Your Questions About Green Living

Donald asks…

Would you buy COOL LOOKING Furniture made from Clay?

(it’s eco friendly)

Please also see:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=As5CgCJZPu_XIaiW18ndZKfsy6IX?qid=20060725144853AACQ4YO

for any details / Q’s
By the way:

If they were made with pillows and stuff (like wooden furniture is) YES they would be just as comfy!

=)

The Expert answers:

Absolutly! I think thats an awesome idea! You could match any color needed to for decorating, and it would be just as durable as alot of furniture already out there. It probably wouldn’t be any more time comsuming to produce than wooden furniture, and I’m pretty sure it would be cheaper. Good Idea and Good Luck!

Helen asks…

I need your advice on baby cribs. Can you help?

I am a furniture designer and I am interested in creating a nursery line. Do you Moms/Dads have any suggestions on how to make my cribs more convenient for you? I love modern furniture, so definitely this
line will be modern as well. I am also planing to make it ecofriendly, and convertible (crib-daybed). What would you like to see in the future cribs? Any problems with you current cribs, suggestions? THANK
YOU!

The Expert answers:

I know a lot of parents don’t feel that the sliding rails on cribs are really safe, so what if instead of the rail sliding down the top piece (like a foot or two) kind of folded down and then locked into place. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a crib that did that so it might be a rather unique feature.

Sandy asks…

How should i decorate this?

Well, i have a pretty small room and i’m thinking of painting it… The colour that comes to mind is white, since i have a small room i hope the white will allow it too seem larger. But the problem is i dont know what colour furniture should i add? Also, any wall decoration..
I’m a pretty relaxed person, i love the nature, really eco friendly
So, any ideas? 🙂
thanks for any help 🙂 !

The Expert answers:

I would paint the walls a neutral tan color. White can get really boring, and tan goes with everything so you can always change the decorations later.

I’ve had small rooms and one thing I did was I put my bed horizontally against my wall and added pillows and made it look like a couch. It looked cooler and opened up the floor giving the illusion of a bigger room.

As far as color of furniture, just pick a color you love!

I love decoration rooms and I would be happy to help you further! Feel free to email!!

Lizzie asks…

Room remodeling?

I am a teen remodeling my room! I have recently gotten new windows, so it’s a lot brighter in my room, with 2 windows instead of 1. The room was repainted to a slightly deep purple, and all of my furniture is being painted white. What decor should I buy or look at for a unique, laid-back, feel and look for my room?….similar to Starbucks’ style. Maybe some organic or ecofriendly items…which is even cooler! Any suggestions for wall additions, or bedding either? Also, my carpet is white, if that matters. Thanks! 🙂

The Expert answers:

I would suggest some lovely bright yellows and deep blues to make the purple really zing. Go to IKEA.com and check out their lighting and pillows and duvet covers. IKEA is very well priced and affordable while being good quality and imaginative. Your room sounds lovely, enjoy!

Nancy asks…

Redecorating my bedroom – Hippie bohemian style… Help?

Right now my bedroom is red and black and modern. My style has completely changed, and now I’m looking to redecorate my room. Please let me know if you have any ideas and if you know where to get bohemian/hippie furniture (include website links, please). I’m also into the environment, so ecofriendly items are a plus. Thanks so much! 😀

The Expert answers:

Http://teensthemes.com/tie-dye-hippie-theme-bedrooms.html
http://store.delias.com/browse.do;jsessionid=EE1FCBE9ACC0C9A8FA3A46BEC2F35C06.worker6?categoryID=2147&sidenavTrack=roomwares.peace
http://www.pbteen.com/shop/girls-bedding/girls-organic-bedding/?cm_type=lnav

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Your Questions About Green Living

James asks…

cars and environmental issues?

Cars and environmental issues?
Hi, could someone provide me some examples of how cars causes some of the environmental issues we see today? I’ve been searching, but most of them talk about co2 and global warming. Others about pollution and health issues, but neither specific nor detailed. If it’s possible provide me some links so i can look into it further,

thanks,

The Expert answers:

The main emission from modern cars is carbon dioxide. This is the gas that Al Gwhore blames for global warming. If he would actually READ those science books of his, he’d see that plants breath in carbon dioxide and release oxygen. Maybe he should tear down his $9,000,000 mansion and plant a few trees.

William asks…

‘Big business will revolve alot around environmental issues in future [20 years]’ (working lunch today)

does this herald a golden age in which geographers will at last be taken seriously!?

The Expert answers:

Or maybe they just want a piece of the pie…you know?

Ruth asks…

What kind of careers in governement focus on environmental issues and improving the global environment?

Are these jobs in demand? Do you get to travel around the world?
Is it good pay and job security because in today‘s economy those are definely important things to consider?

The Expert answers:

Forest ranger

Sandra asks…

What environmental issue do you think is the most important facing the US today?

And why?

The Expert answers:

We need to take the politics out of environmental issues and look at the science. Look at the hype about “global warming”. If your research comes up with any answer other than the “approved” global warming exists answer your funding is cut and you are run out of every university.

The underreported scandal about the famous “hockey stick” graph is an example. The scientific model of future temperatures gives the same results regardless of the variables entered. Its like a calculator that gives the answer ”
4″ no matter what numbers you put in.

The rush to do anything leads us to do terrible things. We replace gasoline with ethanol, even though it provides less power per gallon, produces more CO2 than gas, and leads us to produce massive amounts of corn (a soil depleter) rather than responsible crop rotation.

We replace incandesent bulbs with CFLs, even though the amount of mercury vapor in them can be toxic if it breaks (the EPA has a 9-step process for cleanup if you break one, including throwing out any cloth materials).

We have to put the science back into this subject and not use it as a way to push a liberal agenda.

Chris asks…

how are motorsports justified given our current economic and environmental issues?

I’ve never really found motor sports interesting, but as I’m flipping through TV stations today I have to ask. There’s no way that these top fuel dragsters, or tractor pull vehicles ( and all the other vehicles) are in line with emissions standards. With that in mind and the price for fuel and oil, how can these so called sports be justified?

The Expert answers:

“how can these so called sports be justified?”

Most automobile innovations came from the racetrack.

For example:

Pneumatic tires.
Pneumatic shocks.
Suspension technology.
Alternate fuel technology.
Fire prevention.
Passenger restraint.
Radial tire design.
Aerodynamic design.
Fuel injection.
Ignition technology.
Lubrication technology.
Tool development and technology.

And lots more.

More fuel is consumed by the spectators driving to the event than is consumed by the race-cars.

About the same amount of fuel is used putting on an NFL game. Are those games “justified”?

This “so called” sport renders competition that demands excellence. As a result, the cars we drive are safe and reliable and efficient. I bet the guy who works on your car is a race fan. HE finds it interesting even if you don’t. The reason he finds it interesting is because the skill of auto mechanics is risen to a high art from which we all benefit.

There are competition races involving solar, electric, as well as other alternate fuels. Is this “justified”? Will this spark innovation?

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Your Questions About Green Living

William asks…

Which countries are leaders in alternative energy source research and utilization?

Why are these countries so interested in alternative energy?

