Your Questions About Green Living

Can Obama & Democrats get away with more corruption because 80% of US Media will ignore it,is in bed with them?

If a Republican President exploited a federal program of providing money to alternative energy corporations by conpsiring to create phoney holding companies re-selling obsolete Chinese technologies at a loss so that executives could pad their wallets and launder money back to their re-election campaign, would ABC News, NBC News, CBS News, CNN, MSNBC, AP, NY Times, NPR let them get away with it????

But would they ever bother looking at Obama and Solyndra, Abound, Evergreen Solar since it might hurt their liberal agenda???

What about all the lies we heard about Obama raising taxes?

Here is what he is saying:

“cutting taxes for the middle class, raising taxes on the wealthy, pouring money into ‘green energy‘ and requiring employers to set up retirement saving plans for their workers.”

“Obama said he could pay for his programs by eliminating the Bush administration’s tax cuts for the wealthy, winding down the Iraq war and spending more on alternative energy programs that eventually will save money.”

So where is all the claims that he is going to do away with Bush’s tax cuts? He’s going to do away with them for the wealthy.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080614/ap_on_el_pr/obama_economy
He is real clear how he pays for everything. He is going to get the rich to pay for it with higher taxes. Them and the rich corporations. Health care and social security. They will pay what they were suppose to pay a long time ago.

Is This the Reason Obama Said ‘No’ to the Keystone Pipeline?

Comments (305)In rejecting the Keystone XL pipeline project this past week, the Obama administration did exactly what they told everyone they were going to do.

The question many are asking is, “Why?”

Why did the President kill the pipeline deal that so many Democrats, Republicans and labor union leaders support?

Was it done because:

A. – As the administration has said publicly, there is not enough time to do a proper environmental impact study?

B. – Thanks to alternative energy companies like Solyndra, we’re on the path to becoming an oil-free energy generating country?

C. – Billionaire Warren Buffett (and Obama advisor) has an investment in a Canadian railway that would benefit from killing Keystone?

D. – Is it because Brazil, the country whose deep-water oil fields we agreed to fund, is going to be selling us cheap and plentiful oil?

In the case of the environmental impact study argument, it has been noted that the project could begin moving forward and jobs be created as another study commenced. If the findings show that the pipeline’s route needed to be changed, or additional safety measures put in place, those could easily be added to the project.

The Solyndra question answers itself.

Concerning the Warren Buffett investment, Bloomberg News reports:

How Could Everyone Have Fallen For OPEC Trap?

I just was watching news ticker on bloomberg channel and it says ”that oil is expected to rally/go up to $75 or higher before mid-summer because of demand rebounding.What is all of this nonsense when we are in a global recession,people losing their jobs left and right,”supposed to be conserving energy”,”supposed to switch on to alternative energy & off-shore oil drilling”(what pres.obama promised in his campaign),auto makers possible bankruptcies and more possible lay-offs,people ”supposed to have been driving less”,and supposed to be buying small compact fuel efficient hybrid type vehicles.Were you’ll serious about carrying out these stuff or were these just empty threaths that played right into opec trap?
Will it be like 2007/2008 and wait until crude oil get back to over $125 a barrel then make more false threaths to OPEC with absolutely little to no action to back it up?

Laws of Sustainability – My Poetry any comments most welcome?

Laws of Sustainability

Close to the peak of world production
Worshippers of growth hit the headlines
They have proudly reached the top
The uphill climb that can only end in a drop
A decline another heartless head line
World war hurt population growth.

Read all about it below 3% Dip Recession
News reporters spread lies
To prevent depression
Ease the pain to sell papers for gain.
But to be intellectually honest
The arithmetic of steady growth attained
That growth of population
And growth of rates of consumption
Of rate of resources cannot be sustained

So our worshippers of growth
Turn to worship science and technology
A growing industry to solve the problems
Of population growth, food, energy and resources

We can buy it all with copper in our purse
It’s plentiful and if it runs out
Make it from other metals
Chemistry will figure it out someday so said
A trusty advisor “Julian Simon” sunny spells
Washington DC exalted his name

But what survives over population
Can democracy, human decency,
World population present growth rate at
Ten thousand people per hour
But everyone talks about Smart Growth
Surely that means we simply have such good taste
So much so we eat ourselves to death
Our taste for the environment too goes hand in hand
Threatened only by Global Warming ashes to ashes
You understand USA so please set an example to the world

Your manmade solutions have created more problems
Galileo! Galileo! Do the fan-dangled in a while crocodile
Leave nature alone
But by all means do look first at the problem
But look too how the solution could cause further problems
Remember the tears of the River Nile

The more the merrier so the saying goes
But is this really demonstrable
After all exponential function y=e^x
To simplify if we stop wars
Improve health, grow more food produce
Find alternative energy supplies
And we therefore increase in number mode
This would be utopia or just claustrophobia?
Left without a moral code