care – I don’t support it, its not my fault some people can’t be bothered to work.
Gay Marriage – I’m against that, no offense to gay people but its not right in my opinion.
Iraq and Afghanistan – I think we should leave.

I’m excited about being able to vote 🙂

The Expert answers:

Based on you classification of each and how you view them.
Abortion: This could mostly be centrist or moderate liberal thinking. Both abortion and euthanasia cheapen the value of life. Once the door is opened, there will be no closing it. Because we have already accepted as a society that he ending of a life not yet born, the next step is to determine who is of value on the other end of life. That has already been mentioned by some within the power structure at this time. Who will determine when it is your time to pass? Conservatives shun both concepts.
Immigration: There already laws on the books to allow qualified immigrants to come within quotas. Hoover, Truman and Eisenhower all ordered the deportation of illegals to secure jobs for citizens. This is a conservative value, but unaddressed by both parties.
Gun Rights: Limited gun control is expected, but many laws on the books are too restrictive. It will not stop the drug smuggler from also bringing in weapons. We all know how the war on drugs has gone down. Very limited gun control is a conservative issue.
Environmental: We need to be careful about polluting our environment, but some common sense needs to be inserted into the knee jerk reaction of Liberals. How far is too much to allow industry to survive? Limiting regulation to reasonable standards it a conservative issue.
Health Care: Again limits to government interference into the private sector must be maintained at a minimal of interference. Health care can be fixed without trashing the entire system and letting inefficient government bureaucrats waste more taxpayer money. Conservative issue.
Gay marriage: Civil unions are available in most states to insure that all legal claims are protected. That is enough for most of them, it is only the activists that are really pushing it. Civil union is conservative.
Iraq and Afghanistan: Iraq is mostly to our advantage because of it’s close proximity to Iran. A presence there is strategic to possible problems with Iran. Afghanistan is still a breeding ground for terrorists because of the nearly impenetrable terrain. As long as radical Islam wants us dead, we must keep after them so they will not regain as much strength. Conservative issue. Good Luck

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Translate »