The Expert answers:

Yaay we are! (sings; rule britannia, brittania rules the waves!)

we have a working tidal stream turbine
http://www.marineturbines.com/

working wave generator farms;
http://www.pelamiswave.com/

two off shore wave power research facilities for new prototypes, one in devon and one in scotland.

Come on usa! Do keep up!

Actually, in terms of per capita generation, the danes, closely followed by the swedes.

Edit;
tde, i’m not sure you can count nuclear as ‘alternative’ lol!

Richard asks…

what percentage of a country’s budget is dedicated to developing alternative energy sources?

could you say that use of alternative energy sources is not widespread because the country only allots little money for it?

why?

what are other problems?
uhh, any country? the US, perhaps?

The Expert answers:

Yes. Because the companies which supply us with energy have a lot of us employed. This makes for a difficult process. Plus there are myriads of companies which are in the chain to supply energy. It is hard to shift that many people instantly. It is being done slowly now. When the alternate ideas are spread more,more people who are in the current energy supply companies change over and they make money. There will be a snowball effect and everyone will jump in. I seen this take place in our economy beginning in 1959. I started working at a company that made lawnmower ,snow blower gas engines. When I started we built 800 engines a day ,10 years later later we were building 12,000 engines a day. To run almost anything power. The engine started in the machine shop where it was machined to specs,in 60 minutes it had gas in the engine running in the test bed. In 1 hour it was packed and in the truck. Now most of this is made in China,etc We now produce the major supply of solar panels in the world and ship 80 % out to the world.We need more engineers, Smart people who refuse to give up producing alternate energy ! We must Sell more to other countries. We can do it when we have the right people ready!

Sharon asks…

Metal hydrides as alternative energy source?

I have an oral presentation to do on Metal hydrides as an alternative energy source. I tried to do some research on metal hydrides and all I come up with are published scientific research papers and people selling cells of metal hydrides.

I don’t want you to do my homework for me; I want to do it myself. But, could someone give me like an introduction or overview of Why/how is metal hydrides an energy source?

Thanks and 10 points for best answer!

The Expert answers:

From what little I know, they’re a powerful type of battery. Pretty much any chemical reaction that can be done in a sealed container can be used as a battery. It’s a matter of how much energy can be made in a small amount of space.

Sandy asks…

what are problems associated with alternative energy sources such as solar power and nuclear?

im doing a project for school and it asks what are the problems associated with alternative energy sources.
now, i know fossil fuels(coal, oil etc…) create greenhouse gasses but solar power, it seems there is nothing wrong with it
is there anything wrong with it?

The Expert answers:

Hurdles in using solar power:
1. It’s affected by time(day/night), climatic conditions and geographic location.
2. Initial Investments are high.
3. All technological developments are made by keeping the conventional energy sources in mind. Thus, solar energy cannot be integrated easily with these technologies involving additional cost.

Cons of nuclear energy:
1. Disposal of radioactive waste material is not easy.
2. Working with radioactive substance is hazardous and can cause genetic mutations in humans if they come in contact with such a substance.
3. Controlled reactors are required for generating energy so that the fission chain reaction does not go out of proportion.
4. Radioactive material is rare and available only in a few places of the world.

Betty asks…

I just want to know what is Obama planning to do with alternative energy if he wins the Presidency?

Obviously, we can’t rely on fossil fuels anymore.

*Please no links. If you’re a die-hard Obama supporter, then please provide me with a one or two sentence summary of his alternative energy plan.
Thanx Danny Boy.

The Expert answers:

This is what he proposes, from his website:

“Require 25 Percent of Renewable Electricity by 2025: Obama will establish a 25 percent federal Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) to require that 25 percent of electricity consumed in the U.S. Is derived from clean, sustainable energy sources, like solar, wind and geothermal by 2025.

Clean Technologies Deployment Venture Capital Fund: Obama will create a Clean Technologies Venture Capital Fund to fill a critical gap in U.S. Technology development. Obama will invest $10 billion per year into this fund for five years. The fund will partner with existing investment funds and our National Laboratories to ensure that promising technologies move beyond the lab and are commercialized in the U.S

Deploy Cellulosic Ethanol: Obama will invest federal resources, including tax incentives, cash prizes and government contracts into developing the most promising technologies with the goal of getting the first two billion gallons of cellulosic ethanol into the system by 2013.

Double Energy Research and Development Funding: Obama will double science and research funding for clean energy projects including those that make use of our biomass, solar and wind resources.

Convert our Manufacturing Centers into Clean Technology Leaders: Obama will establish a federal investment program to help manufacturing centers modernize and Americans learn the new skills they need to produce green products.

Increase Renewable Fuel Standard: Obama will require 36 billion gallons of renewable fuels to be included in the fuel supply by 2022 and will increase that to at least 60 billion gallons of advanced biofuels like cellulosic ethanol by 2030.

Establish a Grant Program for Early Adopters: Obama will create a competitive grant program to award those states and localities that take the first steps to implement new building codes that prioritize energy efficiency.

Reduce Carbon Emissions 80 Percent by 2050
Cap and Trade: Obama supports implementation of a market-based cap-and-trade system to reduce carbon emissions by the amount scientists say is necessary: 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Obama’s cap-and-trade system will require all pollution credits to be auctioned. A 100 percent auction ensures that all polluters pay for every ton of emissions they release, rather than giving these emission rights away to coal and oil companies. Some of the revenue generated by auctioning allowances will be used to support the development of clean energy, to invest in energy efficiency improvements, and to address transition costs, including helping American workers affected by this economic transition.

Expand Locally-Owned Biofuel Refineries: Less than 10 percent of new ethanol production today is from farmer-owned refineries. New ethanol refineries help jumpstart rural economies. Obama will create a number of incentives for local communities to invest in their biofuels refineries.

Renewable Fuels: Obama has worked on numerous efforts in the Senate to increase access to and use of renewable fuels. Obama passed legislation with Senator Jim Talent (R-MO) to give gas stations a tax credit for installing E85 ethanol refueling pumps. The tax credit covers 30 percent of the costs of switching one or more traditional petroleum pumps to E85, which is an 85 percent ethanol/15 percent gasoline blend. Obama also sponsored an amendment that became law providing $40 million for commercialization of a combined flexible fuel vehicle/hybrid car within five years.”

Planning and proposing is one thing, but to actually do it is another. Let’s hope Obama can actually implement and execute what he wants to do if, and only if, he becomes President.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Your Questions About Green Living

Sandra asks…

Is a renewable energy tech. a person who would fix the windmills and such?

I am looking to go into renewable energy, I want to be the person who goes out and fix the windmills and such, what is the name of that career path?

The Expert answers:

Its called a Wind Tech. It is supposed to be a fast growing occupation with good compensation like a $75,000 a year salary and a company truck.

Laura asks…

How much renewable energy does Australia use?

I need to find a graph or date showing how much renewable energy the states of Australia uses, for example Darwin – 38%

Please help, been looking for ages

The Expert answers:

Hi Dear,
Fossil fuel products dominate Australian energy consumption and this will remain the situation for the foreseeable future. Australia’s dependence on fossil fuels is heightened by the fact that electricity is largely produced in coal-fired power stations; approximately 84% of electricity for Australian homes and industry comes from coal and 12% from renewables, mainly hydroelectricity.

Helen asks…

Can my home electricity bills be a tax deduction if I pay for renewable energy?

I use green mountain energy co. and they supply renewable energy sources that cut down on pollution, like windmills. Is this considered a tax deduction?
I live in Texas

The Expert answers:

Mary J,

Thank you for your question.

See link

http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?c=products.pr_tax_credits

Betty asks…

What is the United Kingdoms policy towards increasing renewable energy sources and reducing global warming?

I just wondered what targets the Uk has set towards increasing renewable energy sources and decreasing greenhouse gases.
Peter Gas- i don’t want to know about the whole global warming conspiracy, that’s not what i asked… you might as well have not bothered answering the question because i really don’t want to know…

The Expert answers:

Pretty much the same as the EU’s as far as I can tell:
“steal $250 billion of your money, spend it on crap, destroy the landscape, raise taxes and deprive your children of an economic future.”
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100079237/aussie-sceptics-destroy-eu-carbon-commissioner/

“our Government wants to see us spend £100billion on building 10,000 more turbines, plus another £40billion on connecting them all up to the grid.

According to the electricity industry, we will then need to spend another £100billion on those conventional power stations to provide back-up — all of which adds up to £240billion by 2020, or just over £1,000 a year for every household in the land.”
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100078040/the-real-cost-of-global-warming/

Windfarms aren’t all their hyped-up to be
http://www.rogerhelmer.com/windfarms_video.asp
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100080019/wind-farms-kill-whales-blubber-on-the-green-movements-hands/

We need to forget them, and instead use Thorium based Nuclear reactors (Which are ALOT safer than the ones currently in use):

About


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/ambroseevans_pritchard/8393984/Safe-nuclear-does-exist-and-China-is-leading-the-way-with-thorium.html

And then ultimately Nuclear fusion (if Scientists can get this damn thing to work properly):
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/07/100727142415.htm

Susan asks…

What kind of money can someone make with an AAS in renewable energy?

Im thinking of going to school to get an associates of applied sciences degree in renewable energy. I was just wondering what kind of money someone with that would make.

The Expert answers:

If you own a degree – or any extra qualification – then you’ll already be ahead of the crowd when it comes to hunting for vocations. My mate has a degree and he wasn’t certain what direction to go with it, but he unearthed some good instruction on the site in the resource box below which guided him to decide that he wanted to be a lab assistant. There is lots of guidance on the site regarding extra vocations.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Your Questions About Green Living

Ken asks…

what stores have eco friendly clothes?

i trying to be green. i think being green is cool to me. I just want some organic clothes that will be comfortable and roomy.

so do you know any stores or websites i can go on to.

thanks for helping.

The Expert answers:

Check out the White Apricot Site.
Http://www.whiteapricot.com/

There you will find a ton of great info, recommendations, and deals on eco friendly fashion and beauty.

Donald asks…

Eco friendly clothes?

Does anyone know where I can get fashionable clothes that are eco friendly. Also, I don’t want the clothes to cost a fortune, because most eco clothes I see are expensive. So I’m looking for eco friendly, cost effective clothes. Please give me links if you can!

The Expert answers:

Try urban outfitters. They have brands that are eco friendly.

Robert asks…

Who would you recommend for eco friendly affordable clothes?

I don’t want to pay the earth to do my bit so want a reliable source for quality and changing designs and styles.

The Expert answers:

Actually, on both eco-friendly and affordable, absolutely any thrift store is where you ought to be headed. Reuse of what are almost always perfectly good clothes, at prices as little as 10% of new, zero direct impact on the earth (sure, there is indirect impact, they have to have electricity to run those stores nowadays).

After that, any amount of local is best…though hard to find in a lot of countries. But if you can find anything made by the likes of the Amish or other societies that reject much modern technologies, you will find they have grown their own fiber, produced their own fabrics, and sewn the clothes in ways that are very earth friendly.

If you insist on being “fashionable,” well…I could do a whole soapbox about how un-earth-friendly that is, but I’ll leave that to your own judgement. There are some companies out there that do good work with fair trade textiles, and also tend to prefer more earth friendly products…alas, I do not know any company names, so I can’t direct you.

Joseph asks…

modern eco-friendly clothes?

there are a lot of ecofriendly clothes out there, but i’m 16 and still want to dress my age. the stores i know of that are sustainable as well as with the times are american apparel, livity, herbivore clothing, and blend. can anyone direct me towards more stores like these? thanks

The Expert answers:

You can find eco-friendly clothes (and much more) almost anywhere now (depends where you live, and you just have to find the right places to look). If you can’t find crazy, super eco-friendly clothes, at least buy organic/vegan clothing. I’ll tell you right now, it’ll cost more than your average t shirt or jeans. But if you really want to make that change then go for it. You can also try looking for hemp clothing. Look for things that are printed with soy-based ink. Just little things like that are eco-friendly. It’ll be easier to find things online because there might not anything nearby for you to go to and shop there. Also, if you don’t want to go all-out or waste too much, it is also good to buy things that are made in the same country you are from. It might be hard to find something from your own country but there can be a few things. The reason this is eco-friendly is because people and resources from other countries were not exploited to make your clothing. And plus, it is less transportation (meaning less gas/oil). Majority (actually, ALL) of eco-friendly clothes that I have seen out there are still cute and trendy. So you don’t have to worry about not being able to dress your age. Good luck!

Sandra asks…

Do you like eco-friendly clothes?

Do you wear/buy any ecofriendly clothing? I like www.GreenvanaApparel.com. What are some of your favorite sites/stores?

The Expert answers:

I’m not opposed to eco friendly clothes but i don’t actively seek them.. :o)

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Your Questions About Green Living

Chris asks…

Explain how to make a sustainable home that uses less energy and water and increases the amount of recycling?

Explain how to make a sustainable home that uses less energy and water and increases the amount of recycling

please help

The Expert answers:

Be aware of the site, seasonal weather conditions, and which way is north, etc. Use unshaded windows facing south/ west for heat gain, the opposite to maintain coolness. Consider plantings for shade and wind blocking. Capture rainwater from the roof. Etc., etc.

Sandy asks…

How much does a sustainable energy home cost to build?

I am contemplating buying/building a house, for the first time, with no deadline. I haven’t selected a site yet (I know that changes things) but I want to know what I can expect. How does the intial cost of a sustainable energy home typically compare with a less green option?

The Expert answers:

This of course depends on a lot of different factors. But… For the most part it really doesn’t cost as much as many people think. Since you are building a home instead of trying to remodel a home it makes things much less expensive. Many people think that to be “sustainable” everything needs to be run entirely off of solar and will cost a fortune. This is very wrong.

First you need to figure out where most of the energy in your home is going to be used.
1. Heating/cooling
2. Water heating
3. Major appliances
4. Lighting & smaller appliances

So if you can reduce the energy needed by the largest energy users you can almost elminate your energy bill.

Solutions…

Like the first person answered, GEOTHERMAL heating/cooling system. This is something that anyone building a new home that has enough yard to bury some pipes should get. My sister just built a house with one of these systems and it only cost them $3000 more than a traditional system and they will have twice the heating/cooling power. And the system will have paid for itself after 3 years.

The department of energy’s page about Geothermal heat pumps
http://www.eere.energy.gov/consumer/your_home/space_heating_cooling/index.cfm/mytopic=12640

2nd… Heating your water. This is another huge energy use in the home. This can also be done using some Geothermal systems or you can go solar. Using solar Thermal collectors is a great way to heat your water. This method has been used for a long time and is also used in industrial situations for hotels and outdoor swimming pools. A new system for residential can cost around $5000.

Http://www.solarroofs.com/purchase/index.html#C

Check out this company just for kicks, they build some of the biggest solar heating systems in the world for resorts and Olympic pools.
Http://www.heliocol.com/commercial/commercial1.html

Spending more on better isulation, windows, and doors is another way to save on energy. People don’t realize how much of a difference that can make. You save maybe $20-50 on a cheaper window but in the long run you would be saving a LOT more by getting the better one.

You can add energy generating devices to your home for a lot less than you might think. And by using the solutions above the remaining energy needs should be significantly reduced. A grid-tied windmill that can supply 1000+ KWH a month is only about $5000.

Places like this offer packages for all types.
Http://www.wholesalesolar.com/complete-systems.html

Most of the places I listed here offer assistance or install by professionals but you can also do a lot of it yourself without having to go to school to know how.

Maria asks…

How do we ethically reduce the population to a sustainable level?

The world presently has 6.5 billion inhabitants, a number that far outstretches the capability of this planet to provide resources for so many people. We are headed for a malthusian catastrophe which will lead to great suffering in many regions of the world. How do you think we can ethically reduce the population to a sustainable level?

The Expert answers:

Freely available birth control. Sexual attitudes have to move beyond the Dark Ages.

Thomas asks…

How have the policies relating to sustainable development evolved?

Writing an essay and need to write about how policies relating to sustainable development are changing in the UK. Or can anyone tell me where I can find polices? I have the government aims, but not polices.

Many thanks

The Expert answers:

Poorly. It’s a stupid idea

Helen asks…

How would you engage the local community in the benefits of sustainable transport?

There are obvious benefits to sustainable travel such as walking and cycling: it’s healthy, it’s eco-friendly, it’s quick (no traffic jams) and it’s free!
Its important to engage the local community – BUT HOW?

The Expert answers:

U can make a site on it at – www.freewebs.com
u can stick posters up poles
u can put it on bebo, my space, face book and so on…
U can make a video about it and put it on youtube…

So many ways

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Your Questions About Green Living

Maria asks…

environmental movement a set up?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071214/ts_nm/bali_friday_dc

“They fear curbs would cramp economic growth.”

that exactly is the point behind the environmental movement. to cramp growth in China and India and leave natural resources to be consumed by the US and few others.

the illuminati has a plan to cut 80% of the world population, and this movement is the primary key, in addition to wars, such as that of iraq and afghanistan, orchestrated after the 9-11 controlled demolition events.

isn’t it interesting that the maniacs who started two world wars, the wars in korea, somalia, vietnam, and many others and destroyed the world in the process (just look at the destruction of the environment in hiroshima and nakazaki), want to “save” the world environment? isnt it a joke?

the illuminati is facing severe competition from China and iNdia and others, the illuminati is in serious panic. they use legitimate issues – such as the environment – to attain their selfish devilish ends.
“Uhh. Okay. Sure. Put the tinfoil fez back on, wouldn’t want CIA deathrays to getcha.”

unless you come up with another one, i’d assume that that is your BEST argument (which u use every time an idea takes u beyond your mind set).

The Expert answers:

Uhh. Okay. Sure. Put the tinfoil fez back on, wouldn’t want CIA deathrays to getcha.

David asks…

Is China doing well in their effort to destroy the Serengeti?

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_nQ5u79DOir4/TQBfR1hgaVI/AAAAAAAAABE/1ndPs48STDY/s1600/serengeti-map.jpg
http://www.savetheserengeti.org/issues/stop-the-serengeti-highway/#axzz1A4QcvIl7
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/08/100825103824.htm
http://mtwarakumekucha.blogspot.com/2010/09/serengeti-road-threatens-environmental.html
http://sites.google.com/site/zvezdaraforest/home/news-2
http://www.phoneforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2021
http://www.bellaonline.com/articles/art30936.asp
Let’s see now, how does this work?
Toss a few million at Tanzanian officials to authorize a “more efficient route for transporting heavy metals from the Lake Victoria region” through the Serengeti, when another less-destructive route is available.
Compensate the Tanzanians by offering low paying slave labor jobs in Chinese run mines where they are shot if they complain about working conditions.
Extract the natural resources (heavy metals) for China‘s own economic benefit in manufacturing unauthorized pirated versions of Western-designed cellphones so they can flood the market with them.
Make sure the new highway works towards decimating Tanzania’s #1 industry, Tourism, by assisting in destroying the natural migration of animals through the Serengeti Wildlife Preserve, which is not only a major tourist attraction, but also one of the top-10 natural wonders of the world.
Make Tanzania even more economically dependent upon the whims of the CCP, to hold them hostage in any future negotiations.

When is the world (read UN) going to wake up to the worldwide criminal behavior of CCP-led China and the mass-devastation to which it will lead?

Small countries may think they are getting a “piece of China‘s pie,” but all they are getting in the end is an empty plate.

The USA/West can live without a bunch of cheap cellphones on the market… can the world live without its wildlife?

Stop buying products Made in China!
Anyone who does so is promoting environmental destruction.
http://environment.change.org/blog/view/proposed_serengeti_highway_an_environmental_disaster_of_choice
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v467/n7313/full/467272a.html

The Expert answers:

Well from your links it does seem that China is causing more natural devastation around the world after successfully destroying millions of acres of some the world’s most fertile farmland and centuries old landmarks, and dislocating hundreds of thousands of people after building the 3 gorges damn. Now they have turned their environmental blind-eye to the African continent.

However, at the same time with out a major change in how goods are made, and who makes them this kind of thing is going to continue. Maybe it is better to shift jobs to India, and out of China. This should be the new global migration.

Mandy asks…

Is China doing well in its attempt to destroy the Serengeti?

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_nQ5u79DOir4/TQBfR1hgaVI/AAAAAAAAABE/1ndPs48STDY/s1600/serengeti-map.jpg
http://www.savetheserengeti.org/issues/stop-the-serengeti-highway/#axzz1A4QcvIl7
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/08/100825103824.htm
http://mtwarakumekucha.blogspot.com/2010/09/serengeti-road-threatens-environmental.html
http://sites.google.com/site/zvezdaraforest/home/news-2
http://www.phoneforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2021
http://www.bellaonline.com/articles/art30936.asp
Let’s see now, how does this work?
Toss a few million at Tanzanian officials to authorize a “more efficient route for transporting heavy metals from the Lake Victoria region” through the Serengeti, when another less-destructive route is available.
Compensate the Tanzanians by offering low paying slave labor jobs in Chinese run mines where they are shot if they complain about working conditions.
Extract the natural resources (heavy metals) for China‘s own economic benefit in manufacturing unauthorized pirated versions of Western-designed cellphones so they can flood the market with them.
Make sure the new highway works towards decimating Tanzania’s #1 industry, Tourism, by assisting in destroying the natural migration of animals through the Serengeti Wildlife Preserve, which is not only a major tourist attraction, but also one of the top-10 natural wonders of the world.
Make Tanzania even more economically dependent upon the whims of the CCP, to hold them hostage in any future negotiations.

When is the world (read UN) going to wake up to the worldwide criminal behavior of CCP-led China and the mass-devastation to which it will lead?

Small countries may think they are getting a “piece of China‘s pie,” but all they are getting in the end is an empty plate.

The USA/West can live without a bunch of cheap cellphones on the market… can the world live without its wildlife?

Stop buying products Made in China!
Anyone who does so is promoting environmental destruction.
http://environment.change.org/blog/view/proposed_serengeti_highway_an_environmental_disaster_of_choice
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v467/n7313/full/467272a.html

The Expert answers:

Nice. The Chinese aren’t just destroying their own country, they are doing it to others?
No more Chinese products for me. Thanks.

Joseph asks…

In what order are the issues that concern you the most in this election?

Here is the list of the issues that I see that the each candidate has different views on (in no particular order):

War On Terror / Afghanistan
Iraq
Homeland Security/Natural Disaster Preparedness
Other Foreign Policy (China, Russia, Israel, Iran, etc.)
Tax Policy
Financial Markets/Banking/Regulation
Trade Policy
Immigration Policy
Energy Policy (Oil, Natural Gas, Coal, Alternative Energy)
Environmental Policy
Health Care Policy/Regulation
Education
2nd Amendment Rights/Gun Control
Abortion
Definition of Marriage
Media Regulation (i.e. Fairness Doctrine)
Tort Law Policy
Infrastructure/Transportation Development
Social Security/Medicare Policy
Ethics/Lobbyist Reform

If I have forgotten any, please list…

The Expert answers:

War in Iraq
Economy
Health Care
Environment
Energy
Standing in the world (I’d like to be the ‘good guy’ again)

Robert asks…

Should abortion be used to prevent global warming?

Apparently, this idiot believes so…and you should not have more than 2 kids, if you do, you are irresponsible.

Question: What do you make of these comments? Is the left, attempting to make us into a China?

COUPLES who have more than two children are being “irresponsible” by creating an unbearable burden on the environment, the government’s green adviser has warned.

Jonathon Porritt, who chairs the government’s Sustainable Development Commission, says curbing population growth through contraception and abortion must be at the heart of policies to fight global warming. He says political leaders and green campaigners should stop dodging the issue of environmental harm caused by an expanding population.

A report by the commission, to be published next month, will say that governments must reduce population growth through better family planning.

“I am unapologetic about asking people to connect up their own responsibility for their total environmental footprint and how they decide to procreate and how many children they think are appropriate,” Porritt said.

“I think we will work our way towards a position that says that having more than two children is irresponsible. It is the ghost at the table. We have all these big issues that everybody is looking at and then you don’t really hear anyone say the “p” word.”

The Optimum Population Trust, a campaign group of which Porritt is a patron, says each baby born in Britain will, during his or her lifetime, burn carbon roughly equivalent to 2½ acres of old-growth oak woodland – an area the size of Trafalgar Square.

The British population, now 61m, will pass 70m by 2028, the Office for National Statistics says. The fertility rate for women born outside Britain is estimated to be 2.5, compared with 1.7 for those born here. The global population of 6.7 billion is expected to rise to 9.2 billion by 2050.

Porritt, who has two children, intends to persuade environmental pressure groups to make population a focus of campaigning.

“Many organisations think it is not part of their business. My mission with the Friends of the Earth and the Greenpeaces of this world is to say: ‘You are betraying the interests of your members by refusing to address population issues and you are doing it for the wrong reasons because you think it is too controversial,” he said.

Porritt, a former chairman of the Green party, says the government must improve family planning, even if it means shifting money from curing illness to increasing contraception and abortion.

He said: “We still have one of the highest rates of teenage pregnancies in Europe and we still have relatively high levels of pregnancies going to birth, often among women who are not convinced they want to become mothers.
ORCA, it seems you are the idiot.

Look at all the statistical facts regarding record number of snow falls.

(Saudi Arabia getting first snow and coldest winter in 20 years),

(in 07, South America had its coldest winter in 90 years)

NASA denying global warming as well.

Not to mention the ice levels are the same as it was in 1979.

The Expert answers:

Liberalism is a mental disorder.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Your Questions About Green Living

Linda asks…

If you where asked to invent an alternative energy company and create a corporate id for it. What would you do?

I am doing this for school, I have a rough idea of what I want to do, I want to hear any other ideas, thanks.
Hi thanks for the answer, but I was thinking more along the lines of actual renewable energy methods I agree that you have to wade though the information [excusey the pun] But I do think overall the movement is good, sometimes you need extreme action or radicalism to change minds.

Ive decided to model my company on Iberdola, they are the 5 largest energy producer in the europe and they just do renewable! Wind, Solar, Geo-thermal that works and actually provide millions with cleaner energy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iberdrola

The Expert answers:

My company would be called the Take Care of Your Own Self company. It would teach people reasonable ways to grow food for themselves so they had a healthier stamina to run around, re-use their own water to grow the food that gave their bodies energy, better structure their home so they didn’t need much energy to begin with. It would charge no money. It would be free like such information should be. So that for once people can know what is worth knowing, without driving their cars around to work and taco bell and back to save up the dough to learn a tiny bit of wisdom that is encapsulated in a wad of political BS.

Look, kid, if this assignment doesn’t show you how much of money making scam this “green” movement is, I don’t know if anything will. Should “saving the planet” through “alternative energy” cost a ton of money? Putting everyone further into debt so that they are desperate and incredibly wasteful? Think about it.

Donald asks…

Alternative Energy?

I would like to know if I can use a generator or car batteries or any other energy to light my small earthbag home other than solar or wind energy. Solar and wind energy is to expensive are there any other low cost ways to power my home? It has to be off-grid meaning not connected to a utility company.
gggsbaby – what are you talking about?

The Expert answers:

Problem with generators is that you have to fuel them with SOMEthing. IF you can solve that one, great. Batteries are all well and good, but again, how do you plan to charge them?

Thin film solar is getting really cheap. Look into it. And if there’s a reasonable amount of wind in your area, you can make your own windmill for under $100. Google the tv program American Invention for details.

Mary asks…

Why is President Bush trying to increase oil production instead of alternative energy?

Drilling off all of our coastline? A thinking leader should consider alternative options. I see nothing but greed in this plan. As our communities are destroyed, oil prices won’t decrease in price. The oil companies will keep getting richer.

He really scares me.

The Expert answers:

I think you are already know that his family is aligned with the oil industry. His administration has people connected to both the oil and military industries. It is a scary situation. What’s even more alarming are some of the opinions being expressed here.

Of course alternative energy is currently more expensive – its just starting. The fossil fuel industry had a 100 year head start to streamline their processes and make the whole world dependent on it. It will be a painful and costly shift to another energy source, that’s why governments have to step in and create incentives.

The option to do nothing is not an option. Even those who believe that “global warming” is a leftist conspiracy, must acknowledge the coming of “peak oil”. When peak oil is announced, it will send shockwaves of panic throughout the world.

No matter which part of the political spectrum you belong to, the issues related to CO2 emissions and the finite supply of oil is inevitable and will affect everyone. The people who still believe that the earth is flat and that global warming is fake has to look at the evidence and join the rest of us in pressuring governments to act.

James asks…

Are you interested in wind and solar energy for your home and what do you think of loan companies for?

homeowners who want to install small wind turbines and solar panels on their home?

Before the Conservatives go rambling on about government subsidies, this is something that’s happening in the private sector. The deals being offered allow homeowners (who can show that they are in good standing with their payments and not in an underwater mortgage) to take out loans (interest rates are similar to what you’d get for a car loan) for the installation of wind and solar panels on their homes. In order to qualify the homeowners have to purchase units that are pre-approved (durability issues – the loan issuers don’t want people purchasing equipment that’s cheaply made and likely to break) so there’s a preferred list of equipment providers whose items you can get the loans for. The reason this is happening is that with energy companies trying to bleed the country dry and continuously raising rates, and with the cost of components for residential wind and solar installations falling rapidly, we are reaching the point where a home wind turbine or solar panel installation can pay for itself in less than 7 years-which is the maximum term available for one of these loans.

Do you have a personal interest in alternative energy and if you could get a $7000 loan at 5.5% interest on a 7 year term to install a wind turbine or solar panels on your property would you consider that deal?
@ Vanessa – explain to me how you think a residential wind turbine is “terrible for the environment”. They’re popping up all over where I live – the ones that are on 30 to 40 foot towers with a blade-span of six to eight feet. People put those plastic owls on them just like they do with large picture windows to prevent bird strikes.

Small wind turbines do not damage the environment.
@ Barry – wind in the North, Solar in the South.

The Expert answers:

Sounds like a good idea

Laura asks…

I am looking for an Australian company that is involved in the field of alternative energy?

The company needs to be registered in Australia and has a share value of approximately $Au10 cents or under.

The Expert answers:

Here are some possibilities, in order from smallest share price to greatest:

Solco Limited
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=soo:AU
$.17 AUD

EnviroMission http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=evm:AU
$.18 AUD

Environmental Clean Technologies
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=esi:AU
$.20 AUD

Linc Energy Ltd
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=lnc:AU
$.285 AUD

Agri Energy
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=aae:AU
$.38 AUD

Hope this helps!

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Your Questions About Green Living

George asks…

Is Obama using scare tactics to try to get the stimulus bill passed?

Obama has said that we are going to have a catastrophe if we do not pass this pork laden stimulus bill. Why is he using scare tactics?

Obama was one to complain about Bush’s spending, but look at the pork in this bill. The items include:

List of all the projects we need or else we will never recover!

$50 million for the National Endowment for the Arts
$380 million in the Senate bill for the Women, Infants and Children program
$198 million for Filipino World War 2 vets and their families
$300 million for grants to combat violence against women
$2 billion for federal child-care block grants
$6 billion for university building projects
$15 billion for boosting Pell Grant college scholarships
$4 billion for job-training programs, including $1.2 billion for “youths” up to the age of 24
$1 billion for community-development block grants
$4.2 billion for “neighborhood stabilization activities”
$650 million for digital-TV coupons
$90 million to educate “vulnerable populations”
$15 billion for business-loss carry-backs
$145 billion for “Making Work Pay” tax credits
$83 billion for the earned income credit
$150 million for the Smithsonian
$34 million to renovate the Department of Commerce headquarters
$500 million for improvement projects for National Institutes of Health facilities
$44 million for repairs to Department of Agriculture headquarters
$350 million for Agriculture Department computers
$88 million to help move the Public Health Service into a new building
$448 million for constructing a new Homeland Security Department headquarters
$600 million to convert the federal auto fleet to hybrids
$450 million for NASA (carve-out for “climate-research missions”)
$600 million for NOAA (carve-out for “climate modeling”)
$1 billion for the Census Bureau
$89 billion for Medicaid
$30 billion for COBRA insurance extension
$36 billion for expanded unemployment benefits
$20 billion for food stamps
$4.5 billion for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
$850 million for Amtrak
$87 million for a polar icebreaking ship
$1.7 billion for the National Park System
$55 million for Historic Preservation Fund
$7.6 billion for “rural community advancement programs”
$150 million for agricultural-commodity purchases
$150 million for “producers of livestock, honeybees, and farm-raised fish”
$2 billion for renewableenergy research ($400 million for global-warming research)
$2 billion for a “clean coal” power plant in Illinois
$6.2 billion for the Weatherization Assistance Program
$3.5 billion for energy-efficiency and conservation block grants
$3.4 billion for the State Energy Program
$200 million for state and local electric-transport projects
$300 million for energy-efficient-appliance rebate programs
$400 million for hybrid cars for state and local governments
$1 billion for the manufacturing of advanced batteries
$1.5 billion for green-technology loan guarantees
$8 billion for innovative-technology loan-guarantee program
$2.4 billion for carbon-capture demonstration projects
$4.5 billion for electricity grid
$79 billion for State Fiscal Stabilization Fund

Do we really need a $87 Million polar ice breaker? How is that going to stimulate the economy? I thought we were having global warming and the polar ice caps are melting. Is this just scare tactics or what?
FU – How is this a false list? This was posted on a web site by one of our press reporters. I cut and pasted.

The Expert answers:

Yeah, Instead of sitting down with the moderates and hammering out an agreeable “Spending Bill,” he’s out there campaigning fear and division. It’s for the reasons you post that many do not support this bill as is. Too much self serving special interest, earmarks and pork.

Mandy asks…

Can you think of a better reason to spend 3 minutes contacting Ur Representative NOW?

$50 million for the National Endowment for the Arts
$380 million in the Senate bill for the Women, Infants and Children program
$198 million for Filipino World War 2 vets and their families
$300 million for grants to combat violence against women
$2 billion for federal child-care block grants
$6 billion for university building projects
$15 billion for boosting Pell Grant college scholarships
$4 billion for job-training programs, including $1.2 billion for “youths” up to the age of 24
$1 billion for community-development block grants (ACORN)
$4.2 billion for “neighborhood stabilization activities”
$650 million for digital-TV coupons
$90 million to educate “vulnerable populations”
$15 billion for business-loss carry-backs
$145 billion for “Making Work Pay” tax credits
$83 billion for the earned income credit
$150 million for the Smithsonian
$34 million to renovate the Department of Commerce headquarters
$500 million for improvement projects for National Institutes of Health facilities
$44 million for repairs to Department of Agriculture headquarters
$350 million for Agriculture Department computers
$88 million to help move the Public Health Service into a new building
$448 million for constructing a new Homeland Security Department headquarters
$600 million to convert the federal auto fleet to hybrids
$450 million for NASA (carve-out for “climate-research missions”)
$600 million for NOAA (carve-out for “climate modeling”)
$1 billion for the Census Bureau
$89 billion for Medicaid
$30 billion for COBRA insurance extension
$36 billion for expanded unemployment benefits
$20 billion for food stamps
$4.5 billion for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
$850 million for Amtrak
$87 million for a polar icebreaking ship
$1.7 billion for the National Park System
$55 million for Historic Preservation Fund
$7.6 billion for “rural community advancement programs”
$150 million for agricultural-commodity purchases
$150 million for “producers of livestock, honeybees, and farm-raised fish”
$2 billion for renewableenergy research ($400 million for global-warming research)
$2 billion for a “clean coal” power plant in Illinois
$6.2 billion for the Weatherization Assistance Program
$3.5 billion for energy-efficiency and conservation block grants
$3.4 billion for the State Energy Program
$200 million for state and local electric-transport projects
$300 million for energy-efficient-appliance rebate programs
$400 million for hybrid cars for state and local governments
$1 billion for the manufacturing of advanced batteries
$1.5 billion for green-technology loan guarantees
$8 billion for innovative-technology loan-guarantee program
$2.4 billion for carbon-capture demonstration projects
$4.5 billion for electricity grid
$79 billion for State Fiscal Stabilization Fund

The Expert answers:

Great summary.

Why is the federal government sticking its nose in everything these days? History shows that federal “help” is more of a hinderance than a help.

Butt out, Big Brother!

Donald asks…

Admitting now that corn ethanol was/is a mistake, will Al Gore also fess up on catastrophic global warming?

“U.S. corn ethanol “was not a good policy”-Gore”

Mon Nov 22, 2010 7:24am EST

* U.S. ethanol consumes about 40 pct corn crop
* Impact on food prices “real”

By Gerard Wynn

“ATHENS, Nov 22 (Reuters) – Former U.S. vice-president Al Gore said support for corn-based ethanol in the United States was “not a good policy”, weeks before tax credits are up for renewal.
U.S. blending tax breaks for ethanol make it profitable for refiners to use the fuel even when it is more expensive than gasoline. The credits are up for renewal on Dec. 31.

Total U.S. ethanol subsidies reached $7.7 billion last year according to the International Energy Industry, which said biofuels worldwide received more subsidies than any other form of renewable energy.

“It is not a good policy to have these massive subsidies for (U.S.) first generation ethanol,” said Gore, speaking at a green energy business conference in Athens sponsored by Marfin Popular Bank.

“First generation ethanol I think was a mistake. The energy conversion ratios are at best very small.

“It’s hard once such a programme is put in place to deal with the lobbies that keep it going.”

He explained his own support for the original programme on his presidential ambitions.

“One of the reasons I made that mistake is that I paid particular attention to the farmers in my home state of Tennessee, and I had a certain fondness for the farmers in the state of Iowa because I was about to run for president.”

A food-versus-fuel debate erupted in 2008, in the wake of record food prices, where the biofuel industry was criticised for helping stoke food prices.

Gore said a range of factors had contributed to that food price crisis, including drought in Australia, but said there was no doubt biofuels have an effect.

“The size, the percentage of corn particularly, which is now being (used for) first generation ethanol definitely has an impact on food prices.

“The competition with food prices is real.””

(Reporting by Gerard Wynn; editing by Keiron Henderson)
http://www.reuters.com/article/idAFLDE6AL0YT20101122?sp=true
Slug Rock….. you might try enrolling in a comprehensive reading class. You’re coming off as a Moonie.

The Expert answers:

You provide an article that references Gore and you still have alarmists that want to blame Bush. It seems to me that Gore isn’t really admitting to a mistake. He is calling it first generation ethanol. I am sure he will push for 2nd generation and is simply dismissing the past failures to first generation. The implementation wasn’t his fault. He was just the messenger. The man is clearly deranged with a Messiah Complex. Their government mandates led to corruption failure and wasted money. Why is that leftists only solution to excessive government is more.

Sandra asks…

Why should voters put up with even 2 more years of this nonsense?

Wind, solar energy built on temporary tax breaks

WASHINGTON – Congress is putting the short-term future of renewable energy companies in jeopardy even as the presidential candidates and most lawmakers hail windmills, solar panels and biofuels as long-term solutions to high gasoline prices and global warming.

Some $500 million in investment and production tax credits will expire Dec. 31 unless Congress renews them. Without that help, solar and wind power companies say they will reverse planned expansions and, in many cases, cut payrolls and capital investment.

Schott Solar has visions of quadrupling its operation in Albuquerque, N.M., to reach 1,500 jobs and $500 million in investment. But the investment tax credit, company spokesman Brian Lynch said, is what makes solar power cost-competitive. Without it, expansion plans must be reconsidered

And Nancy Pelosi and Harold Ried think calling back congress to vote on a bipartisan energy bill that both good Democrats and Republicans have worked on is not important.

Party politics as usual and to he** with the voters

The Expert answers:

I hope that you aren’t blaming the Democrats for the lack of legislation to help renewable power. The Republicans have done nothing although they have been in a position to do so for the majority of the last 8 years. Then, after doing nothing or prohibiting the Democrats from doing anything, they make a grandstand play trying to make it look like the Dems fault for going on a 5 week recess. Once again the Republicans think that the American people are stupid and will fall for their B.S. Wait a minute maybe they have a point after all there is a track record of the American people falling for their “bull”( Think G.W. Bush). Maybe that is why they think they can do it again

Chris asks…

What do you think of Obama’s voting history as a Senator as opposed to what he’s saying now?

Why on the BIG issues that were put before him in office, did he choose NOT TO VOTE. But he voted and pushed for little meaningless things like “Congratulating the White sox on winning the World Series??”

Examples:

2/28/08 Vote 35: On the Cloture Motion: Motion to Invoke Cloture on the Motion to Proceed to H.R.3221; New Direction for Energy Independence, National Security, and Consumer Protection Act and the Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation Tax Act of 2007 : NOT VOTING

2/26/08 Vote 33: On the Cloture Motion: Motion to Invoke Cloture on the Motion to Proceed to Consider S. 2633; A bill to provide for the safe redeployment of United States troops from Iraq. NOT VOTING

2/7/08 Vote 10: H R 5140: H.R. 5140 As Amended; Recovery Rebates and Economic Stimulus for the American People Act of 2008 : NOT VOTING

4/10/08 Vote 95: H R 3221: Ensign Amdt. No. 4419; To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for the limited continuation of clean energy production incentives and incentives to improve energy efficiency in order to prevent a downturn in these sectors that would result from a lapse in the tax law. NOT VOTING

4/4/08 Vote 91: H R 3221: Voinovich Amdt. No. 4406 As Modified; To protect families most vulnerable to foreclosure due to a sudden loss of income by extending the depreciation incentive to loss companies that have accumulated alternative minimum tax and research and development tax credits. NOT VOTING

4/3/08 Vote 87: S RES 501: S. Res. 501; A resolution honoring the sacrifice of the members of the United States Armed Forces who have been killed in Iraq and Afghanistan. NOT VOTING

Yet he did vote in between all those votes for things like:

3/14/08 Vote 82: S CON RES 70: DeMint Amdt. No. 4339; To provide for a deficit-neutral reserve fund for providing an above the line Federal income tax deduction for individuals purchasing health insurance outside the workplace. VOTED NO

3/13/08 Vote 77: S CON RES 70: Kyl Amdt. No. 4372; To protect small businesses, family ranches and farms from the Death Tax by providing a $5 million exemption, a low rate for smaller estates and a maximum rate no higher than 35% VOTED NO

Im confused, if he is so for or against these like he says, why didnt he vote? And if he is for small business and families and those needing insurance, why did he vote against them?? Any help ??

The Expert answers:

Because he is a liar. I did a speech comparing John Mccain and Barrak Obama for a speech class and I looked into the bills passed by both senators. Mccain has a good history of voting for indian reservation land rights, millitary aid for veterans and such and quite a bit of other items, not many really controversial issues. Obama has passed like two bills, one was for summer learning day ?? And he co signed and helped write a few others that gave financial assistance to college minorities, but none of them passed in both houses. So in other words Obama hasnt really done anything besides creating a summer learning day and voting no on iraq.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Your Questions About Green Living

Sharon asks…

How much money is enought for me to retire?

Objective: retirement with enough money sustainable for food, house, travelling and a quiet life. My wife works, and we have no kids. We live in Beijing with two houses–one we live and one we rent to other people.

The Expert answers:

The simple answer?

(1) Figure out your current monthly expenses, including taxes and extras.

(2) Multiple by 12

(3) Multiple by an estimate of your remaining life. There are actuarial tables for this purpose, although they tend to under-estimate the long lived and add too much to the short lived.

The only real problem with this number is that it tends to ignore two different but important concepts:

(a) The added costs of growing old. These include general care as well as health care. It also includes the point in time when you can no longer work. If, for example, you loose your rental house at the age of 65, you could more than likely go back to work earning a decent living. At 85, that option would be much less likely.

(b) Inflation. The tendency of the cost of things to go up as time goes on. The plague of the middle class…if you live more than two decades in retirement, it is entirely possible that it will cost you twice as much for the same thing (you have now). If you don’t plan for this, you may come up short.

Daniel asks…

How do we create a sustainable, advanced economy for the future?

Today’s industrial economy is based upon explointing labor, natural resources, and the environment as a whole. Today’s farming is based upon degrading the land and water for high yields. Neither industry nor farming have much regard for whether their methods can be sustained long-term. The future is at stake.

Clearly, we must re-focus our efforts toward a more-responsible economy and lifestyle, but this re-focusing will cost plenty. Volunteering to give up the wasteful methods that produce cheap goods and cheap food won’t be an easy pill to swallow for the American populace, where bigger has always been considered better. It’s counter to our sense of “progress.”

How do we convince our populace that this must be done or risk our long-term survival as a nation and people of this smaller-and-smaller earth?

How do we convince others to make the same sacrifices, especially those such as India and China just on the cusp of traditional economic wealth?

The Expert answers:

I don’t know if you can convince someone… It takes longer (and more money) to do something the right way… More money equals higher taxes… It seems like most people don’t care about the “right way” to do things.. Only the cheap way…

I just hope the earth is more resilient than we think…

Steven asks…

What kind of food do you mostly take-out from restaurants or cafe? (Ex. salad, soup, hamburger, etc)?

I’m going to create a sustainable take-away packaging (boxes, cups, bags). I’d like to hear what popular take-out dishes are, and create three different kind of packaging which fit to quantity or form of food. (Pizza requires a spacious box, and soup contains in special container for liquid food.)
And when you think about take-out packaging, what is the most considerable thing?

The Expert answers:

Pizza subs and salads

Jenny asks…

Discuss the possible implications (positive and negative) of the sustainable agriculture/locally grown food.?

Discuss the possible implications (positive and negative) of the sustainable agriculture/locally grown foods movement on American agriculture

The Expert answers:

Local food can be sustainable because it reduces food miles; that is, it reduces the distance food has to travel from the farms to reach us, the consumers. Because food miles are reduced, less fuel (usually from fossil fuel sources) would be reduced. Hence, this leads to lesser CO2 emission and less detrimental global warming. One more way local food can be sustainable is it provide jobs.

However, some food items are best imported rather than grown locally. This is because America cannot possibly grow all its food. Limitations by weather, soil, or infrastructure make production of some local food more expensive and more environmentally detrimental than if the food were to be brought in from another country.

So, in short, it is best America grows what it grows best (locally) and imports those which are best grown elsewhere.

Lisa asks…

Will Sustainable Agriculture be able to feed the world’s population in 50 years?

I need specific data that will support the idea that SA will be able to feed the world in 50 years. I had my choice of Genetically Modified foods, or Sustainable Agriculture, and due to moral reasons I chose Sustainable Agriculture. Now I can’t find data to support my choice. Help! This is a VERY casual paper…we are able to plagiarize as much as we’d like…the instructor would just like us to be able to supply him with data.

The Expert answers:

As you have decided the use of GMO is immoral, I question your personal morality, obviously honesty has precious little use in it.

To answer your question: While the incorporation of Sustainable techniques will increase in usage, to date no properly conducted and analyzed scientific study has shown that these techniques will increase yield (most indicate a 10-25% lower yield compared to conventional agriculture). However, the subject has not be adequately researched to prove either method provides the superior yield consistently.

If you review the literature and conduct some of the research, a few things that do become apparent.

Conventional agriculture is ‘leaky’ meaning some of the compounds used do move and are found in areas outside of the application area

The use of conventional agriculture tends to put producers (farmers, etc) on the “technology treadmill”. This means once you get on board, the producer has to constantly be learning, adapting and responding to the economic pressure of excessively low prices due to increased supply without increased demand.

Use of only Sustainable agriculture techniques is unwieldy. Once locked into this group of techniques and markets, change is difficult. This leads to an industry ill prepared for an uncertain future. Flexibility has always been required for a business to adapt to an every changing world.

Sustainable agriculture will have lower input costs, but tends to have a higher cost per unit of production. Without the ability to increase yield, price per unit of production must increase along with inflation, else the business becomes unprofitable. Prices for agricultural produce (the goods produced by the farmer) have not kept up with inflation over the past century. This price is highly correlated with demand and supply. Organic or Sustainable foods tend to bring greater prices per unit (almost 2x conventional) but currently face little in the way of production competition. Once the supply increases, prices will decrease.

The future of agriculture is very positive. Sustainable practices, especially those involving soil microbiology will increase the efficiency of chemical applications (fertilizer, pests, use of GMO’s), however they will not replace the extremely efficient and cost effective programs of conventional agriculture. Unless, of course, the religious zealots of the environmental movement idiotically make it illegal to farm conventionally. (If so, get ready for a dramatic increase in food costs to the general public, including you).

So the short answer, when incorporated with current conventional agricultural techniques, Sustainable agriculture will help feed the world, but as currently envisioned by some, no.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Translate »